<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Eurosurveillance latest updates</title>
    <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/</link>
    <description>Eurosurveillance: peer-reviewed european information on communicable disease surveillance and control</description>
    <langage>eng</langage>
    <copyright>Copyright: http://www.eurosurveillance.org</copyright>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss/</docs>
    <generator>Eurosurveillance news RSS generator</generator>
    <managineditor>visit: http://www.eurosurveillance.org</managineditor>
    <webmaster>visit: http://www.eurosurveillance.org</webmaster>
    
    <ttl>1</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>A perspective on emerging mosquito and phlebotomine-borne diseases in Europe</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19503</link>
      <description>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19503</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>West Nile virus in Europe: understanding the present to gauge the future</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19508</link>
      <description>The appearance of West Nile virus in New York in 1999 and the unprecedented panzootic that followed, have stimulated a major research effort in the western hemisphere and a new interest in the presence of this virus in the Old World. This review considers current understanding of the natural history of this pathogen, with particular regard to transmission in Europe.
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19508</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yellow fever and dengue: a threat to Europe?</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19509</link>
      <description>The introduction and rapidly expanding range of Aedes albopictus in Europe is an iconic example of the growing risk of the globalisation of vectors and vector-borne diseases. The history of yellow fever and dengue in temperate regions confirms that transmission of both diseases could recur, particularly if Ae. aegypti, a more effective vector, were to be re-introduced.  The article is a broad overview of the natural history and epidemiology of both diseases in the context of these risks.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19509</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rift Valley fever - a threat for Europe?</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19506</link>
      <description>Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a severe mosquito-borne disease affecting humans and domestic ruminants, caused by a Phlebovirus (Bunyaviridae). It is widespread in Africa and has recently spread to Yemen and Saudi Arabia. RVF epidemics are more and more frequent in Africa and the Middle East, probably in relation with climatic changes (episodes of heavy rainfall in eastern and southern Africa), as well as intensified livestock trade. The probability of introduction and large-scale spread of RVF in Europe is very low, but localized RVF outbreaks may occur in humid areas with a large population of ruminants. Should this happen, human cases would probably occur in exposed individuals: farmers, veterinarians, slaughterhouse employees etc. Surveillance and diagnostic methods are available, but control tools are limited: vector control is difficult to implement, and vaccines are only available for ruminants, with either a limited efficacy (inactivated vaccines) or a residual pathogenic effect. The best strategy to protect Europe and the rest of the world against RVF is to develop more efficient surveillance and control tools and to implement coordinated regional monitoring and control programmes.
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19506</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19505</link>
      <description>Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe is reviewed, based on a search of literature up to and including 2009. Topics covered are the disease, its relevance, transmission and epidemiology, diagnostic methods, treatment, prevention, current geographical distribution, potential factors triggering changes in distribution, and risk prediction. Potential factors triggering distribution changes include vectorial competence, importation or dispersal of vectors and reservoir hosts, travel, and climatic/environmental change. The risk of introducing leishmaniasis into the European Union (EU) and its spread among Member States was assessed for the short (2-3 years) and long term (15-20 years). There is only a low risk of introducing exotic Leishmania species because of the absence of proven vectors and/or reservoir hosts. The main threat comes from the spread of the two parasites endemic in the EU, namely Leishmania infantum, which causes zoonotic visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis in humans and the domestic dog (the reservoir host), and L. tropica, which causes anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. The natural vector of L. tropica occurs in southern Europe, but periodic disease outbreaks in Greece (and potentially elsewhere) should be easily contained by surveillance and prompt treatment, unless dogs or other synanthropic mammals prove to be reservoir hosts. The northward spread of L. infantum from the Mediterranean region will depend on whether climate and land cover permit the vectors to establish seasonal biting rates that match those of southern Europe. Increasing dog travel poses a significant risk of introducing L. infantum into northern Europe, and the threat posed by non-vectorial dog-to-dog transmission should be investigated.
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19505</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arthropod-borne viruses transmitted by Phlebotomine sandflies in Europe: a review </title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19507</link>
      <description>Phlebotomine sandflies are known to transmit leishmaniases, bacteria and viruses that affect humans and animals in many countries worldwide. These sandfly-borne viruses are mainly the Phlebovirus, the Vesiculovirus and the Orbivirus. Some of these viruses are associated with outbreaks or human cases in the Mediterranean Europe. In this paper, the viruses transmitted by Phlebotomine sandflies in Europe (Toscana virus, Sicilian virus, sandfly fever Naples virus) are reviewed and their medical importance, geographical distribution, epidemiology and potential spreading discussed. Data on vertebrate reservoirs is sparse for sandfly fever viruses. The factor currently known to limit the spread of diseases is mainly the distribution areas of potential vectors. The distribution areas of the disease may not be restricted to the areas where they have been recorded but could be as wide as those of their vectors, that is to say Larroussius and P. papatasi mainly but not exclusively. Consequently, field work in form of viral isolation from sandflies and possible reservoirs as well as laboratory work to establish vectorial competence of colonised sandflies need to be encouraged in a near future, and epidemiological surveillance should be undertaken throughout the European Union.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19507</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Europe: current situation calls for preparedness</title>
      <link>http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19504</link>
      <description>During the last decade Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) emerged and/or re-emerged in several Balkan countries, Turkey, southwestern regions of the Russian Federation, and the Ukraine, with considerable high fatality rates. Reasons for re-emergence of CCHF include climate and anthropogenic factors such as changes in land use, agricultural practices or hunting activities, movement of livestock that may influence host-tick-virus dynamics. In order to be able to design prevention and control measures targeted at the disease, mapping of endemic areas and risk assessment for CCHF in Europe should be completed. Furthermore, areas at risk for further CCHF expansion should be identified and human, vector and animal surveillance be strengthened. 
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid ispermalink="false">http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>