Eurosurveillance banner


Eurosurveillance is planning to publish a special issue on Socio-economic determinants and infections diseases in Europe in spring of 2010. For this reason Eurosurveillance invites interested scientists who have research findings in the area to submit papers for review and possible publication.

The data from 27 European Union countries plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway show that considerable progress has been made in preventing and controlling the disease. The number of newly diagnosed cases and the overall notification rate declined continuously in the past decade, and the notification rate in 2007 was 12% lower than in 2003. In spite of this decline, a total of 84,917 new cases of TB were registered in 2007 and a number of challenges hamper the progress towards the elimination of TB in the EU.

A number of bacterial and viral infections in pregnant women can have serious effects on the unborn child leading to impaired mental and physical health later in life. This week’s issue of Eurosurveillance is dedicated to infectious diseases in pregnancy.

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem in many European countries. To mark the very first European Antibiotic Awareness Day, on 18 November, the scientific journal Eurosurveillance runs a series of articles to highlight main aspects of the AMR problem in Europe. They will be published in two issues on 13 and 20 November 2008.

In preparation for the coming influenza season 2008-9, Eurosurveillance publishes a special issue on prevention of influenza by vaccination. Seasonal influenza poses a serious public health threat because of associated serious morbidity and mortality. In Europe, estimates suggest that influenza is responsible for around 40,000 to 220,000 excess deaths, depending on the severity of the epidemic.

Today Eurosurveillance is publishing a special issue dedicated to the widespread advances made in Europe in estimating the real number of newly acquired HIV infections based on an innovative approach called STARHS

To tie in with World Hepatitis Day on 19 May, the scientific journal Eurosurveillance is today publishing a special issue on viral hepatitis, highlighting issues and challenges related to hepatitis B and C.

On 17 April 2008, Eurosurveillance is publishing a special issue with articles on the measles situation in Europe. The publication is linked to European Immunisation Week which runs from 21-27 April.

World Tuberculosis Day on 24 March commemorates the date in 1882 when Robert Koch presented his findings of the causing agent of tuberculosis (TB) – Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In the run up of this day Eurosurveillance publishes a special issue on the situation of TB in Europe.

Today (6 March, 2008), Eurosurveillance, the European peer-reviewed journal of infectious diseases, publishes a special issue on meningococcal disease. It includes two in-depth articles and an editorial by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Monthly Release  2003: Volume 8/ Issue 2 Article 2 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
en es fr
Previous Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 8, Issue 2, 01 February 2003
Editorial
Explosive increase of Salmonella Java in poultry in the Netherlands: Consequences for public health

Citation style for this article: van Pelt W, van der Zee H, Wannet WJ, van de Giessen AW, Mevius DJ, Bolder NM, van Duynhoven YT. Explosive increase of Salmonella Java in poultry in the Netherlands: Consequences for public health. Euro Surveill. 2003;8(2):pii=398. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=398
W. van Pelt 1, H. van der Zee 2, W.J.B. Wannet 3, A.W. van de Giessen 4, D.J. Mevius 5, N.M. Bolder 6, R.E. Komijn 7, Y.T.H.P. van Duynhoven 1

1. Centrum voor Infectieziekten Epidemiologie (CIE, Centre for Infectious Diseases Epidemiology), RIVM, The Nertherlands
2. Keuringsdienst van Waren Oost (KvW, Food Inspection Department East), Zutphen, The Netherlands
3. Laboratorium voor Infectieziektendiagnostiek en Screening (LIS, Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Diagnostics and Screening), RIVM, The Netherlands
4. Microbiologisch Laboratorium voor Gezondheidsbescherming (MGB, Microbiology Laboratory for Health Protection), RIVM, The Netherlands
5. Central Institute for Animal Disease Control, CIDC-Lelystad, The Netherlands
6. Institute for Animal Science and Health, ID-Lelystad, The Netherlands
7. Rijksdienst voor de keuring van Vee en Vlees (RVV, National Inspection Service for Livestock and Meat), The Netherlands



In the Netherlands Salmonella Paratyphi B variant Java increased in poultry from less than 2% of all isolates before 1996 to 60% in 2002. Despite exposure to contaminated meat is high, human patients with Java infection are rare (0.3% of all isolates). However, 50% of the human isolates showed PFGE profiles identical to the poultry clone. Resistance to flumequin in S. Java increased from 3% between 1996-2000 to 19% in 2001, and 39% in 2002, while that of other serotypes in poultry remained at about 7%. S. Java is also fast becoming less sensitive to ciprofloxacin.
 

Introduction

Salmonella enterica Paratyphi B variation Java, or simply Java, began to increase alarmingly among chickens and in chicken products in the Netherlands in 2000. This serovar causes gastro-enteritis in humans through the consumption of contaminated food, but it can also be invasive, producing typhus-like clinical symptoms, and lead to outbreaks (1-4). In this article, we try to assess the potential threat to public health associated with the increase of Java among poultry in the Netherlands.


Materials and methods


The National Salmonella Centre (NSC) and the National and European Reference Laboratory (NRL) for Salmonella at RIVM identify all the isolates taken from humans (mostly sent by regional public health laboratories covering 64% of the Dutch population) and animals, from food, animal food, and from the environment. The Food Inspection Department East (KvW, Zutphen) analyses chicken products from butchers, supermarkets, and poultry farmers. Sampling is done in a representative and statistically sound manner (regarding products, points of sale, regions, and seasons) (5). Antibiograms were carried out at NSC until 2001, using the agar diffusion method (ROSCO® tablets). Since 1999, the sensitivity of isolates to various antibiotics has been quantitatively determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) at CIDC-Lelystad. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing was performed on 27 isolates derived from poultry, and 22 from humans, collected between 1998 and 2002, following the Salm-gene scheme (see article pp46-50).

Trends in S. Java in The Netherlands and abroad


Results from the monitoring of chicken products by the KvW show that positive Java samples increased drastically, even though the total percentage of salmonella-positive samples more than halved since 1995 (table 1). In poultry, the proportion of isolates with Java rose from 3% in 1995 to 15% in 1997, and then to 33% in 2000 and 61% in 2002 (figure). The NSC also noted the same increase in products derived from chickens. Although rarely, Java has also been isolated from humans : 51 isolates were received at the NSC between 1996 and 2002 (0.3% of all human isolates).
In 1998 and 2000, information via Enter-net (the European surveillance network for human infections involving salmonella and Verocytotoxin-producing E. coli) revealed a similar low level of salmonellosis due to Java in humans in other European countries. At meetings of the European NRLs in 1999 and 2000, NRL-Berlin and NRL-The Netherlands reported the same development of Java in poultry since 1995, and the explosive increase in 2000 (figure). The NRLs from other European countries considered that this was uniquely a German and Dutch problem. In December 2002, however, Scotland sent out a request for information via Enter-net regarding what seems to be an emerging problem in humans: the infection with multiresistant Java (see article pp35-40).

Table 1
Results of the monitoring of chicken products by the Food Inspection Department, 1995-2002*

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002*
Prélèvements analysés / Samples tested 1359 1325 1314 1077 859 1454 1578 1196
Salmonella spp. positive (%) 34.2 32.6 29,1 20.2 17.6 21 16.3 13.2
Hadar positive (%) 10 5.2 2.9 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.1
Enteritidis positive (%) 6.8 12.1 8,8 nd 4.8 1.4 1.4 0.5
Paratyphi B var. Java positive (%) 0.8 3.4 4,4 2.3 2.4 7.0 7.0 8.1

 


Antimicrobial resistance


The poultry sector in the Netherlands first encountered problems with Java in five chicken farms in 1996. Currently 50-100 farms are battling this infection. Java clones persist despite perfectly adequate quality control scores (8), whereas S. Enteritidis, Hadar, Infantis, Virchow etc, can be successfully eliminated with the standard cleaning and disinfection procedures. Still, Java was no more resistant to disinfectants than other serotypes found in the farms at the same time.
Java isolates found in poultry in the Netherlands are generally multiresistant, in contrast to the other serotypes (table 2). According to the resistance pattern, the human clones isolated from the 1980s until the mid-1990s most closely resemble the genetically diverse and antibiotic-sensitive strains prevalent in 1960-90s (9-11). The poultry isolates until 1995 most likely belong to a group deriving from a few clones multiresistant to chloramphenicol, sulphonamide, tetracycline, trimethoprim and often also kanamycin, neomycin and nalidixic acid (9). The isolates from 1996 onwards most likely derive from a recent clone, which had practically replaced all the others in poultry, and is resistant to trimethoprim in combination, to sulphonamide, streptomycin, nalidixic acid and ampicillin (9). This clone was also found in Germany by molecular typing for two isolates from poultry sent to the NRL-Berlin and, in December 2002 in the Netherlands, for all the 27 preserved Java poultry isolates in 1998-2002.
A worrying development is the rapid increase in resistance of the Java clone against quinolones. Between 1996 and 2000, only 3% was flumequine-resistant, 19% in 2001 and 39% in 2002 (tables 2 and 3). Table 3 shows the shift occurring in the past four years towards higher MIC values for flumequine and ciprofloxacin. No evidence yet exists for clinical resistance to ciprofloxacin, but reduced sensitivity has been demonstrated.
According to German searchers, the development of resistance could be related to the high selection pressure due to vaccination and the intensive use of antibiotics in poultry farming, for example, to control the previous S. Enteritidis crisis (9). In 2000-01, 13% of flocks were treated with a quinolone, mainly flumequine. This resistance has developed much faster in Java than in other serotypes (table 2). The easy spreading of this resistant clones in chickens, and the persistence in the environment once a farm is infected are the likely reasons for the accelerated development of resistance. Besides, the high percentages of resistance (table 2) could be explained by therapeutic treatments of cotrimoxazole. The use of nitrofurans (furazolidone in table 2) has, however, been forbidden for more than 10 years. It seems that clonality of the strains is the determining factor for the (chromosomally determined) high level of resistance to furazolidone.

Transmission to humans


It is unclear why Java (up to now) seems innocuous to humans. However, recent PFGE-typing results show that the multiresistant poultry clone definitely crosses over to humans, which is consistent with the changed resistance pattern of Java among humans (table 2). Eleven out of 22 isolates preserved from the period 1998-2002 had a PFGE pattern identical to that of the Java poultry clone, and two unrelated isolates were associated to foreign travel.

Table 2
Resistance patterns of S. Java isolates from humans and chickens, in 1984-1995 and 1996-2001.

Poulet / Chicken

Homme / Human

Tous les sérotypes à l’exclusion de Java All serotypes excluding Java
S. Java
S. Java

1984–1995
1996–2001
1984–1995
1996–2001
1984–1995
1996–2001

N
N
N
N
N
N

Isolé / Isolated

38506
3718
52
1351
51
44

Testé pour la résistance / Resistance tested

30418
991
37
517
43
13

%
%
%
%
%
%
Tetracycline
7
8
49
7
0
8
Chloramphenicol
1
2
27
1
0
8
Neomycin
1
0
30
0
0
0
Ampicillin
6
9
8
43
0
44
Cotrimoxazole*
2
2(16)
49
64(91)
0
30(54)
Furazolidone
9
10
27
99
0
44
Flumequine
0
7
0
17
0
18

 

Table 3
Resistance development of Salmonella Paratyphi B var. Java isolated
from poultry matériels

Valeur de la CMI /MIC value (µg/mL) 0.015 0.03 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Res %
Ciprofloxacin 99–2000 15 33 11 1 1                 0
  2001   47 10 3 6 7 1             0
  Nov 2002   39 23 4 14 21 6             0
Flumequine 1999-'00           36 11 13 1         3
  2001           40 10 9 1 8 3 3   19
  Nov 2002           38 21 5 2 11 15 15 1 39


Conclusions and recommendations


Until the end of 2002, the spreading of a resistant clone was considered as a local problem. However, in December 2002, a request for information from Scotland about an emerging Java problem in humans, revealed the clone involved could be traced back to isolates from poultry imported from Germany and Holland (see article pp35-40). This may cause a serious public health threat, especially given that fluoroquinolones are the first antibiotics of choice to treat a serious salmonellosis, and puts the problem into an international perspective.
In the Netherlands, public health and veterinary services, research institutes (RIVM, ID Lelystad, the Animal Health Service and KvW), and the poultry industry have initiated coordinated initiatives to address this emerging issue.

 


Références

1. Hartung M. Bericht uber die epidemiologische Situation der Zoonosen in Deutschland fur 1996. (in German) BgVV-Hefte 9/1998 (Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinärmedizin, http://www.bgvv.de/)
2. Breitenfeld V, Aleraj D. Klinische und bakteriologische Eigenschaften der durch Salmonella Java verursachten Salmonellose. (in German). Zentralbl Bakteriol [Orig] 1967; 204: 89-99.
3. Brusin S. An infectious hazard of playing soldiers: outbreak of Salmonella Java infection associated with a paintball event. Eurosurveillance Weekly 1998; 2(27): 980702. (http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/1998/980702.asp)
4. Serjbadam E. Outbreak of Salmonella Paratyphi B Var. Java in Mongolia. WHO Global Salm Surv List Server Message #2000-18. 15 May 2000. (http://www.who.int/emc/diseases/zoo/SALM-SURV/server_messages/message18.html)
5. Van der Zee H, B Wit, de Boer E. Keuringsdienst van Waren Oost, Afdeling signalering, Zutphen. (in Dutch). www.keuringsdienstvanwaren.nl
6. Van Pelt W, Min J, De Wit MAS, Wannet WJB, Van de Giessen AW, van Duynhoven YTHP. Een explosieve toename in Nederland van multiresistente Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in 2001. (in Dutch). Infectieziekten Bulletin 2001; 12(10): 356-62. (http://www.rivm.nl/infectieziektenbulletin/bul1210/salmonella.html)
7. Dorn C, Schroeter A, Miko A, Protz D, Helmuth R. [Increasing number of Salmonella paratyphi B isolates from slaughtered poultry sent in to the national Salmonella reference laboratory.] (in German). Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2001;114: 179-83.
8. Bolder NM. Salmonella Java in poultry: can it not be controlled? Intervention study in the framework of the Action Plan 2000+ Salmonella and Campylobacter in poultry farming (in Dutch). Institute for Animal Science and Health, ID-Lelystad. By order of the production board (PVE) and the Ministry of Agriculture (LNV), March, 2002.
9. Miko A, Guerra B, Schroeter A, Dorn C, Helmuth R. Molecular characterization of multiresistant d-tartrate-positive Salmonella enterica serovar paratyphi B isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 3184-91.
10. Ezquerra E, Burnens C, Jones C, Stanley J. Genotypic typing and phylogenetic analysis of Salmonella Paratyphi B and S. Java with IS200. J Gen Microbiol 1993; 139: 2409-14.
11. Selander RK, Beltran P, Smith NH, Barker RM, Crichton PB, Old DC, et al. Genetic population structure, clonal phylogeny and pathogenicity of Salmonella Paratyphi B. Infect Immun 1990; 58: 1891-901.

 



Back to Table of Contents
en es fr
Previous Next

Disclamer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the Editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither the ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of the ECDC is responsible for the use which might be made of the information in this journal.
Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2008 All rights reserved