Eurosurveillance banner


Eurosurveillance is planning to publish a special issue on Socio-economic determinants and infections diseases in Europe in spring of 2010. For this reason Eurosurveillance invites interested scientists who have research findings in the area to submit papers for review and possible publication.

The data from 27 European Union countries plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway show that considerable progress has been made in preventing and controlling the disease. The number of newly diagnosed cases and the overall notification rate declined continuously in the past decade, and the notification rate in 2007 was 12% lower than in 2003. In spite of this decline, a total of 84,917 new cases of TB were registered in 2007 and a number of challenges hamper the progress towards the elimination of TB in the EU.

A number of bacterial and viral infections in pregnant women can have serious effects on the unborn child leading to impaired mental and physical health later in life. This week’s issue of Eurosurveillance is dedicated to infectious diseases in pregnancy.

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem in many European countries. To mark the very first European Antibiotic Awareness Day, on 18 November, the scientific journal Eurosurveillance runs a series of articles to highlight main aspects of the AMR problem in Europe. They will be published in two issues on 13 and 20 November 2008.

In preparation for the coming influenza season 2008-9, Eurosurveillance publishes a special issue on prevention of influenza by vaccination. Seasonal influenza poses a serious public health threat because of associated serious morbidity and mortality. In Europe, estimates suggest that influenza is responsible for around 40,000 to 220,000 excess deaths, depending on the severity of the epidemic.

Today Eurosurveillance is publishing a special issue dedicated to the widespread advances made in Europe in estimating the real number of newly acquired HIV infections based on an innovative approach called STARHS

To tie in with World Hepatitis Day on 19 May, the scientific journal Eurosurveillance is today publishing a special issue on viral hepatitis, highlighting issues and challenges related to hepatitis B and C.

On 17 April 2008, Eurosurveillance is publishing a special issue with articles on the measles situation in Europe. The publication is linked to European Immunisation Week which runs from 21-27 April.

World Tuberculosis Day on 24 March commemorates the date in 1882 when Robert Koch presented his findings of the causing agent of tuberculosis (TB) – Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In the run up of this day Eurosurveillance publishes a special issue on the situation of TB in Europe.

Today (6 March, 2008), Eurosurveillance, the European peer-reviewed journal of infectious diseases, publishes a special issue on meningococcal disease. It includes two in-depth articles and an editorial by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Monthly Release  1999: Volume 4/ Issue 4 Article 1 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
en es fr it pt
Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 4, Issue 4, 01 April 1999
Surveillance report
European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS): objectives and organisation

Citation style for this article: Bronzwaer SL, Goettsch W, Olsson-Liljequist B, Wale MC, Vatopoulos A, Sprenger MJ. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS): objectives and organisation. Euro Surveill. 1999;4(4):pii=66. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=66
S.L.A.M. Bronzwaer 1, W. Goettsch 1, B. Olsson-Liljequist 2, M.C.J. Wale 3, A.C. Vatopoulos 4, M.J.W. Sprenger 1
1 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2 Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden
3 PHLS Antimicrobial Susceptibility Surveillance Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom
4 Athens University, Athens, Greece

Introduction

‘Effective European surveillance must have the agreement and active involvement of all participants’, concluded a European Union (EU) conference on the need for surveillance of resistant microorganisms (the microbial threat), held in September 1998 in Denmark (1). Patterns of antibiotic resistance differ widely between member states of the EU (2,3). Studies suggest that policies and guidelines on antibiotic usage may affect the prevalence of resistance (4,5). From an epidemiological and methodological standpoint it is very difficult to compare antimicrobial resistance rates because of differences in antimicrobial agents tested, sampling policies, susceptibility test systems used, and breakpoints adopted.

 To obtain more comparable and reliable data, the Directorate General V (DGV) of the European Commission is funding a European antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (EARSS). This system, in which all member states of the EU, plus Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland are taking part (table 1), is coordinated by the Rijksinstituut voor de Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM); the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment of the Netherlands. More than 400 laboratories expressed willingness to take part in this European communicable disease network. This report describes its objectives and organisation.

Table 1 : Participating countries, national coodinators and collaborators in
EARSS

Austria (AT)

H. Mittermayer / W. Koller

Belgium (BE)

H. Goossens / F. van Loock

Denmark (DK)

T. Soerensen / D. Monnet

Finland (FI)

P. Huovinen / O. Lyytikäinen

France (FR)

P. Courvalin / H. Aubry-Damon / J. Drucker

Germany (DE)

W. Witte / F. Tieman

Greece (GR)

N. Legakis / A. Vatopoulos

Iceland (IS)

K. Kristinsson / H. Briem

Ireland (IE)

L. Fenelon / D. O’Flanagan

Italy (IT)

G. Cornaglia / M.L. Moro

Luxembourg (LU)

R. Hemmer

Netherlands (NL)

H. de Neeling / W. Goettsch

Norway (NO)

E. Hoiby / P. Aavitsland

Portugal (PT)

M. Caniça / M. Paixão

Spain (ES)

F. Baquero / J. Campos

Sweden (SE)

O. Cars / B. Olsson-Liljequist

Switzerland (CH)

K. Mühlemann / J. Bille

United Kingdom  (UK)

D. Livermore / M. Wale

Collaborators :

OMS : R.Williams / J. Stelling

ESCMID : I. Phillips / M. Struelens

Project leader

M.J.W. Sprenger

Project coordinator

S.L.A.M. Bronzwaer

 

Objectives

EARSS is an international network of national surveillance systems, which aims to aggregate comparable and reliable antimicrobial resistance data to benefit public health across Europe. Taking into account laboratory methods as well as epidemiological principles, EARSS will explore the feasibility of analysing regional differences, assessing risk factors, and providing electronic feedback in a study of 18 months duration. Microbiologists and epidemiologists from participating countries aim to collect quantitative susceptibility data on penicillin and cephalosporins for community acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae from blood and cerebrospinal fluid; and to collect data on methicillin resistance for Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures.

Organisation

Each participating country has appointed a national representative microbiologist and a representative epidemiologist. These representatives will also work together to analyse the data for other epidemiological studies. One of the representatives from each country acts as the national coordinator. His/her main task is to coordinate activities of the participating laboratories; arrange distribution and collection of questionnaires on susceptibility testing; and to collect and forward resistance data each quarter for international collation. Standardisation and microbiological quality control methods are being developed in consultation with the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). EARSS is a component of the network-of-networks being established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for global surveillance.

Selection of participating laboratories

EARSS recommended that the national coordinators should select enough laboratories in their countries to cover at least 20% of the total population. For community acquired pathogens the catchment population of the laboratories (the number of people living in the area they serve) will be considered as the denominator. The 400 or so laboratories participating in EARSS will cover well over 20% of the population in many countries (figure 1). Most of these laboratories are first-line clinical laboratories, rather than reference laboratories. Academic and non-academic hospitals are represented, and the spectrum extends from nursing homes to tertiary referral hospitals.

 

Fig1.gif (24752 octets)

Epidemiological data

EARSS collects the following information by means of isolate record forms and questionnaires:

  • information about an isolate and its susceptibility test results
  • information about patients
  • information about the laboratory methods used and denominator data
  • data about the hospital(s) served by the laboratory used to generate the denominator.

Isolate record form. This form collects information about patients and isolates. EARSS requires the following information: sex, month and year of birth, date of specimen collection, name or code of hospital, hospital department, origin of patient, isolate specimen number, laboratory code, and antibiotic susceptibility testing results as specified in the protocol. Furthermore, the isolate record form allows other optional data to be collected: patient identifier (ID), clinical diagnosis, and susceptibility for other antibiotics.

Questionnaire on susceptibility testing. This questionnaire asks about test methods used, and collects denominator data from a laboratory and from the hospital(s) it serves. The facilities the hospital offers (intensive care unit, renal, transplant, cardiac surgery) and the number of bed days are requested. For nosocomial pathogens the number of bed days will be considered as the denominator. Data on patients and isolates can be related to information about the laboratory and hospital by means of a unique laboratory code that will be filled out on all isolate record forms and questionnaires. The authors are aware that the catchment population estimated by a laboratory may overestimate the true catchment population. True catchment populations can be calculated using postal codes of the patients from whom isolates are obtained. To preserve confidentiality this must be done at a national level.

Duplicates

To prevent duplicate isolates from being reported, laboratories are asked to send information only about the first isolate of each strain from each patient. These are referred to as ‘patient-isolates’. To be able to correct for duplicate isolates, the isolate record form asks for patient ID/code. This is marked as optional information, since in many countries there are legal limitations on the inclusion of patient identifiers. For the same reason we do not ask for date of birth, but month and year of birth. A code is needed, however, to exclude duplicates at the national level. If a patient identifier cannot be used in a particular country, we ask laboratories to use another (encrypted) code for a specific patient. In countries without legal limitations the national coordinator will use the patient identifier to exclude repeat isolates, removing the identifier before sending data to the central database.

Data processing

Participating laboratories are offered two methods of data entry: electronic and on paper. Details vary from country to country, but if a laboratory opts for electronic data transfer they can use an existing laboratory information system or make use of Whonet (and/or Whonet-Baclink). WHO revised the existing microbiology laboratory database software Whonet4 for EARSS. Laboratories that do not process data electronically will forward the isolate record forms to their national coordinator, who will enter the data and send them each quarter to the RIVM in ASCII format. On receipt, the data will be checked for syntax errors (for example, dates and test results), and linked to denominator information collected by means of the questionnaire on susceptibility testing. After this validation, tables, figures, and geographical maps can be generated and published on an internet site. The aggregated data sets will also be used for more complex epidemiological studies, for example investigating relationships between geographical locations and antibiotic resistance.

Feedback

Sufficient and timely feedback is essential for all surveillance systems. As well as information letters and a newsletter, data will be shared using the electronic infrastructure ‘Interchange of Data between Administrations’ (IDA) network of the EU. Within IDA an internet application will be developed to enable participating laboratories to export their ASCII data to the central EARSS database and to obtain selected information from the central database.

Quarterly feedback will be given on:

  • the total number of S. aureus cases in blood and the proportion that are methicillin resistant (MRSA)
  • prevalence of MRSA cases in blood per 100 patients
  • incidence of MRSA cases in blood per 1000 patient days
  • prevalence of oxacillin (penicillin) resistance of S. pneumoniae cases in blood and cerebrospinal fluid
  • quarterly incidence of penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae cases in blood and cerebrospinal fluid per million population during the study.

Results

About 400 laboratories will take part by sending data via national coordinators to the central EARSS database. Data collection began in some countries on 1 October 1998, and the first results are expected in April 1999. An EARSS manual that is downloadable from the website has been prepared, and a printed booklet is being distributed to participating laboratories.

Conclusion

In developing the protocol and questionnaire, the challenge was to balance scientific validity and feasibility. A first result is that consensus has been reached by leading microbiologists and epidemiologists on the protocol and logistical framework. EARSS is already acting as a catalyst for national surveillance systems.

For more information: see the EARSS website (http://www.earss.rivm.nl), contact the project coordinator Stef Bronzwaer (info.earss@rivm.nl), or a national coordinator by means of an email addresses on the website.

 


References

1. Thamdrup Rosdahl V, Borge Pederson K. Report from the invitational EU conference on ‘the microbial threat’. September 1998. (http://www.microbial.threat.dk)

2. Rahal K, Wang F, Schindler J, Rowe B, Cookson B, Houvinen P, et al. Reports on surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in individual countries. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24 (Suppl 1): S69-75.

3. Kresken M, Wiedemann B. Development of resistance in the past decade in central Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 18(suppl C): 235-42.

4. Seppala H, Klaukka T, Vuopio-Varkila J, Muotiala A, Helenius H, Lager K, et al. The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 441-6.

5. Pradier, C, Dunais H, Carsenti-Etesse, Dellamonica P. Pneumococcal resistance in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997; 16: 644-7.

 



Back to Table of Contents
en es fr it pt
Next

Disclamer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the Editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither the ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of the ECDC is responsible for the use which might be made of the information in this journal.
Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2008 All rights reserved