Towards a standard HIV post exposure prophylaxis for healthcare workers
in Europe
The transmission of HIV from patient to
healthcare worker in an occupational setting was first documented in 1984 (1). In
countries that have surveillance and HIV testing systems to recognise occupationally
acquired cases, over 100 cases of HIV transmission after an occupational exposure were
reported worldwide up to June 1999 (2). Antiretroviral drugs are used for post-exposure
prophylaxis (PEP), and zidovudine alone is said to reduce transmission of HIV by 81% (3),
but failures of PEP have been documented (4). The European Commission has recently
funded a project to develop guidelines for the standardised management of occupational
exposures to HIV/bloodborne infections and evaluation of PEP in Europe. The EuRoPEP
(European Registry of Post-Exposure Prophylaxis) project is coordinated by the Istituto
Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive, Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome, and involves a group of
expert representatives from Croatia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain,
Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The group presented two abstracts at the XIV
International AIDS Conference in Barcelona, Spain (7-12 July 2002, http://www.aids2002.com/). The first assessed current
policies and practice for the management of occupational exposures and PEP (5); the second
aimed to provide a set of recommendations based on a review of national management
strategies as discussed during a consensus meeting (6), and copies are available on
request: (irapep@inmi.it).
Of the nine countries participating in
the study, all had current guidelines and systems for surveillance of occupational
exposure to HIV. The time limit for using PEP ranged from 24 hours to 2 weeks after
exposure. The guidelines propose discouraging PEP after 72 hours.
All nine countries routinely recommend
three antiretroviral drugs as PEP, four countries, however, had the option for dual
antiretrovirals as PEP, based on an assessment of risk. The guidelines propose three drug
PEP routinely, with the clinical decision on whether PEP is to be given based on
assessment of the exposure, material, and source risk factors (table 1) (6).
Table1. Proposed European recommendations
for post-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection in healthcare workers.
Recommendations
|
|
According to exposure
|
Post Exposure Prophylaxis
|
percutaneous
injury |
Recommended |
exposure of
mucous membrane |
Considered |
exposure of
non intact skin |
Considered |
exposure of
intact skin |
Discouraged |
Bite |
Considered |
| |
According to material:
|
Blood |
Recommended |
body
materials containing visible blood |
Recommended |
cerebrospinal
fluid |
Recommended |
concentrated
virus in a research lab. or production facility |
Recommended |
semen;
vaginal secretions; synovial, pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, or amniotic fluid, and
tissues |
Considered |
urine,
vomit, saliva, faeces, tears, sweat, sputum |
Discouraged |
| |
According to source patient:
|
known to be
HIV infected |
Recommended |
serostatus
unknown
Inform the source patient and ask for
informed consent to HIV testing.
Assure immediate results in
order to prevent unnecessary initiation of PEP.
Rapid HIV antibody test could be useful
for diagnosis of HIV infection in source patient. |
Considered |
who denies
his/her consent to HIV test
Consider the likelihood of HIV infection
in the source |
|
|
|
HIV
seronegative
In the absence of clinical or
epidemiological likelihood of HIV infection in the source patient, p24 HIV antigen testing
or biomolecular assays are not recommended. |
|
Click here to view table in new window
The proposed standard initial PEP regime
recommends zidovudine 300mg + lamivudine 150mg (or Combivir 1 capsule) + nelfinavir 1,250
mg orally, twice a day. Nevirapine is not recommended as part of the standard four week
PEP regimen because of its severe adverse reactions (7). None of the nine countries
routinely included nevirapine as part of standard PEP.
All countries routinely performed follow
up testing at baseline, between one to three months and six months, with two countries
performing a further test at one year (5).
The proposed guidelines recommend testing
at baseline, four, 12, and 24 weeks, with additional monitoring at week one and two as
compliance with and tolerance of the regimen can highlight adverse reactions and potential
toxicity (6).
The recommendation to perform rapid HIV
antibody testing of the source patient, to identify those who are not HIV infected, will
reduce the inappropriate use of PEP.
The overall aim of the EuRoPEP project is
to improve the outcome for healthcare workers exposed to HIV. EuRoPEP shows that there are
many similarities in management of exposed healthcare workers from the nine European
countries involved, but a number of differences remain. EuRoPEPs proposed
recommendations provide a way to harmonise the management of PEP and surveillance data in
Europe. The proposed guidelines seek to maximise the effect of PEP, minimise the adverse
reactions, and reduce the use of PEP in incidents where it is not appropriate.
1.
Needlestick transmission of HTLV-III from a
patient infected in Africa [editorial]. Lancet 1984; 2 :1376-7.
2.
PHLS AIDS & STD Centre at CDSC. Occupational transmission of HIV: Summary of
published reports. London: PHLS; December 1999 edition. (http://www.phls.co.uk/topics_az/hiv_and_sti/publications/hiv_octr_1999.pdf)
3.
Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, et al. A
case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous
exposure. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Needlestick Surveillance Group. N
Eng J Med 1997;337:1485-1490. (http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/337/21/1485)
4.
Hawkins DA, Asboe D, Barlow K, Evans B. Seroconversion to HIV-1 following a
needlestick injury despite combination post-exposure prophylaxis. J Infect 2001;43:
12-5. (click
here)
5.
Cicalini S, Antunes F Balslev U, Bernasconi E, Boaventura JL, Campins M, et al.
Management of post-exposure prophylaxis after occupational exposure to HIV in healthcare
workers in Europe XIV International AIDS Conference,
Barcelona, July 7-12 2002. (Abstract LbOr01A.) (click
here)
6.
Puro V, Cicalini S, Schonwald S, Baslev U, Lot F, Marcus U, et al, on behalf
of EuRoPEP. Proposed European Recommendation for post-exposure prophylaxis against HIV
Infection in healthcare workers. XIV International AIDS
Conference, Barcelona, July 7-12 2002. (Abstract LbOr01B.) (click
here)
7.
CDC. Serious adverse events attributed to nevirapine regimes for post-exposure
prophylaxis after HIV exposures -- worldwide, 1997-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2001; 49; 1153-6. (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr//preview/mmwrhtml/mm4951a1.htm)