Eurosurveillance banner




Announcements
Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2012: Volume 17/ Issue 33 Article 4 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf) Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 17, Issue 33, 16 August 2012
Letters
Syphilis and the Internet
  1. Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Ulm, Germany

Citation style for this article: Noll-Hussong M. Syphilis and the Internet. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(33):pii=20249. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20249
Date of submission: 14 August 2012

To the editor: Based on surveillance data generated from national laboratory findings collected by the Robert Koch Institute, Bremer et al. [1] demonstrated that there was an increase in the incidence of syphilis in Germany in 2011. In their article, the authors focused on the persuasive power of traditional microbiologically-confirmed data. However, a recently evolving ’social’ surveillance tool could also be considered: Internet search engine analytics.

The power of search engine analytics to detect infectious diseases (e.g. influenza) has been demonstrated [2], and it would make sense that this tool would be useful in the surveillance of other contagious diseases [3], especially sexually transmitted infections (STI). The ongoing stigmatisation of STIs, the perceived anonymity of Internet usage, and last but not least, the habits of the primary risk group, i.e. men who have sex with men (MSM) [4], who utilise the Internet to find sexual partners, makes it seem obvious that many individuals, when recognising new suspect symptoms, will first and foremost use information provided on the Internet, which is easily accessible via search engines. Indeed, and despite the inherent problems with Internet-based digital data retrieval [5], the interest for syphilis over time, in terms of web searches, can be for example investigated with Google Insights for Search (http://www.google.com/insights/search/) by enquiring on the search term ‘syphilis’, in Germany from 2004 to present, within the category ‘Sexually Transmitted Diseases’. This allows graphical visualisation of the level of interest for ‘syphilis’ relative to that for ´Sexually Transmitted Diseases´ over this period in Germany. An increase in the searches for ‘syphilis’ relative to ‘Sexually Transmitted Diseases´ can be observed from mid-2010.

Because, for example, various efforts to establish an effective partner notification system for syphilis patients have had differing levels of success, new methods for limiting or preventing the spread of syphilis should be developed, and these new methods should take into consideration the habits and reachability of young males in the 21st century. For example, when a person searches for the selected term, the top search results can be presented in the form of suggestions for counselling or therapy using the search patterns that Google computes for each of its search engine users for marketing purposes. In this scenario, these patterns would not be used for marketing but to promote health.


References 
  1. Bremer V, Marcus U, Hamouda O. Syphilis on the rise again in Germany - results from surveillance data for 2011. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(29):pii=20222. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20222
  2. Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L et al. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature. 2009;457(7232):1012-4.
  3. Hulth A, Rydevik G. GET WELL: an automated surveillance system for gaining new epidemiological knowledge. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:252.
  4. Van de Laar M, Spiteri G. Increasing trends of gonorrhoea and syphilis and the threat of drug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(29):pii=20225. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20225
  5. Brownstein JS, Freifeld CC, Madoff LC. Digital disease detection--harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(21):2153-5, 2157.

 


 



Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf) Next

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2013. All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.