Eurosurveillance banner



In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Weekly Release  2005: Volume 10/ Issue 19 Article 3 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Previous

Eurosurveillance, Volume 10, Issue 19, 12 May 2005
Articles

Citation style for this article: Stantic-Pavlinic M, Jenko I. Trends in rabies post-exposure prophylaxis given in Slovenia. Euro Surveill. 2005;10(19):pii=2703. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=2703

Trends in rabies post-exposure prophylaxis given in Slovenia

Mirjana Stantic-Pavlinic (stantic@bigfoot.com) and Irena Jenko, Institute of Public Health of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Between 1992 and 2002, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was given to 86 Slovenian travellers returning from abroad and 2011 people potentially exposed in Slovenia. During this time, there was a significant increase in prophylaxis given to returning international travellers, but no significant change in annual prophylaxis given to those potentially exposed in Slovenia. Most of those people returning from abroad who required PEP, had travelled to regions where rabies is enzootic (endemic in animals), and had been bitten most often by dogs, monkeys or cats.

There are only a few human cases of rabies in Europe reported each year, mainly in travellers returning from abroad [1-3]. The rabies situation in humans is generally under control [4-6] except of rare human rabies cases in European part of Russia, Turkey and Romania. In Slovenia, when a patient reports an animal bite, the risk of rabies virus infection is assessed by an antirabies centre using a standardized questionnaire. Inactivated rabies vaccine (Rabivac, Chiron Vaccines, Germany) and human rabies immunoglobulin produced by Chiron, Marburg or Imunuloški Zavod, Zagreb, are used for PEP.

The incidence of rabies PEP in Slovenia per 100 000 population was calculated using annual population numbers from the Statistical Office of the Slovenian Republic. Time trend analysis was performed to detect an association between the year and the number of cases, and PEP incidence separately in domestic populations and international travellers.The average age of travellers was 34 years (range: 3 - 95), 46 males and 40 females (Table 1).

Table 1. Annual incidence per 100 000 population of post-exposure treatment against rabies, Ljubljana region, 1992-2002

Year   1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
International travellers from Slovenia Number 4 7 1 6 8 4 3 6 16 15 16
Incidence 0.7 1.2 0.2 1 1.3 0.7 0.5 1 2.7 2.5 2.7
Domestic Number 185 221 186 232 185 133 133 181 211 183 161
Incidence 31.2 37.3 31.4 39.5 30.9 22.6 22.3 30.4 35.2 30.4 26.7

From 1992-2002, there was a four-fold increase in PEP given to international travellers, from 0.7 in 1992 to 2.7 per 100 000 population in 2002. This increase happened mainly in 2000, 2001 and 2002 and we suspect that this is due to recent increased tourism to south Asia, and increasing awareness of rabies among tourists traveling to Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina [7].

Slovenian travellers were treated after returning from:

  • Croatia (35 patients)
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (14 patients)
  • Italy (5 patients)
  • Thailand (4 patients)
  • Gibraltar, Hungary, Romania, Peru, Serbia, Sri Lanka and Austria – 2 cases per country
  • Burundi, China, Egypt, France, Gambia, Ghana, Greece, India, Kenya, Malaysia, Russia, Tunisia, Turkey and the United States– 1 case per country

Travellers were bitten by a number of different animals, mostly dogs whose owners were unknown (Table 2). Dog bites were the most common reason for rabies PEP being given in both groups (72% of travellers and 64% of domestic cases).

Table 2. Animal sources of suspect rabies exposure in international travellers from Slovenia

Animal Dog Monkey Cat Rat Fox Squirrel Racoon Horse Hedgehog Bat All
Number of cases 62 10 6 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 86
Percentage of all cases 72.1 11.6 7.0 2.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 100

This growth in tourism is expected to result in more imported cases of rabies. Pre-exposure rabies vaccination coverage and awareness of rabies risk in international travellers to rabies-endemic areas, especially those where rabies prophylaxis facilities are poor, still needs to be improved.

Worldwide, most human deaths from rabies occur in Asia, Africa and South America. Slovenian travellers were most often potentially exposed in the popular tourist destination of Croatia, where rabies is enzootic but where there are well-developed programmes of post-exposure treatment for humans. There were 633 laboratory-confirmed cases of rabies in animals in Croatia in 2003 [8], and this situation did not improve substantially in 2004. Cases of laboratory-confirmed rabies in animals in Slovenia still occur, but after the introduction of aeroplane-assisted wildlife vaccination, cases in wild animals dropped from 1089 in 1995 [5] to 8 in 2003 [8].

Rabies is almost 100% vaccine preventable. For pre-exposure and post-exposure treatment of travellers, only cell culture-prepared rabies vaccine is used in Slovenia, because it provides a high level of protection and has low rates of side effects [9-11].

References:
  1. Rotivel Y, Bourhy H, Wirth S, Goundal M, Tsiang H. Imported human rabies cases in France.Rabies bulletin Europe 1997; 4:14.
  2. WHO. Imported human rabies case – Sweden. Rabies Bulletin Europe 2001;25(1):10. (http://www.who-rabies-bulletin.org/q1_2001/frame1_01.html)
  3. Summer R, Ross S, Kiehl W. Imported case of rabies in Germany from India. Eurosurveillance Weekly 2004; 8(46): 11/11/2004 (http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2004/041111.asp#4)
  4. Stantic-Pavlinic M. How dangerous is the European bat lyssavirus? Wien Klin Wochenschr 2003; 115(1-2):3-5. (http://www.springer.at/periodicals/article_pdf/xxxxxxxxx228xxxxxx294109_1.pdf#search='How%20dangerous%20is%20the%20European%20bat%20lyssavirus')
  5. Stantic-Pavlinic M, Hostnik P. Animal rabies and post-exposure treatment of humans in Slovenia. Vet Arh 2002; 72(3):151-7. (http://www.vef.hr/vetarhiv/papers/72-3/stantic.pdf)
  6. Müller WW. Review of Reported Rabies Case Data in Europe to the WHO Collaborating Centre Tübingen from 1977 to 2000. Rabies Bulletin Europe 2001; 24(4): 11-9. (http://www.who-rabies-bulletin.org/q4_2000/frame4_00.html)
  7. Croft A, Archer R. Dog bites in Bosnia. Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47(420):435-7. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9281871&itool=iconabstr)
  8. WHO. Summary of Rabies Cases in Europe (4th Quarter 2003, Total 2003). Rabies Bulletin Europe. 2003;27 (4):4. (http://www.who-rabies-bulletin.org/q4_2004/startq4_04.html)
  9. WHO Recommendations on Rabies Post-Exposure Treatment and the Correct Technique of Intradermal Immunization against Rabies. WHO/EMZlZOO.96.6. (http://www.who.int/emc-documents/rabies/whoemczoo966c.htm)
  10. WHO Rabies vaccines. WER 2002;77: 109-19. (http://www.who.int/vaccines-documents/PP-WER/wer7714.pdf)
  11. WHO.Rabies, Asia. WER 2001;76:320-3. (http://www.who.int/docstore/wer/pdf/2001/wer7641.pdf)

back to top



Back to Table of Contents
Previous

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the Editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither the ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of the ECDC is responsible for the use which might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our Website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2008 All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.