Eurosurveillance, Volume
11, Issue
10,
01 October 2006
Editorial
Measles elimination 2010 target: the need to meet the specific risk group
J. S. Spika1
Citation style for this article: Spika JS. Measles elimination 2010 target: the need to meet the specific risk group. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(10):pii=648. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=648
Date of submission:
|
John S. Spika, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
| |
| Substantial progress has been made within the World
Health Organization European Region in recent years towards the measles
and rubella elimination targets for 2010. These 2010 targets were set in
2005 by the WHO European Regional Office for Europe, following the approval
of the Resolution EUR/RC55/R7 [1,2]. In 2005, 28 (54%) of 52 WHO member
states reported a measles incidence of < 1 per million population (one
indicator for measuring measles elimination status) and by 2006, 50 (96%)
had introduced rubella vaccine into their national programmes. In 2002,
member states began reporting measles cases by age and vaccination status
to WHO on a monthly basis [3] and case-based reporting was implemented
in 2003. Since that time, the number of countries reporting case-based
data has increased from one in 2003 to 23 in 2006. In 2006, countries have
been asked to report rubella cases monthly (either aggregate or case-based).
The WHO European Region measles/rubella laboratory network has also been
strengthened through regular laboratory assessments and proficiency testing
and by having subregional meetings.
The past two years have been challenging, with several large outbreaks
in the European Region. The outbreaks in Romania and the Ukraine
[4] were the source of measles outbreaks in a number of EU countries,
including Estonia, Germany, Lithuania, Portugal, Poland and Spain.
These primary and secondary outbreaks have identified susceptible
people in some countries which had already achieved very good levels
of measles control. The outbreaks have also demonstrated the current
capacity for investigation at the local level, including the collection
of laboratory specimens for virus isolation/ detection, and the
capabilities of the measles/rubella laboratory network for tracking
specific measles virus genotypes and subtypes.
The paper in this issue of Eurosurveillance [5] describing the measles
outbreak in La Rioja identifies some of the challenges faced by countries
in the European Region as we move towards measles elimination. All countries
need to have strong epidemiological surveillance in place to detect importations
rapidly and allow quick response to outbreaks when they occur. The ability
to epidemiologically and virologically link measles cases with a source
is critical for assessing the interruption of endemic transmission within
and between countries in the European Region. The D6 measles virus genotype
causing disease in La Rioja was genetically identical to the strain causing
disease in the Ukraine, based on the sequence of the 450 nucleotides
of the C-terminus of the N (nucleoprotein) gene, the single most variable
part of the measles genome.
The importance of healthcare workers being immune to measles is
demonstrated in the La Rioja outbreak. Many healthcare workers
may have received none or only one dose of measles vaccine, yet
they have not been exposed to measles because virus circulation
has diminished with vaccine use. Ensuring that all healthcare workers
are adequately protected is key to preventing healthcare-associated
infections. Immunisation records of healthcare workers should be
reviewed and careful consideration given to ensuring that all have
received two doses of measles vaccine, unless they were born well
before measles vaccine was introduced.
The high proportion of measles cases observed in children aged
15 months or younger is noteworthy, given this is younger than
the recommended age in La Rioja for the first dose of measles vaccine.
The most effective primary prevention strategies for measles among
those younger than the age of first dose are to ensure high levels
of immunity among older siblings and caregivers. Outbreaks such
as the one in La Rioja require that public health officials develop
interventions customised to meet the specific risk group based
on a thorough epidemiological investigation. Once the decision
has been taken to immunise infants at an age younger than the routine
first dose, it is also necessary to decide when the practice should
be discontinued. Outbreaks such as this could justify the decision
for countries where the first dose of measles vaccine is currently
given at 12 months not to further postpone the age of first dose,
at least until measles has been eliminated in the European Region.
|
|
|
References
1- Resolution EUR/RC55/R7: Strengthening national immunization systems
through measles and rubella elimination and prevention of congenital
rubella infection in WHO’s European Region [http://www.euro.who.int/Governance/resolutions/2005/20050920_3]
2- Eliminating measles and rubella and prevention congenital rubella
infection, WHO European Region strategic plan 2005-2010 [available at: http://www.euro.who.int/vaccine/20030808_4 in
English, French, German and Russian].
3- Hanon FX, J. Spika JS, Wassilak Steven S, Emiroglu N. WHO European
Region's strategy for elimination of measles and congenital rubella infection.
Euro Surveill 2003;8(6):129-130. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/em/v08n06/0806-222.asp?langue=02&]
4- Spika JS, Aidyralieva C, L Mukharskaya L, Kostyuchenko NN, Mulders
M, Lipskaya G, Emiroglu N. Measles outbreak in the Ukraine, 2005-2006.
Euro Surveill. 2006;11(3):E060309.1 Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2006/060309.asp#1
5- Perucha M, Ramalle-Gómara E, Lezaun ME, Blanco A, Quiñones
C, Blasco M et al. A measles outbreak in children under 15 months of
age in La Rioja, Spain, 2005-2006. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(10). Available
from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/em/v11n10/1110-222.asp
|
Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the Editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither the ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of the ECDC is responsible for the use which might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our Website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.
Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2008 All rights reserved