1887
Rapid communication Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

On 12 June 2015, was identified in a skin swab from a burns patient in Scotland. The isolate was confirmed to be genotypically and phenotypically toxigenic. Multilocus sequence typing of three patient isolates yielded sequence type ST 125. The patient was clinically well. We summarise findings of this case, and results of close contact identification and screening: 12 family and close contacts and 32 hospital staff have been found negative for .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30088
2015-12-10
2017-11-22
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30088
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/20/49/eurosurv-20-49-2.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30088&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Public Health England. Immunisation against infectious diseases: The Green Book. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/immunisation-against-infectious-disease-the-green-book [Cited 09/12/2015]
  2. Diphtheria Guidelines Working Group. (March 2015). Public health control and management of diphtheria in England and Wales. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diphtheria-public-health-control-and-management-in-england-and-wales [Cited 04/08/2015]
  3. Bolt F, Cassiday P, Tondella ML, Dezoysa A, Efstratiou A, Sing A, et al. Multilocus sequence typing identifies evidence for recombination and two distinct lineages of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(11):4177-85.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00274-10  PMID: 20844217 
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2015). Breakpoints available from: http://clsi.org/ [Cited 04/08/2015]
  5. Mandell B. Dolin. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Press 2001.
  6. Moore LS, Leslie A, Meltzer M, Sandison A, Efstratiou A, Sriskandan S. Corynebacterium ulcerans cutaneous diphtheria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(9):1100-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00225-X  PMID: 26189434 
  7. Galazka A. The changing epidemiology of diphtheria in the vaccine era. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(1) Suppl 1;S2-9.  https://doi.org/10.1086/315533  PMID: 10657184 
  8. Both L, Collins S, de Zoysa A, White J, Mandal S, Efstratiou A. Molecular and epidemiological review of toxigenic diphtheria infections in England between 2007 and 2013. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(2):567-72.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03398-14  PMID: 25502525 
  9. Public Health England. Diphtheria in England and Wales: 2014. Health Protection Report Volume 9 Number 18 Published on: 22 May 2015 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/429678/hpr1815_dphthr.pdf [Cited 04/08/2015]
  10. Public Health England. Infection Reports. Health Protection Report Volume 8 Number 12 Published on: 28 March 2014 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/326923/hpr1214.pdf [Cited 04/08/2015]
  11. Fry N. Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference Unit. Public Health England. Personal Communication. 04/08/2015.
  12. Scotland HP. Annual Data Reports, 2012 & 2013. http://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/publichealthact/AnnualData.aspx [Cited 17/08/2015]
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30088
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Comment has been disabled for this content
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error