1887
Research Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although electronic health records are increasingly used for automated surveillance (AS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), implementation is still a challenge. To develop more targeted implementation initiatives across Europe, knowledge about the current state of AS and potential to implement AS systems is needed.

AIM

To assess the adoption and feasibility of AS based on the 2022–2023 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Point Prevalence Survey (PPS).

METHODS

The 2022–2023 ECDC PPS included questions on the degree of AS and digital data storage for seven HAIs. Descriptive analyses of the responses were performed and stratified by geographic region and hospital characteristics. Categorical variables were analysed as such and converted to ordinal scales.

RESULTS

Overall, 992 hospitals from 24 European countries participated. Across all seven HAIs, fully manual surveillance was the most common method (from healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) 38.8% to infection (CDI) 45.4%). A considerable proportion, i.e. 19.3% (HAP) to 29.8% (CDI), employed some form of automation (automated denominator 5.3–11.3%; semi-automated 12.2–16.9%; fully automated 1.8–2.9%). Many hospitals not employing AS had required source data digitally stored. Generally, tertiary hospitals had higher levels of automation and digital data storage compared with other hospital types. Smaller hospitals (≤ 250 beds) had lower levels of automation, but a similar level of digital data storage compared with larger hospitals.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights variability in AS implementation and digital potential across European hospitals and underscores the need for targeted strategies to advance AS adoption and optimise surveillance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.19.2500736
2026-05-14
2026-06-10
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.19.2500736
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/31/19/eurosurv-31-19-3.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.19.2500736&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cassini A, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Blank HP, Ducomble T, et al. Burden of six healthcare-associated infections on european population health: estimating incidence-based disability-adjusted life years through a population prevalence-based modelling study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002150.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002150  PMID: 27755545 
  2. Harris A, Pineles L, Perencevich E. Recognising the value of infection prevention and its role in addressing the antimicrobial resistance crisis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(8):683-6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005982  PMID: 28003479 
  3. Suetens C, Latour K, Kärki T, Ricchizzi E, Kinross P, Moro ML, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: results from two European point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(46):1800516.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.46.1800516  PMID: 30458912 
  4. Shenoy ES, Branch-Elliman W. Automating surveillance for healthcare-associated infections: Rationale and current realities (Part I/III). Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023;3(1):e25.  https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.312  PMID: 36865706 
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Surveillance in emergencies. Geneva: WHO. [Accessed: 26 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/surveillance
  6. Abbas M, de Kraker MEA, Aghayev E, Astagneau P, Aupee M, Behnke M, et al. Impact of participation in a surgical site infection surveillance network: results from a large international cohort study. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102(3):267-76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.003  PMID: 30529703 
  7. Li Y, Gong Z, Lu Y, Hu G, Cai R, Chen Z. Impact of nosocomial infections surveillance on nosocomial infection rates: A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2017;42:164-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.065  PMID: 28476543 
  8. Storr J, Twyman A, Zingg W, Damani N, Kilpatrick C, Reilly J, et al. Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(1):6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0149-9  PMID: 28078082 
  9. Price L, MacDonald J, Melone L, Howe T, Flowers P, Currie K, et al. Effectiveness of national and subnational infection prevention and control interventions in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):e159-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30479-6  PMID: 29100898 
  10. van Mourik MSM, Perencevich EN, Gastmeier P, Bonten MJM. Designing surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in the era of automation and reporting mandates. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(6):970-6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix835  PMID: 29514241 
  11. Brekelmans M, Hopmans T, van Mourik M, de Greeff S, Swillens J, van Rooden S. Evaluation of a multifaceted implementation strategy for semi-automated surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a multicentre pilot study in the Netherlands. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024;13(1):63.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01418-0  PMID: 38872201 
  12. van Mourik MSM, van Rooden SM, Abbas M, Aspevall O, Astagneau P, Bonten MJM, et al. PRAISE: providing a roadmap for automated infection surveillance in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(Suppl 1):S3-19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.028  PMID: 34217466 
  13. Eisenmann M, Spreckelsen C, Rauschenberger V, Krone M, Kampmeier S. A qualitative, multi-centre approach to the current state of digitalisation and automation of surveillance in infection prevention and control in German hospitals. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024;13(1):78.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01436-y  PMID: 39020438 
  14. Aghdassi SJS, Goodarzi H, Gropmann A, Clausmeyer J, Geffers C, Piening B, et al. Surgical site infection surveillance in German hospitals: a national survey to determine the status quo of digitalization. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):49.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01253-9  PMID: 37208780 
  15. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). POWI ORTHOpedie (PAS ORTHO) - PREZIES. [PREZIES Automation Surveillance: SSI ORTHOpedics (PAS ORTHO)]. Bilthoven: RIVM. [Accessed: 26 Jan 2025]. Dutch. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/prezies/pas-ortho
  16. eSundhed. Healthcare-Associated Infections Database - HAIBA. København: Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. [Accessed: 26 Jan 2025]. Danish. Available from: https://miba.ssi.dk/overvaagningssystemer/haiba
  17. Aghdassi SJS, van der Werff SD, Catho G, Brekelmans M, Peña Diaz LA, Buetti N, et al. Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals, 2018 to 2022. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(24):2400613.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.24.2400613  PMID: 40539312 
  18. Picard J, Nkoumazok B, Arnaud I, Verjat-Trannoy D, Astagneau P. Comorbidities directly extracted from the hospital database for adjusting SSI risk in the new national semiautomated surveillance system in France: The SPICMI network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024;45(1):27-34.  https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.123  PMID: 37529839 
  19. Grammatico-Guillon L, Miliani K, Banaei-Bouchareb L, Solomiac A, Sambour J, May-Michelangeli L, et al. A computerized indicator for surgical site infection (SSI) assessment after total hip or total knee replacement: The French ISO-ORTHO indicator. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(9):1171-8.  https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.371  PMID: 34496983 
  20. Sentís A, Dalby T, Plachouras D, Rodrigues AP, Hooiveld M, Kärki T, et al. P3925 First steps in establishing EU/EEA level surveillance of bloodstream infections from electronic health records. In: 34th ECCMID. Barcelona: ESCMID; 2024. p. 46-7.
  21. Plachouras D. SO857 Multinational electronic surveillance systems for bloodstream infections in EU/EEA. In: 34th ECCMID. Barcelona: ESCMID; 2024. p. 72-3.
  22. Verberk JDM, Aghdassi SJS, Abbas M, Nauclér P, Gubbels S, Maldonado N, et al. Automated surveillance systems for healthcare-associated infections: results from a European survey and experiences from real-life utilization. J Hosp Infect. 2022;122:35-43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.021  PMID: 35031393 
  23. Streefkerk HRA, Verkooijen RP, Bramer WM, Verbrugh HA. Electronically assisted surveillance systems of healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(2):1900321.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.2.1900321  PMID: 31964462 
  24. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals 2011-2012. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/healthcare-associated-infections-antimicrobial-use-PPS.pdf
  25. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European long-term care facilities 2016-2017. Stockholm: ECDC; 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/healthcare-associated-infections-antimicrobial-use-long-term-care-facilities-2016-2017.pdf
  26. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals 2022-2023. Stockholm: ECDC; 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/healthcare-associated-point-prevalence-survey-acute-care-hospitals-2022-2023.pdf
  27. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals – protocol version 6.1. Stockholm: ECDC; 2022. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/antimicrobial-use-healthcare-associated-infections-point-prevalence-survey-version6-1.pdf
  28. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Policy on data submission, access, and use of data within TESSY. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 26 Mar 2025]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/TESSy-policy-amended-2023.pdf
  29. United Nations (UN). Methodology - Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). New York: UN. [Accessed: 26 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49
  30. Tsioutis C, Birgand G, Bathoorn E, Deptula A, Ten Horn L, Castro-Sánchez E, et al. Education and training programmes for infection prevention and control professionals: mapping the current opportunities and local needs in European countries. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):183.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00835-1  PMID: 33168085 
  31. Denkel LA, Arnaud I, Brekelmans M, Puig-Asensio M, Amin H, Gubbels S, et al. Automated surveillance for surgical site infections (SSI) in hospitals and surveillance networks-expert perspectives for implementation. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024;13(1):155.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01505-2  PMID: 39716285 
  32. van Rooden SM, van der Werff SD, van Mourik MSM, Lomholt F, Møller KL, Valk S, et al. Federated systems for automated infection surveillance: a perspective. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024;13(1):113.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01464-8  PMID: 39334278 
  33. Schwabe D, Becker K, Seyferth M, Klaß A, Schaeffter T. The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7(1):203.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4  PMID: 39097662 
  34. Mitchell BG, Hall L, Halton K, MacBeth D, Gardner A. Time spent by infection control professionals undertaking healthcare associated infection surveillance: A multi-centred cross sectional study. Infect Dis Health. 2016;21(1):36-40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2016.03.003 
  35. European Union (EU). European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS). Brussels: EU. [Accessed: 10 Feb 2025]. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space_en
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.19.2500736
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error