1887
  1. Home
  2. Eurosurveillance
  3. Volume 31, Issue 20, 21/May/2026
  4. Article
Research Open Access
Like 0
Download

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) was detected in the Netherlands in 2015. Current monitoring through serology in deer, tick collection and reported human cases, may underestimate areas of virus circulation. Including estimates of suitability of the habitat for TBEV can guide risk-based monitoring.

AIM

We aimed to improve the accuracy of the TBEV distribution map by adding estimates of TBEV habitat suitability to guide targeted tick monitoring in newly identified risk regions.

METHODS

Habitat suitability for TBEV was assessed by calculating the basic reproduction number (R) for 1 km2 grid cells aggregating various data sources for tick hosts such as mice or voles, tick abundance and TBEV transmission. The importance of different tick hosts was determined in scenario analyses. The baseline scenario was validated against data on seropositive roe deer and TBEV-positive ticks and rodents.

RESULTS

The suitability (R ≥ 1) was associated with tick habitat suitability and the abundance of competent host species. Variation in competent host densities had a greater effect on R estimates than incompetent hosts. Monitoring data corresponded well with model-predicted high-risk areas and confirmed further spread of TBEV.

CONCLUSION

The TBEV suitability map is a useful tool for targeted sentinel surveillance by identifying new risk areas, informing local municipal health services of endemic areas for potential human exposure. Our results support targeted efforts for awareness, preparedness and outbreak response, even in regions where TBEV has not yet been detected. Integrating One Health monitoring with spatial modelling can strengthen preparedness in emerging TBEV regions.

© Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767
2026-05-21
2026-06-10
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/31/20/eurosurv-31-20-4.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dekker M, Laverman GD, de Vries A, Reimerink J, Geeraedts F. Emergence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in the Netherlands. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019;10(1):176-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.10.008  PMID: 30385073 
  2. Bogovic P, Strle F. Tick-borne encephalitis: A review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(5):430-41.  https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.430  PMID: 25984517 
  3. Bartholdsson S, Hergens M-P, Hansson KE, Ragnarsson J, Hodosi P, Kus I, et al. Clinical characteristics of tick-borne encephalitis in adult patients: a 10-year retrospective study in Stockholm, Sweden. J Infect Dis. 2025;231(1):e195-205.  https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae463  PMID: 39316686 
  4. de Graaf JA, Reimerink JH, Voorn GP, Bij de Vaate EA, de Vries A, Rockx B, et al. First human case of tick-borne encephalitis virus infection acquired in the Netherlands, July 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(33):30318.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.33.30318  PMID: 27562931 
  5. Weststrate AC, Knapen D, Laverman GD, Schot B, Prick JJ, Spit SA, et al. Increasing evidence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus transmission, the Netherlands, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(11):30482.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.11.30482  PMID: 28333618 
  6. Jahfari S, de Vries A, Rijks JM, Van Gucht S, Vennema H, Sprong H, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in ticks and roe deer, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(6):1028-30.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2306.161247  PMID: 28518024 
  7. Esser HJ, Lim SM, de Vries A, Sprong H, Dekker DJ, Pascoe EL, et al. Continued circulation of tick-borne encephalitis virus variants and detection of novel transmission foci, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(12):2416-24.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2812.220552  PMID: 36288572 
  8. Pascoe EL, Bakker JW, Wijburg SR, de Vries A, Sprong H, Marcantonio M, et al. Multiple variants of tick-borne encephalitis virus in voles, mice and ticks, the Netherlands, 2021 to 2023. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(4):2400247.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.4.2400247  PMID: 39885821 
  9. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Tekenencefalitis |LCI-richtlijn. [Tick-borne encephalitis – recommendations]. Bilthoven: RIVM; 14 Jan 2025. Dutch. Available from: https://lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen/tekenencefalitis
  10. Rijks JM, Montizaan MGE, Bakker N, de Vries A, Van Gucht S, Swaan C, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies in roe deer, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(2):342-5.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2502.181386  PMID: 30666954 
  11. Dobler G, Hufert F, Pfeffer M, Essbauer S. Tick-borne encephalitis: From microfocus to human disease. In: Mehlhorn H (editor). Progress in parasitology. Dordrecht: Springer; 29 Jul 2011.p. 323-31. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-21396-0_17
  12. Estrada-Peña A, de la Fuente J. The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases. Antiviral Res. 2014;108:104-28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.05.016  PMID: 24925264 
  13. Randolph SE, Miklisová D, Lysy J, Rogers DJ, Labuda M. Incidence from coincidence: patterns of tick infestations on rodents facilitate transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Parasitology. 1999;118(Pt 2):177-86.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182098003643  PMID: 10028532 
  14. Borde JP, Kaier K, Hehn P, Matzarakis A, Frey S, Bestehorn M, et al. The complex interplay of climate, TBEV vector dynamics and TBEV infection rates in ticks–monitoring a natural TBEV focus in Germany, 2009-2018. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244668.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244668  PMID: 33411799 
  15. Valarcher JF, Hägglund S, Juremalm M, Blomqvist G, Renström L, Zohari S, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34(2):453-66.  https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.34.2.2371  PMID: 26601448 
  16. Jaenson TGT, Petersson EH, Jaenson DGE, Kindberg J, Pettersson JH-O, Hjertqvist M, et al. The importance of wildlife in the ecology and epidemiology of the TBE virus in Sweden: incidence of human TBE correlates with abundance of deer and hares. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):477.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3057-4  PMID: 30153856 
  17. Cagnacci F, Bolzoni L, Rosà R, Carpi G, Hauffe HC, Valent M, et al. Effects of deer density on tick infestation of rodents and the hazard of tick-borne encephalitis. I: empirical assessment. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42(4):365-72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.02.012  PMID: 22464896 
  18. Gerth H-J, Grimshandl D, Stage B, Döller G, Kunz C. Roe deer as sentinels for endemicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;115(2):355-65.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800058477  PMID: 7589274 
  19. Morellet N, Bonenfant C, Börger L, Ossi F, Cagnacci F, Heurich M, et al. Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe. J Anim Ecol. 2013;82(6):1326-39.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12105  PMID: 23855883 
  20. Waldenström J, Lundkvist A, Falk KI, Garpmo U, Bergström S, Lindegren G, et al. Migrating birds and tickborne encephalitis virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(8):1215-8.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1308.061416  PMID: 17953095 
  21. Kelly PH, Kwark R, Marick HM, Davis J, Stark JH, Madhava H, et al. Different environmental factors predict the occurrence of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and reveal new potential risk areas across Europe via geospatial models. Int J Health Geogr. 2025;24(1):3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-025-00388-9  PMID: 40087786 
  22. Uusitalo R, Siljander M, Dub T, Sane J, Sormunen JJ, Pellikka P, et al. Modelling habitat suitability for occurrence of human tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) cases in Finland. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11(5):101457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101457  PMID: 32723626 
  23. Hartemink NA, Randolph SE, Davis SA, Heesterbeek JA. The basic reproduction number for complex disease systems: defining R(0) for tick-borne infections. Am Nat. 2008;171(6):743-54.  https://doi.org/10.1086/587530  PMID: 18462128 
  24. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP. Mathematical epidemiology of infectious diseases: model building, analysis and interpretation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  25. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP, Metz JAJ. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol. 1990;28(4):365-82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178324  PMID: 2117040 
  26. Benkimoun S, Atyame C, Haramboure M, Degenne P, Thébault H, Dehecq J-S, et al. Dynamic mapping of dengue basic reproduction number. Results Phys. 2021;29:104687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104687 
  27. Hartemink NA, Purse BV, Meiswinkel R, Brown HE, de Koeijer A, Elbers AR, et al. Mapping the basic reproduction number (R0) for vector-borne diseases: a case study on bluetongue virus. Epidemics. 2009;1(3):153-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2009.05.004  PMID: 21352762 
  28. Hartemink N. Modelling and mapping the basic reproduction number R0 for canine leishmaniasis: a case study for a region in South West France. In: Hartemink N (PhD dissertation). Vector-borne diseases: the basic reproduction number R0 and risk maps. Utrecht: Utrecht university; 7 Dec 2009. Available from: https://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/vector-borne-diseases-the-basic-reproduction-number-r0-and-risk-m/
  29. Esser HJ, Liefting Y, Ibáñez-Justicia A, van der Jeugd H, van Turnhout CAM, Stroo A, et al. Spatial risk analysis for the introduction and circulation of six arboviruses in the Netherlands. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):464.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04339-0  PMID: 32912330 
  30. Fabri ND, Heesterbeek H, Cromsigt JPGM, Ecke F, Sprong H, Nijhuis L, et al. Exploring the influence of host community composition on the outbreak potential of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2024;15(1):102275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102275  PMID: 37922668 
  31. Matser A, Hartemink N, Heesterbeek H, Galvani A, Davis S. Elasticity analysis in epidemiology: an application to tick-borne infections. Ecol Lett. 2009;12(12):1298-305.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01378.x  PMID: 19740112 
  32. Danielová V, Holubová J, Pejcoch M, Daniel M. Potential significance of transovarial transmission in the circulation of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2002;49(4):323-5.  https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2002.060  PMID: 12641208 
  33. Militzer N, Bartel A, Clausen P-H, Hoffmann-Köhler P, Nijhof AM. Artificial feeding of all consecutive life stages of Ixodes ricinus. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(4):385.  https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040385  PMID: 33919961 
  34. Streng K, Hakze-van der Honing RW, Graham H, van Oort S, de Best PA, Abourashed A, et al. Orthoflavivirus surveillance in the Netherlands: Insights from a serosurvey in horses & dogs and a questionnaire among horse owners. Zoonoses Public Health. 2024;71(8):900-10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.13171  PMID: 39057842 
  35. Schwaiger M, Cassinotti P. Development of a quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay with internal control for the laboratory detection of tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) RNA. J Clin Virol. 2003;27(2):136-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-6532(02)00168-3  PMID: 12829035 
  36. Hassall RM, Holding M, Medlock JM, Asaaga FA, Vanwambeke SO, Hewson R, et al. Identifying hotspots and risk factors for tick-borne encephalitis virus emergence at its range margins to guide interventions, Great Britain. Euro Surveill. 2025;30(13):2400441.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.13.2400441  PMID: 40183125 
  37. de Jongh L, de Jong R, Schenau S, van Berkel J, Bogaart P, Driessen C, et al. Natuurlijk Kapitaalrekeningen Nederland 2013-2018. [Natural Capital Accounts the Netherlands 2013-2018]. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands; 30 Jul 2021. Dutch. Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/aanvullende-statistische-diensten/2021/natuurlijk-kapitaalrekeningen-nederland-2013-2018
  38. Ollivier V, Choquet R, Gamble A, Bastien M, Combes B, Gilot-Fromont E, et al. Temporal dynamics of antibody level against Lyme disease bacteria in roe deer: Tale of a sentinel? Ecol Evol. 2023;13(8):e10414.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10414  PMID: 37600488 
  39. Rosà R, Tagliapietra V, Manica M, Arnoldi D, Hauffe HC, Rossi C, et al. Changes in host densities and co-feeding pattern efficiently predict tick-borne encephalitis hazard in an endemic focus in northern Italy. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49(10):779-87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.05.006  PMID: 31348960 
  40. Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Toename meeste zoogdieren sinds 1995, afname onder beschermde soorten na 2011. [Number of mammals increased since 1995, protected species decreased after 2011]. The Hague: CBS; 30 Oct 2023. Dutch. Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2023/44/toename-meeste-zoogdieren-sinds-1995-afname-onder-beschermde-soorten-na-2011
  41. Koninklijke Nederlandse Jagersvereniging (KNJV). Reeën. [Roe deer]. Amersfoort: KNJV. [Accessed: 18 May 2026]. Dutch. Available from: https://www.jagersvereniging.nl/onderwerp/standpunt-reeen
  42. van den Bremer L, van Turnhout C. Voorstudie Jaar van de Merel 2022. Sovon-rapport 2021/56. [Preliminary study year of the Blackbird 2022]. Nijmegen: Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland; 2021. Dutch. Available from: https://stats.sovon.nl/static/publicaties/rap_2021-56_jaar-vd-merel-2021.pdf
  43. van Beusekom R. Vogelbalans 2021: hoe vergaat het onze vogels? [Bird counting: how are our birds doing?]. Zeist: Vogelbescherming; 10 Jan 2022. Dutch. Available from: https://www.vogelbescherming.nl/actueel/bericht/vogelbalans-2021-hoe-vergaat-het-onze-vogels
  44. Rizzoli A, Hauffe HC, Tagliapietra V, Neteler M, Rosà R. Forest structure and roe deer abundance predict tick-borne encephalitis risk in Italy. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4336.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004336  PMID: 19183811 
  45. Dagostin F, Tagliapietra V, Marini G, Ferrari G, Cervellini M, Wint W, et al. High habitat richness reduces the risk of tick-borne encephalitis in Europe: A multi-scale study. One Health. 2023;18:100669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100669  PMID: 38283833 
  46. Randolph S, Chemini C, Furlanello C, Genchi C, Hails R. The ecology of tick-borne diseases in wildlife reservoirs. In: Hudson P, Rizzoli A, Grenfell B, Heesterbeek H, Dobson A (editors). The Ecology of Wildlife Diseases. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 3 Jan 2002. p. 119-38.
  47. Jaenson TG, Hjertqvist M, Bergström T, Lundkvist A. Why is tick-borne encephalitis increasing? A review of the key factors causing the increasing incidence of human TBE in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5(1):184.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-184  PMID: 22937961 
  48. Farr MT, Green DS, Holekamp KE, Zipkin EF. Integrating distance sampling and presence-only data to estimate species abundance. Ecology. 2021;102(1):e03204.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3204  PMID: 32970847 
  49. Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill NA, Thomson RJ, Edgar GJ, et al. Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biol Conserv. 2014;173:144-54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037 
  50. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2010;41(1):149-72.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636 
  51. Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl. 2009;19(1):181-97.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1  PMID: 19323182 
  52. Zoogdiervereniging. Bosmuis. [Wood mouse]. Nijmegen: Zoogdiervereniging. [Accessed: 18 May 2026]. Dutch. Available from: https://www.zoogdiervereniging.nl/zoogdiersoorten/bosmuis
  53. Forsyth DM, Comte S, Davis NE, Bengsen AJ, Côté SD, Hewitt DG, et al. Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements. J Wildl Manage. 2022;86(4):e22207.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22207 
  54. Royle JA, Nichols JD. Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts. Ecology. 2003;84(3):777-90.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:EAFRPA]2.0.CO;2 
  55. Informatiepunt Leefomgeving (IPLO). Faunabeheerplan en faunabeheereenheid. [Wildlife management plan and management unit]. Hague: IPLO. [Accessed: 18 May 2026]. Dutch. Available from: https://iplo.nl/thema/natuur/faunabeheerplan-faunabeheereenheid
Targeted monitoring informed by mapping the ongoing spread of tick-borne encephalitis virus, the Netherlands
<p class="citation"> <span>Citation style for this article:</span> <span class="meta-value authors"> <a href="/search?value1=Sara+R+Wijburg&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Wijburg Sara R</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Dedeke+Rockx-Brouwer&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Rockx-Brouwer Dedeke</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Megan+K+Herbert&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Herbert Megan K</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Jolianne+M+Rijks&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Rijks Jolianne M</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Paulina+M+Lesiczka&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Lesiczka Paulina M</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Miriam+Maas&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Maas Miriam</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Andrea+Gr%C3%B6ne&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Gröne Andrea</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Renate+W+Hakze-van+der+Honing&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Hakze-van der Honing Renate W</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Maya+Holding&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Holding Maya</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Helen+J+Esser&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Esser Helen J</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Hein+Sprong&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Sprong Hein</a>, <a href="/search?value1=Egil+AJ+Fischer&option1=author&noRedirect=true" class="nonDisambigAuthorLink">Fischer Egil AJ</a></span>. Targeted monitoring informed by mapping the ongoing spread of tick-borne encephalitis virus, the Netherlands. <a href="/content/ecdc">Euro Surveill.</a> 2026;31(20):pii=2500767. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767" title="doi link" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767</a> <span class="ES_Article_citation"> <span class="generated">Received</span>: 02 Oct 2025;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="generated">Accepted</span>: 16 Jan 2026 </span> </p>
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.20.2500767
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error