1887
Research Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technologies available for applied public health practice are rapidly evolving. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become more accessible, however, their utilisation by field epidemiologists has not been described.

AIM

We explored AI use among Canadian, European, and United States (US) Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) fellows.

METHODS

Fellows in the three programmes (n = 220) were invited to an online survey available from 25 November 2024 to 5 December 2024. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concerning the AI platforms fellows used, AI applications, comfort level when applying AI, use frequency, impact on work, barriers, ethical concerns, AI policy/guideline availability, and AI training.

RESULTS

There were 105 (48%) survey respondents: 13, 56 and 36 in the Canadian, US and European FETPs respectively. The proportion of respondents who reported applying AI for work was 66% (69/105) overall, and highest among respondents of the European programme (32/36). The most adopted platform was ChatGPT (60/69; 87%), and the most common application was analytical coding assistance (63/69; 91%). Among AI users, most felt somewhat comfortable (34/69; 49%) or comfortable (24/69; 35%) with AI and reported weekly (29/69; 42%) or daily (21/69; 30%) use. Generally, AI’s reported impact was positive. Challenges included technical difficulties, accuracy concerns, bias introduction, uncertainty regarding permissible uses, and data privacy issues. Among respondents, 47% (49/105) affirmed having AI policies/guidelines in their institutions and 20% (21/105) had received AI training.

CONCLUSION

To further incorporate AI use among its fellows, FETPs should monitor AI’s evolving role, and provide guidance and adapt curricula accordingly.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.26.2500677
2026-07-02
2026-07-18
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.26.2500677
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/31/26/eurosurv-31-26-2.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.26.2500677&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ma L, Sun B. Machine learning and AI in marketing–Connecting computing power to human insights. Int J Res Mark. 2020;37(3):481-504.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.04.005 
  2. AI for Public Health. Laying the groundwork for artificial intelligence to advance public health in Canada. Ottawa: Canada; 2024.
  3. Brownstein JS, Rader B, Astley CM, Tian H. Advances in artificial intelligence for infectious-disease surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(17):1597-607.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2119215  PMID: 37099342 
  4. MacIntyre CR, Lim S, Quigley A. Preventing the next pandemic: Use of artificial intelligence for epidemic monitoring and alerts. Cell Rep Med. 2022;3(12):100867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100867  PMID: 36543103 
  5. Jiao Z, Ji H, Yan J, Qi X. Application of big data and artificial intelligence in epidemic surveillance and containment. Intell Med. 2023;3(1):36-43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imed.2022.10.003  PMID: 36373090 
  6. Yoga Ratnam KK. Generative artificial intelligence in public health research and scientific communication: A narrative review of real applications and future directions. Digit Health. 2025;11:20552076251362070.  https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251362070  PMID: 40842935 
  7. Sanmarchi F, Bucci A, Nuzzolese AG, Carullo G, Toscano F, Nante N, et al. A step-by-step researcher’s guide to the use of an AI-based transformer in epidemiology: an exploratory analysis of ChatGPT using the STROBE checklist for observational studies. J Public Health (Berl). 2024;32(9):1761-96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01936-y 
  8. Becerra JE. The future of field epidemiological research: Harnessing the power of AI. Am J Field Epidemiol. 2023;1(3):40-1.  https://doi.org/10.59273/ajfe.v1i3.8181 
  9. Flores L, Kim S, Young SD. Addressing bias in artificial intelligence for public health surveillance. J Med Ethics. 2024;50(3):190-4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108875  PMID: 37130756 
  10. Salerno J, Coughlin SS, Goodman KW, Hlaing WM. Current ethical and social issues in epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 2023;80:37-42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.02.001  PMID: 36758845 
  11. Rothenberg R, Maldonado G. Can ChatBots do Epi? Glob Epidemiol. 2023;5:100106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100106  PMID: 37638376 
  12. Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (TEPHINET). What is a field epidemiology training program? [Accessed 22 Jan 2026]. Available from: https://www.tephinet.org/our-network-fetps/about-fetp
  13. Government of Canada. Canadian Field Epidemiology Program. [Accessed 20 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/public-health-practice/canadian-field-epidemiology-program.html
  14. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC). About the Epidemic Intelligence Service. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed 20 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/eis/php/about/index.html.
  15. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Fellowship programme: EPIET/EUPHEM. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed 20 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/epiet-euphem.
  16. Ghimire A, Edwards J. Coding with AI: How are tools like ChatGPT being used by students in foundational programming courses. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education; 2024; Recife, Brazil.
  17. Becker B, Luxton-Reilly A, Denny P, James P, Finnie-Ansley J, Santos EA. Programming Is hard – or at least it used to be: Educational opportunities and challenges of AI code generation. In The Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education; 2024; Toronto, Canada:
  18. Sergeyuk A, Golubev Y, Bryksin T, Ahmed I. Using AI-based coding assistants in practice: State of affairs, perceptions, and ways forward. Inf Softw Technol. 2025;178:107610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107610 
  19. AI4PH. AI4PH Short Courses. [Accessed 10 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://ai4ph-hrtp.ca/short-courses/
  20. Coursera. AI and Public Health. [Accessed 10 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.coursera.org/learn/ai-and-public-health
  21. Government of Canada. Guide on the use of generative artificial intelligence. [Accessed 9 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai/guide-use-generative-ai.html
  22. Government of Canada. Responsible use of artificial intelligence in government. [Accessed 9 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai.html
  23. Government of Canada. AI strategy for the federal public service 2025-2027. [Accessed 25 Mar 2025]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai/gc-ai-strategy-overview.html
  24. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Artificial Intelligence Act. [Accessed 25 Mar 2025]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy 2021. [Accessed 17 Jun 2025]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/final-hhs-ai-strategy.pdf
  26. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Contro (ECDC). Annex 17. Do’s and Don’ts – Artificial Intelligence in the ECDC Fellowship Training Programme. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed 4 Feb 2026]. Available from https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Annex-17-AI-working-document-dos-and-donts.pdf
  27. Wang Q, Li Y, Li R. Ecological footprints, carbon emissions, and energy transitions: the impact of artificial intelligence (AI). Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11(1):1043.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03520-5 
  28. Zhao C, Dong K, Wang K, Nepal R. How does artificial intelligence promote renewable energy development? The role of climate finance. Energy Econ. 2024;133:107493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107493 
  29. Berthelot A, Caron E, Jay M, Lefèvre L. Estimating the environmental impact of Generative-AI services using an LCA-based methodology. In 31st CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering; 2024; Turin, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.01.098 
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.26.2500677
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error