1887
Surveillance Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public Health Intelligence (PHI) aims to detect health threats early for a timely and effective response. The PHI team at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) uses the Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) system in combination with other sources for detecting signals of international public health threats relevant to Germany. However, while EIOS is increasingly used for PHI worldwide, it is rarely evaluated.

AIM

We designed and conducted an attribute-based evaluation to assess EIOS’s performance for international PHI in 2023 and to identify areas for improvement.

METHODS

We adapted surveillance system attributes and designed attribute-specific data collection methods. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation combining prospective and retrospective operational data collection with feedback from PHI officers.

RESULTS

During 2 weeks in July 2023, the PHI team reported 20 signals: 16 detected using EIOS and four from other sources. Increasing the number of EIOS sources increased timeliness and sensitivity slightly but caused a 35-fold increase in articles to screen (35,546 vs 1,138). The team found EIOS flexible and simple for signal detection but identified challenges in simplicity of signal documenting and reporting and in completeness of EIOS sources screened by the team.

CONCLUSION

The current use of EIOS proved sensitive and timely. However, PHI must balance sensitivity, timeliness and resource requirements. To maintain this balance, we strongly recommend regular evaluations of the use of EIOS for PHI. Our evaluation offers practical guidance for other PHI teams. We recommend integrating EIOS with an event management system to facilitate signal documentation and reporting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.5.2500363
2026-02-05
2026-02-08
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.5.2500363
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/31/5/eurosurv-31-5-2.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.5.2500363&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hamblion E, Saad NJ, Greene-Cramer B, Awofisayo-Okuyelu A, Selenic Minet D, Smirnova A, et al. Global public health intelligence: World Health Organization operational practices. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(9):e0002359.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002359  PMID: 37729134 
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Public Health Intelligence in Practice: A Global Perspective. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/eios/global-technical-meeting-2019/presentations/public-health-intelligence-in-practice
  3. Robert Koch Institute (RKI). ZIG 1: Information Centre for International Health Protection (INIG). Berlin: RKI. [Accessed: 29 Jul 2025]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/EN/Institute/Organisation/Departments/ZIG/ZIG1/INIG_org.html
  4. Paquet C, Coulombier D, Kaiser R, Ciotti M. Epidemic intelligence: a new framework for strengthening disease surveillance in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(12):212-4.  https://doi.org/10.2807/esm.11.12.00665-en  PMID: 17370970 
  5. Abdelmalik P, Peron É, Schnitzler J, Fontaine J, Elfenkämper E, Barboza P. The Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources initiative: a collaboration to harmonize and standardize early detection and epidemic intelligence among public health organizations. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2018;2018(20):18.
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS). Genava: WHO. [Accessed: 8 Aug 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/eios
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Data quality monitoring and surveillance system evaluation - A handbook of methods and applications. Stockholm: ECDC, 2014. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/data-quality-monitoring-and-surveillance-system-evaluation-handbook-methods-and
  8. German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, Milstein RL, Pertowski CA, Waller MN, Guidelines Working Group Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-13):1-35, quiz CE1-7. PMID: 18634202 
  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Early Warning and Response System of the European Union (EWRS). Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 4 Sep 2025]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/early-warning-and-response-system-european-union-ewrs
  10. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Weekly threats reports (CDTR) 2022. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 4 Oct 2024]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-and-data/monitoring/weekly-threats-reports
  11. Mackenzie JS, Drury P, Arthur RR, Ryan MJ, Grein T, Slattery R, et al. The global outbreak alert and response network. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):1023-39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.951870  PMID: 25186571 
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). International Health Regulations (2005). 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO; 1 Jan 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496
  13. Milde-Busch A, Zeitlmann N, Mücke I, Gilsdorf A, Rexroth U, An der Heiden M, EpiLag-Working Group. Ten years of weekly epidemiological teleconference (EpiLag) - an effective and time-efficient tool for infectious disease event information, Germany, 2009-2018. Epidemiol Infect. 2021;149:e115.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026882100073X  PMID: 33843539 
  14. Groseclose SL, Buckeridge DL. Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recent Advances in Their Use and Evaluation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38(1):57-79.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044348  PMID: 27992726 
  15. Zaghloul A, Balajee A, Varma J, Idowu R, Merali S. Africa CDC event-based surveillance framework. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Stacks; 2018. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/95823
  16. World Health Organization (WHO). Early detection, assessment and response to acute public health events: implementation of early warning and response with a focus on event-based surveillance. Geneva: WHO: 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HSE-GCR-LYO-2014.4
  17. World Health Organization (WHO). Overview of the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating surveillance and response systems for communicable diseases. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2004;79(36):322-6. Geneva: WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer7936
  18. Calba C, Goutard FL, Hoinville L, Hendrikx P, Lindberg A, Saegerman C, et al. Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):448.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1791-5  PMID: 25928645 
  19. McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655-62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x  PMID: 26846316 
  20. Choi BCK, Barengo NC, Diaz PA. Public health surveillance and the data, information, knowledge, intelligence and wisdom paradigm. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024;48:e9.  https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.9  PMID: 38464871 
  21. Barboza P, Vaillant L, Mawudeku A, Nelson NP, Hartley DM, Madoff LC, et al. Evaluation of epidemic intelligence systems integrated in the early alerting and reporting project for the detection of A/H5N1 influenza events. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57252.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057252  PMID: 23472077 
  22. Saad Duque NJ, Greene-Cramer B, Awofisayo-Okuyelu A, Selenic Minet D, Almiron M, Swanson K, et al. Embedding public health intelligence into the global public health architecture. BMJ Public Health. 2024;2(2):e001011.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001011  PMID: 41190234 
  23. Mercy K, Salyer SJ, Mankga C, Hedberg C, Zondo P, Kebede Y. Establishing an early warning event management system at Africa CDC. PLOS Digit Health. 2024;3(7):e0000546.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000546  PMID: 38976663 
  24. Williams GS, Impouma B, Mboussou F, Lee TM, Ogundiran O, Okot C, et al. Implementing epidemic intelligence in the WHO African region for early detection and response to acute public health events. Epidemiol Infect. 2021;149:e261.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026882100114X  PMID: 33985609 
  25. World Health Organization (WHO). EIOS Community of practice. Geneva: WHO. [Accessed 23 Jan 2026]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/eios/eios-community-of-practice
  26. Togami E, Griffith B, Mahran M, Nezu IH, Mirembe BB, Kaasik-Aaslav K, et al. The World Health Organization’s public health intelligence activities during the COVID-19 pandemic response, December 2019 to December 2021. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(49):2200142.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.49.2200142  PMID: 36695442 
  27. Yanagawa M, Lorenzo JC, Fukusumi M, Shimada T, Kasamatsu A, Ota M, et al. Use of Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources for global event-based surveillance of infectious diseases for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2019;13(3):1-7. PMID: 36688182 
  28. Sallam M, Jabbar R, Mahadoon LK, Elshareif TJ, Darweesh M, Ahmed HS, et al. Enhanced event-based surveillance: Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) during FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar. J Infect Public Health. 2024;17(9):102514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102514  PMID: 39142081 
  29. Fanelli A, Schnitzler JC, De Nardi M, Donachie A, Capua I, Lanave G, et al. Epidemic intelligence data of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, European Region, 2012 to 2022: a new opportunity for risk mapping of neglected diseases. Euro Surveill. 2023;28(16):2200542.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.16.2200542  PMID: 37078883 
  30. Ganser I, Thiébaut R, Buckeridge DL. Global Variations in Event-Based Surveillance for Disease Outbreak Detection: Time Series Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(10):e36211.  https://doi.org/10.2196/36211  PMID: 36315218 
  31. Williams GS, Koua EL, Abdelmalik P, Kambale F, Kibangou E, Nguna J, et al. Evaluation of the epidemic intelligence from open sources (EIOS) system for the early detection of outbreaks and health emergencies in the African region. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):857.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21998-9  PMID: 40038598 
  32. Fanelli A, Awada L, Caceres-Soto P, Diaz F, Grillo T, Gizo I, et al. Sensitivity of an international notification system for wildlife diseases: A case study using the OIE-WAHIS data on tularemia. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69(4):286-94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12916  PMID: 35092712 
  33. Balajee SA, Salyer SJ, Greene-Cramer B, Sadek M, Mounts AW. The practice of event-based surveillance: concept and methods. Glob Secur (Abingdon). 2021;6(1):1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2020.1848444 
  34. Crawley AW, Mercy K, Shivji S, Lofgren H, Trowbridge D, Manthey C, et al. An indicator framework for the monitoring and evaluation of event-based surveillance systems. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(4):e707-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00034-2  PMID: 38364834 
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.5.2500363
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data

Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error