- Home
- Eurosurveillance
- Previous Issues
- Volume 31, Issue 22, 04/Jun/2026
Eurosurveillance - Volume 31, Issue 22, 04 June 2026
Volume 31, Issue 22, 2026
- Rapid communication
-
-
-
Why Andes hantavirus is not the next SARS-CoV-2: contrasting viral shedding, transmissibility and genomic patterns
More LessA cruise ship-associated Andes hantavirus outbreak has raised questions usually associated with respiratory viruses, including transmissibility and pandemic risk. Although Andes virus may enter through the respiratory route, cause severe respiratory disease and under close contact spread between humans, it differs fundamentally from SARS-CoV-2. The ecology is rodent-borne, pathogenesis is vascular, diagnosis is centred on blood PCR and serology, and genetic diversity is mainly shaped by reservoir ecology and geography rather than by sustained human-to-human transmission and immune selection.
-
-
-
Scenario analysis for potential community spread of Andes virus (ANDV)
Valentina Marziano , Alfredo De Bellis , Martina Del Manso , Antonino Bella , Alberto Mateo Urdiales , Carla Molina Grané , Francesco Menegale , Lorenzo Lucchini , Mattia Manica , Sobha Pilati , Daniele Mipatrini , Flavia Riccardo , Giorgio Guzzetta , Piero Poletti , Anna Teresa Palamara , Patrizio Pezzotti and Stefano MerlerMore LessWe simulated the potential community spread of Andes virus (ANDV) following the introduction of a single infectious individual in a generic population, based on epidemiological parameters derived from a human-to-human historical outbreak. Under current available evidence, our analyses suggest that, within 4 months from the index case’s symptom onset, the expected outbreak size is unlikely to exceed 50 cases, with a high probability of epidemic extinction, particularly when > 50% cases are effectively isolated from the start of the outbreak.
-
- Top
-
- Research
-
-
-
Modelling the risk of West Nile virus infection in seven European countries from published serological and case notification data, 2008 to 2022
More LessBACKGROUNDWest Nile virus (WNV) is a zoonotic mosquito-borne pathogen increasingly reported in Europe.
AIMWe aimed to characterise heterogeneities in the average annual human risk of WNV infection (force of infection, FOI) and in WNV surveillance across Europe.
METHODSWe conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines to identify serological studies on WNV in humans with IgG-based assays in Europe. We then used mathematical models fitted to both age-stratified serosurvey and case data to reconstruct spatially explicit FOI estimates, the sensitivity of syndromic surveillance and age-dependent trends in case reporting.
RESULTSWe extracted 92 serosurvey datasets from 21 countries. Based on 10 age-stratified serosurvey datasets from Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania and Spain and case data from seven countries (Austria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania and Spain), we estimated the WNV FOI for 119 European nomenclature of territorial units for statistics level (NUTS) 0-3 regions. We found evidence of spatial heterogeneities in transmission intensity and estimated that on average less than 0.2% of human WNV infections were notified, with country variability and age-dependent trends in the propensity of reporting WNV disease.
CONCLUSIONThis study shows that the intensity of WNV transmission, the average annual incidence of infection and the sensitivity of surveillance are heterogeneous across Europe. Due to differences in case reporting across countries, the incidence of reported WNV cases does not necessarily reflect the same proportion of WNV infections and hence the actual infection incidence, which highlights the importance of conducting WNV seroprevalence surveys.
-
-
-
Informing quarantine policy for measles control in primary school and daycare settings: insights from a simulation study, Flanders, Belgium
More LessBACKGROUNDWith a notification rate of 44.9 per million population in 2024, Belgium was among the countries with the highest measles rate of the European Union/European Economic Area countries. Although the coverage of the first dose of measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccination in Flanders was 96% in 2020, two-dose coverage was below 95%. To minimise the risk of sustained measles transmission in vulnerable settings, such as primary schools with low vaccination coverage or daycares, it is important to quarantine susceptible contacts of a measles case.
AIMWe aimed to identify policies that balance measles outbreak control with societal as well as educational impact of quarantining children.
METHODSUsing a simulation model, we evaluated the impact of different quarantine strategies for measles in primary school and daycare settings in Flanders, Belgium.
RESULTSWe found that shortening the quarantine period from 21 to 18 days only moderately (e.g. 16–37% in primary school) increased the risk of a subsequent infection wave, and the final proportion of later-generation cases remained at most 3.2% of the school or daycare. In settings with a low vaccination coverage (e.g. 20%), multiple independent introductions or a low diagnosis rate (e.g. only half of symptomatic children going to a doctor), the addition of post-exposure vaccination can further reduce transmission risk.
CONCLUSIONWe found that quarantine duration could be shorter than the presumed maximal incubation period of 21 days, without substantially increasing the risk of onward transmission. As such, acceptability and compliance with mandated quarantine periods might also increase.
-
-
-
Evaluating a new partner management strategy for bacterial sexually transmitted infections after a change in 2020 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017 to 2023
More LessBACKGROUNDFrom 1 March 2020, the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam limits presumptive treatment for chlamydia or gonorrhoea to clients notified by steady partners. Treatment after notification by non-steady partners requires a positive test result.
AIMWe aimed to evaluate this change in policy on unnecessary antibiotic treatment, time to treatment and lost to follow-up clients.
METHODSWe included consultations (with testing) following partner notification for chlamydia or gonorrhoea between 1 March 2017 and 1 March 2023. Primary outcome was unnecessary antibiotic treatment (presumptive treatment with negative test result) before vs after the policy change. We also assessed return for treatment of confirmed and not presumptively treated individuals after the policy change.
RESULTSFrom 4,579 consultations, unnecessary antibiotics were prescribed for 786/1,318 (59.6%) clients for chlamydia and 729/1,117 (65.3%) clients for gonorrhoea before 1 March 2020. After 1 March 2020, this decreased to 324/1,275 (25%) and 341/1,369 (25%), respectively, corresponding to a relative reduction of 58% for chlamydia (adjusted relative risk (aRR): 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37–0.47) and 63% (aRR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.33–0.42) for gonorrhoea. After the policy change, clients not given presumptive treatment but later diagnosed returned after a median of 7 days (interquartile range (IQR): 5–8) for chlamydia and 6 days (IQR: 4–7) for gonorrhoea. Missed treatment occurred in 4/155 (2.6%) of chlamydia and 5/158 (3.2%) of gonorrhoea consultations.
CONCLUSIONThe new partner management protocol substantially reduced unnecessary antibiotic treatment for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. The majority of confirmed infections still received appropriate treatment.
-
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 31 (2026)
-
Volume 30 (2025)
-
Volume 29 (2024)
-
Volume 28 (2023)
-
Volume 27 (2022)
-
Volume 26 (2021)
-
Volume 25 (2020)
-
Volume 24 (2019)
-
Volume 23 (2018)
-
Volume 22 (2017)
-
Volume 21 (2016)
-
Volume 20 (2015)
-
Volume 19 (2014)
-
Volume 18 (2013)
-
Volume 17 (2012)
-
Volume 16 (2011)
-
Volume 15 (2010)
-
Volume 14 (2009)
-
Volume 13 (2008)
-
Volume 12 (2007)
-
Volume 11 (2006)
-
Volume 10 (2005)
-
Volume 9 (2004)
-
Volume 8 (2003)
-
Volume 7 (2002)
-
Volume 6 (2001)
-
Volume 5 (2000)
-
Volume 4 (1999)
-
Volume 3 (1998)
-
Volume 2 (1997)
-
Volume 1 (1996)
-
Volume 0 (1995)
Most Read This Month
-
-
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR
Victor M Corman , Olfert Landt , Marco Kaiser , Richard Molenkamp , Adam Meijer , Daniel KW Chu , Tobias Bleicker , Sebastian Brünink , Julia Schneider , Marie Luisa Schmidt , Daphne GJC Mulders , Bart L Haagmans , Bas van der Veer , Sharon van den Brink , Lisa Wijsman , Gabriel Goderski , Jean-Louis Romette , Joanna Ellis , Maria Zambon , Malik Peiris , Herman Goossens , Chantal Reusken , Marion PG Koopmans and Christian Drosten
-
- More Less
