Eurosurveillance banner




Announcements
Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Weekly Release  2006: Volume 11/ Issue 31 Article 4 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 11, Issue 31, 03 August 2006
Articles

Citation style for this article: Boncompagni G, Incandela L, Bechini A, Giannini D, Cellini C, Trezzi M, Ciofi Degli Atti ML, Ansaldi F, Valle L, Bonanni P. Measles outbreak in Grosseto, central Italy, 2006. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(31):pii=3015. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=3015

Measles outbreak in Grosseto, central Italy, 2006

G Boncompagni1, L Incandela1, A Bechini2, D Giannini1, C Cellini3, M Trezzi3, ML Ciofi degli Atti4 (ciofi@iss.it), F Ansaldi5, L Valle5, P Bonanni2

1Local Health Agency 9 - Hygiene and Public Health (zone 4) – Grosseto, Italy
2Department of Public Health – University of Florence, Italy
3Unit of Infectious Diseases - Grosseto Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
4Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
5Department of Health Sciences - University of Genoa, Italy

Introduction
From 2003 to 2007, Italy is implementing a national plan to eliminate measles and congenital rubella [1]. In addition to efforts to reach 95% coverage with the first MMR dose by the age of 24 months, ongoing activities include increasing coverage with the second dose at 5-6 years of age, and catch-up of 6-13 year old children in primary and lower secondary schools. In Toscana (often known in English as Tuscany - a region of central Italy with approximately 3.5 million inhabitants), coverage with the first measles-containing-vaccine dose by 24 months of age was 44% in 1993, 65% in 1998, and 89% in 2003 [2], according to three cluster sampling surveys. In 6-10 year old children attending primary school, MCV coverage was estimated to be 88% for the first dose, and 66% for the second dose by December 2004. Although the elimination plan has so far been very successful in achieving its goals, a continually insufficient coverage rate for measles vaccine during the past 15 years has created a large pool of susceptible adolescents and young adults.

Description of the outbreak
Between 20 January and 5 May 2006, 40 cases of measles were reported to the local health unit in the province of Grosseto in Toscana. The population of the province, which includes the town of Grosseto and the surrounding area, is approximately 200 000. Twenty three of the cases (58%) were in males and 17 (42%) in females. Seventy five percent of the cases occurred between mid-February and the end of March 2006, with a peak in March (Figure 1). Ninety five per cent of the patients were over 15 years old (Figure 2), and the mean age was 27 years.

The index case was a 23 year old woman who showed symptoms suggestive of measles after returning from a visit to India. She initially presented with fever, and was treated with antibiotics. She then developed a generalised rash, which was diagnosed as a drug reaction, and she was admitted to hospital in Grosseto on 20 January 2006. During her admission to hospital, she came into contact with a nursing student, who developed measles 14 days later, on 3 February 2006, and was the first secondary case to be reported.

As patients were not always properly isolated (for example, during transportation between different wards), 12 patients (30%) in this outbreak were thought to have acquired infection through nosocomial transmission. Eight of the cases (20%) were in healthcare workers.

Figure 1. Number of measles cases by week of onset. Grosseto, Toscana, Italy, 2006

Figure 2. Number of measles cases by age group, outbreak in Grosseto, Toscana, Italy, 2006



Twenty six cases (65%) were laboratory confirmed, (65%) were laboratory confirmed, while the remaining 14 were epidemiologically linked. Measles virus genotype D4 was confirmed in samples from seven patients. No biological samples for measles confirmation were collected from the first patient, the 23 year old woman who had returned from India, as samples should be taken within seven days of rash onset, and the diagnosis was too late. However, measles virus was isolated from the first secondary case and had the same genomic sequence as all the other cases.

Of the 40 patients, 14 were admitted to hospital (35%), including 8 of the 12 patients who acquired measles by nosocomial transmission, and 6 of the remaining 28 cases. Complications recorded in the hospitalised patients included cholestatic hepatitis with cytonecrosis (7 cases; 50%), thrombocytopaenia (2; 14%), respiratory distress (1 case; 7%), brain oedema (7%), otitis media (7%), haemorrhagic lesions (7%), bacteraemia with isolation of Streptococcus capitis, (7%), and candidiasis of the mouth (7%). None of the patients died.

Only one patient reported having received measles vaccination, in 1982.

Actions taken and conclusions
In response to the first secondary case, active tracing of contacts began on 6 February 2006, and MMR vaccination was administered to individuals who were not vaccinated or who had previously received only one dose of measles-containing vaccine. In total, 27 contacts were vaccinated: 26 received their first MMR dose, and one was vaccinated with the second dose. No further cases were reported after 5 May.

Measles virus genotype D4 has been found to circulate in India [3], and outbreaks related to importation of this genotype were recently reported in Europe [4-6]. In this outbreak, measles transmission following importation occurred in a hospital. A similar experience recently occurred in northern Italy, in the autonomous province of Bozen [7], where a cluster of five measles cases, three of which were related to nosocomial transmission, were reported. This underlines the importance of verifying immunity and offering MMR vaccination to susceptible healthcare workers.

A high rate of admission to hospital was also observed. This is expected when measles infection is acquired by adults, who are more vulnerable to severe complications.

It must be stressed that recognition of this outbreak was only possible thanks to the implementation of the elimination plan for measles and congenital rubella and to the efforts of healthcare workers to implement laboratory confirmation of cases. The outbreak was extremely showed that a system of early warning and laboratory confirmation is feasible in Toscana. It will be crucial to properly investigate all suspected measles cases as the goal of measles elimination approaches.

References:
  1. Conferenza Permanente per i rapporti tra lo Stato, Regioni e le Province Autonome di Trento e Bolzano. Accordo sul Piano Nazionale di eliminazione del morbillo e della rosolia congenita. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 297 del 23 dicembre 2003 (Supplemento Ordinario n.195).
  2. Bonanni P, Bechini A, Pesavento G, Boccalini S, Tiscione E, Graziani G, Santini MG, Balocchini E, Pecori L, Peruzzi M, Mannelli F, Tomasi A, Montomoli E. Implementation of the Plan for Elimination of Measles and Congenital Rubella Infection in Tuscany: evidence of progress towards phase II of measles control. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene 2005; 64/3: 111-117.
  3. Ramamurty N, Raja D, Gunasekaran P, Varalakshmi E, Mohana S, Jin L. Investigation of measles and rubella outbreaks in Tamil Nadu, India-2003. J Med Virol. 2006;78(4):508-13.
  4. Siedler A, Tischer A, Mankertz A, Santibanez S. Two outbreaks of measles in Germany 2005. Euro Surveill 2006;11(4)[Epub ahead of print] (http://www.eurosurveillance.org/em/v11n04/1104-225.asp)
  5. van Treeck U. Measles outbreak in Germany: over 1000 cases now reported in Nordrhein Westfalen. Euro Surveill 2006;11(5):E060511.1. (http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2006/060511.asp#1)
  6. van Treeck U, Wichmann O. Measles outbreak in Germany: update. Euro Surveill 2006;11(4):E060413.1. (http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ew/2006/060413.asp#1)
  7. EUVAC.Net Latest news. Measles outbreaks in Italy (reported 24.07.06) (http://www.ssi.dk/euvac/outbreak/italy.html)

back to top



Back to Table of Contents
Previous Next

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2013. All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.