On 6 June 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published updates to its ‘Essential Medicines List’ (EML). Read more here.

Eurosurveillance is on the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals and in the SHERPA/RoMEO database. Read more here.

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

In this issue

Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2008: Volume 13/ Issue 49 Article 5
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

Eurosurveillance, Volume 13, Issue 49, 04 December 2008
Research articles
Increased number of Clostridium difficile infections and prevalence of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 001 in southern Germany
  1. Synlab Medical Care Service, Medical Care Centre Weiden, Weiden, Germany
  2. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  3. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  4. Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  5. Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom

Citation style for this article: Borgmann S, Kist M, Jakobiak T, Reil M, Scholz E, von Eichel-Streiber C, Gruber H, Brazier JS, Schulte B. Increased number of Clostridium difficile infections and prevalence of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 001 in southern Germany. Euro Surveill. 2008;13(49):pii=19057. Available online:
Date of submission: 03 September 2008

In recent years, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has emerged as an increasing problem, both in in- and outpatients. In a rural region of southern Germany, the annual number of C. difficile toxin (Tcd)-positive patients has increased from 95 to 796 in the period from 2000 to 2007. Simultaneously, the proportion of positive tests among all Tcd examinations has risen from 7.0% to 12.8%, indicating that the higher number of affected patients was not solely due to an increase in the number of assays. Elevated numbers of CDI have recently been associated with outbreaks of the ribotype 027 strain, particularly in North America. This strain has also been isolated in Europe, including in Germany. Ribotyping and PCR testing for binary toxin genes of C. difficile strains isolated from in- and outpatients demonstrate a predominance (59%) of C. difficile ribotype 001, which exhibits antibiotic resistance to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin, but lacks binary toxin genes. In summary, in our region of Germany, the number of patients affected by CDI has increased, probably due to spread of C. difficile ribotype 001. 



Numbers of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) are increasing in- and outside of Europe [1-5]. CDI in North America and partly also in western Europe have often been attributed to outbreaks caused by the hypervirulent strain NAP1/027 containing the binary toxin genes cdtA and cdtB [1,3,6]. Recently, this strain has also been isolated from patients in western Germany [7]. Different C. difficile strains are isolated in different European countries, suggesting a prevalence of particular strains in local settings [8-10].
CDI is usually regarded as a nosocomial infection that can be minimised by robust infection control practices and good antibiotic stewardship. In some hospitals in Europe it has become the most frequent nosocomial disease and consequently, analyses of C. difficile epidemiology were restricted to hospital outbreaks [11]. However, community-acquired cases of CDI have been observed for a few years now [12,13]. Interestingly, C. difficile strains associated with CDI in hospitalised patients were different from the ones isolated from community cases [13].

Our laboratory is located in a rural area in southern Germany. In this region, CDI is noticed as a growing nosocomial problem with sporadic fatal cases. However, the available information about the real extent of this apparent increase in CDI is limited. Furthermore, no studies have been done on distinct C. difficile strains in Germany or defined regions in Germany. We therefore collected data on the number of patients known to excrete C. difficile toxin (Tcd) in stool and on the number of patients analysed for Tcd. PCR was performed on C. difficile isolates from outpatients and from patients treated in two hospitals located in southern Germany, in order to gain knowledge about the epidemiological background of these regional strains.
Here we present data about the prevalence of a quinolone- and erythromycin-resistant C. difficile ribotype 001 strain in southern Germany.

Patients and methods

Laboratory and hospitals setting
The Synlab Medical Care Service analyses laboratory samples from about 40 hospitals and more than 2,000 physicians serving outpatients. In 2006 a total of 161,000 microbiological samples were examined. C. difficile was isolated from Tcd-positive stool samples from patients diagnosed at two hospitals (A and B) and from outpatients. Hospital A is a primary health care hospital with 270 beds comprising two tertiary university hospital facilities (cardiology, gastroenterology). In 2006, 10,793 patients were admitted to that hospital (74,146 patient days). Hospital B is a primary health care hospital with 135 beds, and 4,886 patients (34,811 patient days) were admitted to that clinic in 2006.

Epidemiolologic analysis of C. difficile in South Germany
Numbers of Tcd-positve stool samples and numbers of Tcd-positive patients were evaluated by the Hybase system (Cymed AG, Bochum, Germany) linked to the laboratory data system “promed open” (mcs, Eltville, Germany). Hybase ( is a computer programme that supports the surveillance of bacterial pathogens, e.g. calculation and documentation of the number of notifiable bacterial species.
Data (age, sex, outpatients versus inpatients, taking into account where they were treated) from patients with Tcd-positive stool in 2006 were documented.

C. difficile toxin analysis, culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing
Stool samples from inpatients of hospitals A and B were collected between May 2006 and March 2007 and tested for C. difficile. Samples from outpatients were collected between March and April 2007.
Tcd was examined by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detecting toxin A and B (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany). Bacterial cultures were grown on C. difficile-selective agar containing cefoxitin and cycloserin (Heipha, Eppelheim, Germany; under anaerobic conditions.
Identification of C. difficile was performed on rapid ID 32 A system (identification system for anaerobes, Biomerieux, Nürtingen, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using ATB ANA strips (susceptibility test for strict anaerobic bacteria, Biomerieux, Nürtingen, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s instructions or alternatively in an E-test procedure (for erythromycin, ciprofloxacine, moxifloxacine, cefotaxime; AB-Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). E-test results were confirmed at the German consiliary laboratories for C. difficile (Mainz) or gastrointestinal infections (Freiburg). Presence of binary toxin genes was examined at the German consiliary laboratory for C. difficile (Mainz) according to Stubbs et al. [14].

Ribotyping of C. difficile strains
Ribotyping was performed at the German consiliary laboratory for gastrointestinal infections (Freiburg). PCR ribotyping was performed according to he protocol of Bidet et al. [15] resulting in so-called “ribotype Freiburg”. In previous comparative analyses, representative isolates of each ribotype Freiburg had been sent to the Anaerobe Reference Laboratory in Cardiff for re-typing according to the “Cardiff” PCR ribotyping library in order to establish the correlation between ribotype Freiburg and the commonly used ribotype nomenclature of Stubbs et al. [16]. It was therefore possible to relate local PCR results not only to “ribotype Freiburg” but also to European C. difficle ribotypes.


Over the past years, reported numbers of patients affected by C. difficile infection (CDI) have increased markedly in Germany [4]. Figures 1-3 show a comparison of the number of stool samples tested for C. difficile toxin (Tcd) with the number of Tcd-positive stool samples in the period between 2000 and 2007.

Figure 1. Number of patients examined by Tcd ELISA, southern Germany, 2000-2007

Figure 2. Number of Tcd-positive patients, southern Germany, 2000-2007

Figure 3. Percentage of Tcd-positive patients per year, southern Germany, 2000-2007

The number of patients analysed for Tcd increased by 458% (from 1,358 to 6,214; Figure 1), but the actual number of Tcd-positive samples increased by 838% in the same period of time (from 95 to 796; Figure 2). The percentage of Tcd-positive patients increased from 7.0% in 2000 to 12.8% in 2007, with two peaks in 2003 (15.0%) and in 2006 (17.1%; Figure 3). As demonstrated by Figure 3, the peak in 2003 predominantly resulted from a high proportion of Tcd-positive outpatients (18.0%). In contrast, the peak in 2006 was caused by Tcd-positive inpatients (17.8%).

In summary, these data indicate that the increasing numbers of CDI in this region are real and not simply a result of increasing analysis efforts. Furthermore, not only hospitalised patients but also non-hospitalised patients were affected by CDI.
Previous reports have identified high age as an important risk factor for contracting CDI [4,5]. A representative list concentrating on the age and sex distribution of patients who had Tcd-positive stools in 2006 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Number and characteristics of in- and outpatients with C. difficile toxin-positive stool samples, southern Germany, 2006


A total of 784 patients were registered in our database, 17.3% of which were outpatients. Looking at the median age, the majority were elderly patients. Interestingly, the median age of outpatients (69 years) was lower than that of inpatients (77 years). In addition, Tcd-positive women tended to be older than Tcd-positive men.

To assess the cause for the increasing numbers of Tcd-positive patients via spread of hypervirulent C. difficile 027, ribotyping of C. difficile was performed on isolates from Tcd-positive stool samples previously collected from outpatients and from patients treated in two different hospitals in southern Germany (Hospitals A and B).
As shown in Table 2, at least seven different C. difficile ribotypes could be identified. While C. difficile ribotype 001 was isolated from  11 patients, other types were only isolated once from a single patient. C. difficile ribotype 001 was isolated from inpatients of both hospitals and was also common in outpatients indicating a predominance of this strain in this region.

Table 2. Characterisation of C. difficile isolates obtained from Tcd-positive stool samples collected between May 2006 and March 2007 in southern Germany


Ribotype 001 C. difficile lacked the binary toxin genes but was resistant to quinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacine, moxifloxacine) as well as to erythromycin, cefotaxime (MIC >16 g/mL) and clindamycin. However, ribotype 001 strains were susceptible to ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, vancomycin and metronidazole.

Worldwide – as well as in Germany – there is a discussion about increasing case numbers of CDI-affected patients [1-5]. In this study we demonstrate that the number of Tcd-positive patients increased markedly in southern Germany in the period between 2000 and 2006. It was assumed that this might be a result of intensified examination efforts, as from 2000 to 2007, the total number of stool samples examined for Tcd per year increased, too. However, the percentage of Tcd-positive patients also increased markedly during this period (from 7.0 to 12.8%) showing a maximum in 2006 (17.1%). This higher ratio indicates that the increased number of Tcd-positive patients is a real phenomenon and not solely due to the fact that examination efforts were stepped up.
Between 2006 and 2007, the number of CDI-affected patients remained constant, although the number of patients examined for CDI increased. This finding suggests that the intensified infection control measures may have been successful in preventing the nosocomial spread of C. difficile. However, the possibility to separate between nosocomial and community acquired CDI is limited by the lack of patient data.
In agreement with earlier studies [4,5], Tcd-positive stool samples were mainly obtained from elderly patients. The fact that 136 of 784 Tcd-positive patients (17.3%) in 2006 were outpatients clearly shows that CDI was not restricted to hospitalised patients. On the other hand, the median age of Tcd-positive inpatients was higher than that of Tcd-positive outpatients, an indication that CDI in younger people has a milder course and does not require hospital admission.

The C. difficile 027 strain was detected in Germany for the first time in 2007 [7]. However, the ribotyping  results presented here reveal that this strain was not prevalent in northern Bavaria. In contrast, multi-resistant C. difficile 001 were frequently found. For this analysis, C. difficile were cultured from Tcd-positive stool samples from in- and outpatients. The hospitalised patients had been treated at two hospitals located about 200 km apart. Since C. difficile type 001 was also isolated from outpatients, it is obvious that this strain is predominant in southern Germany.
All tested ribotype 001 C. difficile proved to be resistant to erythromycin and moxifloxacine in the antibiotic susceptibility testing, a feature commonly observed for ribotypes 001, 027 and 106 [6,17]. Ribotyping and binary toxin gene analysis showed that all of these C. difficile strains were different from the NAP1/027 strain. Recently, it has been discussed whether ribotype 027 strains could be more virulent than other ribotypes [11,18]. Only scarce clinical information - reported anecdotally - is available about the death of several patients. Nevertheless, it is clear that severe courses of CDI in our region are not limited to ribotype 027 isolates.

Ribotyping further revealed that more than 50% of C. difficile isolates exhibited identical features, a possible indication of clonal spread within the local population. In the case of increased CDI case numbers due to admission of affected patients bearing predominantly ribotype 001, proven clonality of C. difficile isolates by ribotyping might erroneously suggest nosocomial spread. Under the given circumstances of many C. difficile isolates being clonally related, this typing method therefore provides only limited information for outbreak analyses in a defined hospital. Consequently, use of more discriminatory typing methods, e.g. multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), may be better suited for future epidemiological studies, at least if ribotype 001 or other frequently occuring ribotypes are involved [19].

In summary, the present study shows an increase of Tcd-positive patient numbers in southern Germany. Multi-resistant C. difficile ribotype 001 is prevalent in southern Germany, and this strain is thought to be responsible for severe, if not fatal, cases of CDI. In due course, more discriminatory methods may be able to improve our understanding of the epidemiology of this successful strain.

The authors thank Andrea Kick, Angela Galbakioti, Corinna Kreisl, Kerstin Müller, Birgit Scherer, and Rebecca Arnold for excellent technical assistance.




1. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2433-41.
2. Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Tüll P; ESCMID Study Group for Clostridium difficile; EU Member States; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12 Suppl. 6:2-18.
3. Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Brazier JS, Suetens C, Drudy D, Wiuff C, et al. Update of Clostridium difficile-associated disease due to PCR ribotype 027 in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2007;12(6):pii=714. Available from: 
4. Vonberg RP, Schwab F, Gastmeier P. Clostridium difficile in discharged inpatients, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(1):179-80.
5. Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2442-9.
6. Brazier JS, Raybould R, Patel B, Duckworth G, Pearson A, Charlett A, et al. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in English hospitals, 2007-08. Euro Surveill. 2008;13(41):pii=19000. Availablefrom: 
7. Weil HP, Brüning T, Fischer-Brügge U, Kuijper E, Kühnen E. Clostridium difficile: Neuer hochvirulenter Stamm nachgewiesen. Dtsch Arztebl. 2007;104:A-3308.
8. Indra A, Schmid D, Huhulescu S, Hell M, Gattringer R, Hasenberger P, et al. Characterization of clinical Clostridium difficile isolates by PCR ribotyping and detection of toxin genes in Austria, 2006-2007. J Med Microbiol. 2007;57(Pt 6):702-8.
9. Pituch H, van Leeuwen W, Maquelin K, Wultanska D, Obuch-Woszczatynski P, Nurzynska G, et al. Toxin profiles and resistances to macrolides and newer fluoroquinolones as epidemicity determinants of clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile from Warsaw, Poland. J. Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(5):1607-10.
10. Terhes G, Brazier JS, Urbán E, Sóki J, Nagy E. Distribution of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in regions of Hungary. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(Pt 3):279-82.
11. Kuijper EJ, van den Berg RJ, Debast S, Visser CE, Veenendaal D, Troelstra A, et al. Clostridium difficile ribotype 027, toxinotype III, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(5):827-30.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillance for community-associated Clostridium difficile--Connecticut, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(13):340-3.
13. Bignardi GE, Settle C. Different ribotypes in community-acquired Clostridium difficile. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(1):96-8
14. Stubbs S, Rupnik M, Gibert M, Brazier J, Duerden B, Popoff M. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;186(2):307-12.
15. Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;175(2):261-6.
16. Stubbs SL, Brazier JS, O'Neill GL, Duerden BI. PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(2):461-3.
17. Barbut F, Mastrantonio P, Delmée M, Brazier J, Kuijper E, Poxton I, et al. Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(11):1048-57.
18. Morgan OW, Rodrigues B, Elston T, Verlander NQ, Brown DF, Brazier J, et al. Clinical Severity of Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 027: A Case-Study. PLoS ONE 2008;3(3):e1812.
19. Killgore G, Thompson A, Johnson S, Brazier J, Kuijper E, Pepin J, et al. Comparison of seven techniques for typing international epidemic strains of Clostridium difficile: restriction endonuclease analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR-ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and surface layer protein A gene sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(2):431-7.

Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.