Announcements
Eurosurveillance remains in the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It was first added to the DOAJ on 9 September 2004. Eurosurveillance is also listed in the Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access / Rights MEtadata for Open archiving (SHERPA/RoMEO) [2], a database which uses a colour‐coding scheme to classify publishers according to their self‐archiving policy and to show the copyright and open access self-archiving policies of academic journals. Eurosurveillance is listed there as a ‘green’ journal, which means that authors can archive pre-print (i.e. pre-refereeing), post-print (i.e. final draft post-refereeing) and archive the publisher's version/PDF.

ESCAIDE participants are invited to the fifth Eurosurveillance scientific seminar on 30 November 2016

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

Read our articles on Zika virus infection

Note of concern published for 'Epidemiological investigation of MERS-CoV spread in a single hospital in South Korea, May to June 2015', http://bit.ly/29QFXPp


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2010: Volume 15/ Issue 6 Article 5
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

Eurosurveillance, Volume 15, Issue 6, 11 February 2010
Surveillance and outbreak reports
Microbiological and molecular investigation of an increase of human listeriosis in Belgium, 2006-2007
  1. Scientific Institute of Public Health, Section of Bacteriology, Brussels, Belgium

Citation style for this article: Yde M, Botteldoorn N, Bertrand S, Collard JM, Dierick K. Microbiological and molecular investigation of an increase of human listeriosis in Belgium, 2006-2007. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(6):pii=19482. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19482
Date of submission: 30 June 2009

In Belgium, the majority of cases of listeriosis are sporadic cases. In this study we present evidence for an episode of listeriosis: a time-linked cluster of cases that occurred in 2006 and 2007, and the identification of identical strains. The episode involved 11 patients, infected with Listeria monocytogenes of serovar 4b. The source of infection was not detected.


Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive intracellular food-borne pathogen. In some groups (immunosuppressed people, neonates, pregnant women and their unborn children) it can be an important cause of life-threatening bacteraemia and meningitis. Because listeriosis has a long incubation time (three to 60 days), it is often difficult to trace the source of infection. This explains why the vast majority of cases are notified as single cases. Nevertheless some well-documented outbreaks of listeriosis have been reported from Finland [1], France [2], Switzerland [3], the United Kingdom (UK) [4] and United States (US) [5].  In Belgium, one outbreak of listeriosis has been described in 2001 [6]; data from one additional study were inconclusive [7]. In the present study, 36 clinical human strains from hospital laboratories and five food isolates were characterised by serotyping, metal resistance typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). This combination provided us with the opportunity to link strains from 11 sporadic cases.

Methods

Patients were not systematically interviewed about their food habits; clinical data were provided by clinical laboratories.

Identification and molecular typing
Since 1966, the Belgian Listeria Reference Centre (BLRC) has received hospital-isolated strains of L. monocytogenes on a voluntary basis. Strain identification is carried out with the api Listeria kit (bioMérieux, France). All strains are serotyped according to a standard protocol [8] using a commercial agglutination test (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) for somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens. Strain susceptibility to arsenic and cadmium is determined according to McLauchlin et al. [9]. Molecular typing is performed if a cluster of isolates is suspected based on geographical considerations, on the occurrence of multiple cases within a short period of time or a cluster of isolates with identical serotype.

PFGE is done following the US PulseNet protocol [10] after DNA digestion with ApaI and AscI. Analysis of the banding pattern is performed with the ImageMaster video documentation system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and Fingerprinting II Informatix software (Bio-Rad). DNA extraction for Random Amplified of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is done with the QI Amp DNA Mini Kit; primer HLWL 74 and the PCR conditions have been described by Wernars et al. [11].

Isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from food
25 g of food sample were added to 225 ml of Half Fraser broth for 24 h at 30°C, followed by the inoculation of 0.1 ml into 10 ml of Frazer broth and incubation for 24 h at 37°C. Following enrichment, 500 µl of the culture was used in the VIDAS LM02 test (bioMérieux). If positive, 10 µl of the Fraser enrichment broth were subcultured on two media: RAPID L. Mono (Bio-rad) and ALOA (bioMérieux). Colonies characteristic of L. monocytogenes were further confirmed with the api Listeria kit.

Results

BLRC receives annually between 30 and 68 strains of human clinical listeriosis cases, representing an annual incidence of three to six cases per million inhabitants. This incidence is comparable to the rates reported by other industrialised countries.

In 2006, 56 clinical strains were received: 19 of them were of serovar 4b. Monthly baseline isolations of serovar 4b varied between none and two. However, in October and November 2006, five and six strains were isolated, respectively, suggesting a possible episode of listeriosis (Figure 1). These 11 isolates were first differentiated by metal resistance typing. Three metal resistance types were found: arsenic sensitive – cadmium resistant (SR) (one strain), arsenic and cadmium resistant (RR) (two strains), and arsenic and cadmium sensitive (SS) (eight strains). It was clear that the episodic strain was of SS phenotype.

Figure 1. Clinical isolates of Listeria monocytogenes serovar 4b received at the Belgian Listeria Reference Centre, by month, 2006 (n=19)

 

The eight strains of phenotype 4b SS were further subtyped by PFGE. They belonged to three different pulsovars, with pulsovar A represented by six strains (Figure 2). The remaining two strains belonged to a different pulsovar. One of these pulsovars (B) was phylogenetic related to pulsovar A with a similarity index of 92,31% (Fingerprinting II Informatix software application).

Figure 2.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis AscI and ApaI profiles of Listeria monocytogenes pulsovar A    

        
                                                  
                   
To evaluate the duration of the episode, the remaining strains of phenotype 4b – SS from 2006 and those isolated in 2007 were subtyped with PFGE. Another five strains (all from 2007) were found with a profile indistinguishable from the episodic strain. The rate of isolation in 2007 was irregular: January (one strain), February (one strain), March (one strain), July (two strains) (Figure 3). The last two cases were geographically linked, indicating a local extension of the episode. Before the onset of the episode, strains with pulsovar A were very uncommon: only one strain was identified in 2005.

Figure 3. Monthly distribution of the episodic Listeria monocytogenes strain (4b,SS, pulsovar A), Belgium, October 2006-July 2007 (n=11)

 

A total of 11 cases appear to have been involved in this episode (six in 2006 and five in 2007). The patients’ characteristics are outlined in the Table. Of the positive cultures of these patients, nine were from blood and two from cerebrospinal fluid; four cases were pregnant women or newborns. One pregnant woman had a twin stillbirth. The episode was not geographically clustered, as the isolates were received from three different regions in Belgium: Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels.

Table. Patients’ characteristics of the listeriosis episode, Belgium, October 2006-July 2007 (n=11)

  

The episode was first recognised by the BLRC in November 2006. Only on four occasions were patients asked about their food habits. No standardised questionnaire was used. Suspected food samples were taken from the patients’ refrigerators or from the same batch of the suspected food at the retail level. Smoked salmon was sampled because in a case of preterm birth, the mother remembered having eaten smoked salmon. Raw beef brains were the only suspected food item in a case of septicaemia. The woman with the twin stillbirth reported having eaten pre-packed lasagne; this food item was suspected after some of her housemates presented with gastroenteritis. However, L. monocytogenes could not be detected in any of these samples.

As the contamination source was not found, another line of investigation was followed. We searched the BLRC food isolations collection for a strain with the same characteristics as the episodic strain. Among the food isolates received at BLRC in 2006 and 2007, only six strains were of phenotype 4b-SS. They were subtyped with RAPD. Two strains isolated from poultry preparations matched the episodic strain RADP profile. However, these strains were of a different pulsovar, which excludes them from being involved in the episode.

Discussion

In Belgium, the majority of listeriosis cases are reported as single cases. Clinical laboratories mandatorily report cases to the community health authorities. However, these authorities rarely receive information on strain characteristics, which does not facilitate linking sporadic cases. Clinical laboratories may submit their isolates to the BLRC. It is estimated that the BLRC receives approximately 70% of the total number of clinical isolates in Belgium. As the BLRC performs strain typing, clusters of identical strains are easily recognised.

The combination of serotyping, metal resistance typing and PFGE led to the identification of 11 identical isolates. The episodic strain was of serovar 4b, sensitive to arsenic and cadmium and belonged to pulsovar A. Six of them were isolated within a period of a few weeks which is exceptional for a small country like Belgium. Besides the cluster isolations in 2006, the episodic strain was isolated from a further five patients in 2007, indicating a long extension of the episode which went on until July 2007.

The source of contamination was not detected. Two factors may have contributed to this failure: no systematic interviewing of the patients and unsuccessful food sampling. During this episode only four patients were contacted by community health inspectors and only three different food samples were taken which proved to be negative for L. monocytogenes in 25 g. On the other hand, the episodic strain was not present in the BLRC collection of food strains, which therefore could not provide a clue for potential suspected food items to be investigated.

Not finding the implicated food is not exceptional. In 1987, 23 cases of listeriosis in the UK were attributed to a strain of unusual serotype designated 4b(X); the implicated food was not identified [12]. In the Netherlands, cluster analysis based on serotyping and PFGE showed one cluster of 15 listeriosis cases without the identification of a clear source of infection [13].

Serovar 4b is not unusual. In Europe and North-America, most published outbreaks of listeriosis in the past 20 years have involved 4b [14]. In addition, strains of serovar 4b tend to be overrepresented in perinatal listeriosis, suggesting that they may have special virulence attributes for pregnancy and breach of the blood-placenta barrier. In the cluster described here, four of the 11 cases were pregnancy-related.

It is presumed that the episodic strain was particularly virulent because it involved a relatively high number of pregnancy-related cases and meningitis cases, four of 11 and two of 11 respectively. According to annual data from the BLRC, strains from cases with maternal-neonatal listeriosis represent 10% of the total number of clinical strains; a similar proportion is observed for cases with meningitis.

It is generally accepted that persons with an underlying disease are more susceptible to contracting listeriosis. In this episode, information from only three patients was available. As it not mandatory for clinical laboratories to report to the BLRC, a lot of epidemiological data are ignored.

During this episode of listeriosis, we received a human Listeria strain closely related to the episodic strain. This strain was of serovar 4b, sensitive to arsenic and cadmium but represented another pulsovar (B). Pulsovar B differs from pulsovar A by only three bands in the ApaI profile. According to Tenover et al. [15], two profiles that differ by only three bands are considered as closely related. However, the similarity index between the two profiles was 92.31% and thus lower than 95%, the minimum level for highly related strains. Therefore this strain was excluded from the episode.

This episode would have passed unnoticed had not the BLRC performed strain typing. Efficient monitoring of listeriosis requires systematic interviewing of the patients using a standardised questionnaire. Close cooperation between community health inspectors, the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC) and the BLRC would result in a rapid linking of sporadic cases and enhance the chance of finding the infection source in outbreaks.


References

  1. Maijala R, Lyytikäinen O, Autio T, Aalto T, Haavisto L, Honkanen-Buzalski T. Exposure of Listeria monocytogenes within an epidemic caused by butter in Finland. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;70(1-2):97-109.
  2. de Valk H, Vaillant V, Jacquet C, Rocourt J, Le Querrec F, Stainer F, et al. Two consecutive nationwide outbreaks of Listeriosis in France, October 1999 - February 2000. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(10):944-50.
  3. Bille J, Blanc DS, Schmid H, Boubaker K, Baumgartner A, Siegrist HH, et al. Outbreak of human listeriosis associated with tomme cheese in northwest Switzerland, 2005. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(6):91-3. pii=633. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=633
  4. Dawson SJ, Evans MR, Willby D, Bardwell J, Chamberlain N, Lewis DA. Listeria outbreak associated with sandwich consumption from a hospital retail shop, United Kingdom. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(6):89-91. pii=632. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=632
  5. Mead PS, Dunne EF, Graves L, Wiedmann M, Patrick M, Hunter S, et al. Nationwide outbreak of listeriosis due to contaminated meat. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134(4):744-51.
  6. Doumith M, Jacquet C, Goulet V, Oggioni C, Van Loock F, Buchrieser C, et al. Use of DNA arrays for the analysis of outbreak-related strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006;296(8):559-62.
  7. Yde M, Genicot A. Use of PFGE to characterize clonal relationships among Belgian clinical isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:399-402.
  8. Seeliger HP, Höhne K. Serotyping of Listeria monocytogenes and related species. Methods Microbiol. 1979;13:31-49.
  9. McLauchlin J, Hampton MD, Shah S, Threlfall EJ, Wieneke AA, Curtis GD. Subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes on the basis of plasmid profiles and arsenic and cadmium susceptibility. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83(3):381-8.
  10. Graves LM, Swaminathan B. PulseNet standardized protocol for subtyping Listeria monocytogenes by macrorestriction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;65(1-2):55-62.
  11. Wernars K, Boerlin P, Audurier A, Russell EG, Curtis GD, Herman L, et al. The WHO multicenter study on Listeria monocytogenes subtyping: random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Int. J.Food Microbiol. 1996;32:325-41.
  12. McLauchlin J, Crofts N, Campbell DM. A possible outbreak of listeriosis caused by an unusual strain of Listeria monocytogenes. J Infect. 1989;18(2):179-187.
  13. Doorduyn Y, de Jager CM, van der Zwaluw WK, Wannet WJ, van der Ende A, Spanjaard L, et al. First results of the active surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes infections in the Netherlands reveal higher than expected incidence. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(4):E060420.4. pii=2945. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=2945
  14. Kathariou S. Listeria monocytogenes virulence and pathogenicity, a food safety perspective. J Food Prot. 2002;65(11):1811-29.
  15. Tenover F C, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233-9.


Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf)

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN 1560-7917] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved.
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.