Announcements
Eurosurveillance remains in the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It was first added to the DOAJ on 9 September 2004. Eurosurveillance is also listed in the Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access / Rights MEtadata for Open archiving (SHERPA/RoMEO) [2], a database which uses a colour‐coding scheme to classify publishers according to their self‐archiving policy and to show the copyright and open access self-archiving policies of academic journals. Eurosurveillance is listed there as a ‘green’ journal, which means that authors can archive pre-print (i.e. pre-refereeing), post-print (i.e. final draft post-refereeing) and archive the publisher's version/PDF.

ESCAIDE participants are invited to the fifth Eurosurveillance scientific seminar on 30 November 2016

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

Read our articles on Zika virus infection

Read our articles on mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance

Note of concern published for 'Epidemiological investigation of MERS-CoV spread in a single hospital in South Korea, May to June 2015', http://bit.ly/29QFXPp


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2011: Volume 16/ Issue 31 Article 1
Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf)
Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 16, Issue 31, 04 August 2011
Editorials
Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4: are we prepared now?
  1. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands

Citation style for this article: Friedrich AW. Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4: are we prepared now?. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(31):pii=19938. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19938

It is over. The outbreak of the enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O104:H4 infection that had its major focus in Germany [1] and affected people in many other European countries has officially come to an end [2]. While the media coverage has been decreasing, the scientific community has been working to understand the reason why this dramatic outbreak occurred. We have learnt that the pathogen is not a totally new clone, but is a slight variant of a known – although rarely described – EHEC, called HUSEC-41 [3] with an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) resistance. Furthermore, the strain carries genes typically found in two types of pathogenic E. coli, the enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and EHEC [4,5]. It specifically carries the genes for the classical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS)-associated Shiga toxin 2.

Despite the efforts that have been made, major questions currently remain unanswered, such as why women were affected more than men, why the attack rate was so high, what the primary source was and what the reservoir is, how long people are carriers, what the importance of the ESBL resistance is, what the infectious dose is for this outbreak strain and what the role of secondary transmission is via symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers, directly to other persons or indirectly via an index source, such as food.

It is known that up to 15% of EHEC cases can be a result of secondary transmission arising from household contact with people who have sporadic EHEC infections [6]. In this issue of Eurosurveillance, two articles, Aldabe et al. [7] and Hauri et al. [8] report on secondary transmission during the EHEC O104:H4 outbreak. The first reports on a symptomatic man who transmitted EHEC to his wife and young daughter during the EHEC O104:H4 infection in France [7]. Interestingly, the EHEC that was isolated from the mother apparently lost its ESBL resistance, confirming the known mobility of plasmids carrying resistance genes. This fact should be taken into consideration in diagnostic laboratories if ESBL resistance of EHEC O104:H4 is used for primary selection of the pathogen from stools without using also non-selective enrichment and detection of Shiga toxin genes.

The second article [8] illustrates in detail the history of six possible household transmissions, two possible nosocomial and one possible laboratory transmission in the German State of Hesse, where satellite clusters occurred. These cases throw light on three crucial issues. First, secondary transmission of EHEC O104:H4 was shown not to be more frequent than expected. Second, the importance of microbiological serotyping was highlighted, as EHEC of other HUS-associated serogoups (O157, O91, and O103) were also identified during the outbreak. Serotyping data are rarely available, due to the need for time-consuming techniques usually only carried out in specialised reference labs. This shows the need for the development of rapid sero- and pathotyping methods for all HUS-associated E. coli strains. Third, infection control in hospitalised patients with EHEC infection needs specific consideration, as does laboratory safety in the handling of EHEC. It is not without reason that in most countries of the European Union EHEC is classified as a biosafety level (BSL)-3** microorganism (but no high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter is required).

Both articles illustrate the importance of personal hygiene in preventing secondary transmission. In general, EHEC does not behave differently to any other organism transmitted via the faecal–oral route, but our ‘preventive doors’ for such organisms seem to stay wide open. We have become used to the fact that hundreds of thousands of Europeans have diarrhoea every year and a certain lack of basic hygiene seems to be acceptable, as usually nothing very severe happens. We often lack time for hand hygiene as we consider it not to be of great importance. However, diarrhoea is not a normal state. We forget that most enteropathogens are less infectious than EHEC or do not lead to such severe disease with such social visibility. This brings us to the biggest challenge. Circulating highly pathogenic and/or multiresistant microorganisms can be detected at a very early stage, before large outbreaks of disease occur. Preventive microbiology is a basis for preventive medical advice and decision-making to protect people from infections. In future, European-wide coordination of preventive microbiology will be crucial for early detection of major health threats caused by infectious diseases. Its success will depend on our international and interdisciplinary efforts to foster protection against infection.

This outbreak is over. Let us get prepared!


References
  1. Frank C, Werber D, Cramer JP, Askar M, Faber M, an der Heiden M, et al. Epidemic profile of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany - preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 22. [Epub ahead of print]
  2. Robert Koch Institute (RKI).  Informationen zum EHEC/HUS-Ausbruchsgeschehen – Ende des Ausbruchs [Information about the EHEC/HUS-outbreak– end of the outbreak ]. Berlin: RKI; 2011. German. Available from: http://www.rki.de/cln_117/nn_467482/DE/Content/InfAZ/E/EHEC/Info-HUS,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/Info-HUS.pdf
  3. Mellmann A, Bielaszewska M, Köck R, Friedrich AW, Fruth A, Middendorf B, et al. Analysis of collection of hemolytic uremic syndrome-associated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(8):1287-90.
  4. Bielaszewska M, Mellmann A, Zhang W, Köck R, Fruth A, Bauwens A, et al. Characterisation of the Escherichia coli strain associated with an outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Germany, 2011: a microbiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Jun 22. [Epub ahead of print]
  5. Mellmann A, Harmsen D, Cummings CA, Zentz EB, Leopold SR, Rico A, et al. Prospective genomic characterization of the German enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak by rapid next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22751.
  6. Parry SM, Salmon RL. Sporadic STEC O157 infection: secondary household transmission in Wales. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:657-61.
  7. Aldabe B, Delmas Y, Gault G, Vendrely B, Llanas B, Charron M, et al. Household transmission of haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with Escherichia coli O104:H4, south-western France, June 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(31):pii=19934. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19934
  8. Hauri AM, Götsch U, Strotmann I, Krahn J, Bettge-Weller G, Westbrock HJ, et al. Secondary transmissions during the outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104 in Hesse, Germany, 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(31):pii=19937. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19937 


Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf)
Next

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN 1560-7917] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved.
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.