Eurosurveillance banner




Announcements
Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2012: Volume 17/ Issue 8 Article 3 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf) Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 17, Issue 8, 23 February 2012
Rapid communications
First detection of tick-borne “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Denmark 2011
  1. Technical University of Denmark (DTU) National Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Citation style for this article: Fertner ME, Mølbak L, Boye Pihl TP, Fomsgaard A, Bødker R. First detection of tick-borne “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Denmark 2011. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(8):pii=20096. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20096
Date of submission: 09 February 2012

This is the first reporting of the tick-borne zoonotic bacterium “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Denmark. A total of 2,625 Ixodes ricinus ticks from 58 locations in Denmark were collected and analysed for “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”. A nested PCR revealed the presence of the bacterium at three geographically separate locations, which indicates that it is widely established in ticks.


Background

Since 2009, “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis” has been correlated with severe disease in immunocompromised people. A total of six human cases originating from Sweden [1], Germany [2], Switzerland [3] and the Czech Republic [4] have been described in the literature. In 2011, the bacterium was also isolated from a post-operative dog in Germany [5]. General clinical features in human patients have included recurrent fever, erysipelas-like rashes, arthralgias and thromboembolisms [1-4]. The infection responds well to doxycycline [1]. The pathogenic potential of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” may be correlated with its putative tropism for endothelial cells [2,4].

So far little is known on the distribution, risk areas and reservoir of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”. If the infectious cycle resembles the other Ehrlichia bacteria, it has its reservoir in wild mammals and is transmitted by ticks. Accidentally humans may become infected [6]. In this study we examined Ixodes ricinus ticks in Denmark for the presence of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” using PCR. This is the first survey for “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in Denmark and in ticks in northern Europe.

Sampling methods and analysis

The analysed ticks originated from two different sampling procedures (Table): ticks collected by flagging (n=1,552) and a tick DNA/RNA archive (n=1,073).

Table. Ticks collected by two different sampling procedures in Denmark in 2010 and 2011 (n=2,625)

Flagging was performed during September 2011 at four distinct localities known for an abundance of ticks and a recent history of human cases of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). A white flannel flag was dragged over the vegetation and 1,552 ticks collected into plastic containers. These were frozen a few hours after collection and stored at -20˚C for up to one month before DNA extraction. The flagging for ticks was carried out as part of a project investigating TBE virus. However, with the emergence of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” as a public concern in our neighbouring countries, the DNA was additionally screened for the presence of this potentially emerging pathogen in December 2011 and January 2012.

Furthermore, a tick archive was investigated for the presence of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”. During 2010 and 2011, the Veterinary Institute’s National Center for Wildlife Health collected 1,073 ticks from roe deer submitted for diagnosis and routine surveillance from 53 locations in Denmark. A sample of 40 ticks from a domestic sheep flock was additionally included in the archive. After removal, ticks were stored in ethanol for up to 1.5 years. DNA and RNA were extracted and stored as a tick archive of genetic material.

Before laboratory analysis, ticks from sites with large sample sizes were distributed into smaller pools (Table). Ticks were crushed and homogenised in 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The homogenate was centrifuged and supernatant collected and stored at -80˚C until DNA was extracted from 200 µL homogenate in a MagNA Pure 96 robot using MagNa Pure 96 DNA and Viral Nucleic Acid Small Volume Kit version 4.0 (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the universal bacterial primers 519F (5'-CCA GCA GCC GCG GTA ATA C-3') and 1054R (5'-ACG AGC TGA CGA CRR CCA TG-3') [7]. This was followed by a nested PCR with newly designed 16 S rRNA gene primers specific for “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”: micurensis729F (5’-GGC GAC TAT CTG GCT CAG-3’) and micurensis1016R (5’-GCC AAA CTG ACT CTT CCG-3’). The positive PCR amplicons were sequenced on an ABI PRISM 373 DNA Sequencer (PE Biosystems, Foster City, United States) and aligned with published 16S rRNA gene sequences using SEQMATCH in the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu).

Results

Three of the 79 pools contained ticks positive for “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”; they originated from three locations separated from each other by the sea (Figure).

Figure. Location of tick collection, Denmark, 2010 and 2011 (n=1,552)

The first positive sample came from flagging in Øster Sømarken on the island of Bornholm. From this location six pools with a total of 467 ticks were collected. One pool, containing 100 nymphs, was found positive for “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”. The second positive pool was found after flagging in the forest of Tokkekøb Hegn in Northern Zealand in the same one-hectare area where emerging TBE in both I. ricinus and humans were reported in 2009 [8]. At this location eight pools with a total of 736 ticks were collected, of which one, containing 100 nymphs, was found positive. The third positive sample originated from a pool of 12 male and 28 female ticks collected for the tick archive from domestic free-grazing sheep in the area of Viborg on the Danish mainland. All three isolates were verified to be 100% similar to 16S rRNA gene sequences from “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis”.

Discussion

Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” belongs to the  family Anaplasmataceae [9] which comprises a variety of emerging tick-borne human pathogenic bacteria [10]. Former studies have suggested a potential widespread occurrence of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” in the wild fauna of Asia and Europe, including our neighbouring countries [9,11-14], but it has never been reported in Denmark. In this study we examined 2,625 I. ricinus ticks divided in 79 pools and identified the presence of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” at three distinct locations, indicating that the bacterium is widely distributed in the Danish tick population.

The recorded minimum prevalence of three of 2,625 was, however, substantially lower than that found in  studies from  the Netherlands in 2006, the Baltic regions of Russia in 1997–98 and a recent central European study, which  all estimated 6–7% of the ticks to carry the bacterium [12,14,15]. The latter study investigated ticks from the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland and Portugal and found a prevalence ranging from 0% to 10% that was highest in the Czech Republic and Germany [14]. In southern Sweden, “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” was in 2008 found to be widespread in the wild rodents of this region with a prevalence ranging from 0% to 12.5% in the investigated locations [11].

An increase and spread of other tick-borne infections such as Lyme borreliosis and TBE, has been reported in Denmark and neighbouring countries. This trend has been attributed to increased awareness, climate change and increasing tick populations [16,17]. In this study the tick-borne pathogen was found at a known TBE site on Bornholm and at an emerging TBE site in Tokkekøb Hegn forest [8]. The recent appearance of several human clinical cases of “Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis” infection in Europe, as well as the findings in the wild fauna, indicate that this is an emerging tick-borne pathogen. However, lack of knowledge and a diagnostic test combined with a low pathogenic potential may have hindered previous detection in Denmark. Whether or not the newly reported cases are the result of previous misdiagnosis or a true emerging risk, it is important that medical doctors in the affected areas are aware of the risk for immunocompromised patients. The State Serum Institute will now establish a diagnostic assay. Finding the pathogen on production animals suggests there may be veterinary risk as well.


Acknowledgements
Tick-sampling was funded by Baxter, while laboratory work was carried out as part of a two-year collaboration on tick-borne pathogen detection between the Club5 institutes ANSES in France, SVA in Sweden, CVI in the Netherlands and DTU in Denmark 2011–12. Anne Lyhning Jensen and Christian Fertner are acknowledged for skilful technical assistance.


References

  1. Welinder-Olsson C, Kjellin E, Vaht K, Jacobsson S, Wenneras C. First case of human "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" infection in a febrile patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(5):1956-9.
  2. von Loewenich FD, Geissdorfer W, Disque C, Matten J, Schett G, Sakka SG, et al. Detection of "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" in two patients with severe febrile illnesses: evidence for a European sequence variant. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(7):2630-5.
  3. Fehr JS, Bloemberg GV, Ritter C, Hombach M, Luscher TF, Weber R, et al. Septicemia caused by tick-borne bacterial pathogen Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(7):1127-9.
  4. Pekova S, Vydra J, Kabickova H, Frankova S, Haugvicova R, Mazal O, et al. Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis infection identified in 2 hematooncologic patients: benefit of molecular techniques for rare pathogen detection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;69(3):266-70.
  5. Diniz PP, Schulz BS, Hartmann K, Breitschwerdt EB. "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" infection in a dog from Germany. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(5):2059-62.
  6. Bakken JS, Dumler JS. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytotropic anaplasmosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:236-47.
  7. Schwieger F, Tebbe CC. A new approach to utilize PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16s rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. Appl  Env Microbiol. 1998;64(12):4870-6.
  8. Fomsgaard A, Christiansen CB, Bødker R. First identification of tick-borne encephalitis in Denmark outside of Bornholm, August 2011. Euro Surveill. 2009;14(36):pii=19325. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19325
  9. Kawahara M, Rikihisa Y, Isogai E, Takahashi M, Misumi H, Suto C, et al. Ultrastructure and phylogenetic analysis of 'Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis' in the family Anaplasmataceae, isolated from wild rats and found in Ixodes ovatus ticks.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(Pt5):1837-43.
  10. Dumbler JS, Madigan JE, Pusterla N, Bakken JS. Ehrlichioses in Humans: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis and Treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45 Suppl 1:S45-51.
  11. Andersson M, Råberg L. Wild rodents and novel human pathogen candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Southern Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(9):1716-8.
  12. van Overbeek L, Gassner F, van der Plas CL, Kastelein P, Nunes-da Rocha U, Takken W. Diversity of Ixodes ricinus tick-associated bacterial communities from different forests. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;66(1):72-84.
  13. Schouls LM, van dP, I, Rijpkema SG, Schot CS. Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(7):2215-22.
  14. Richter D, Matuschka FR. “Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis”, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Lyme disease spirochetes in questing European vector ticks and in feeding ticks removed from people. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):943-7.
  15. Alekseev AN, Dubinina HV, van dP, I, Schouls LM. Identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ticks in the Baltic regions of Russia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2237-42.
  16. Lundkvist A, Wallensten A, Vene S, Hjertqvist M. Tick-borne encephalitis increasing in Sweden, 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(39):pii=19981. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19981
  17. Randolph SE, The shifting landscape of tick-borne zoonoses: tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356(1411):1045-56.


Back to Table of Contents
Previous Download (pdf) Next

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2013. All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.