On 6 June 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published updates to its ‘Essential Medicines List’ (EML). Read more here.

Eurosurveillance is on the updated list of the Directory of Open Access Journals and in the SHERPA/RoMEO database. Read more here.

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc

In this issue

Home Eurosurveillance Monthly Release  1997: Volume 2/ Issue 8 Article 1
Back to Table of Contents
en es fr pt

Eurosurveillance, Volume 2, Issue 8, 01 August 1997
Research Articles
Diphtheria in the 1990s - do we have all the answers?

Citation style for this article: Editorial Committee. Diphtheria in the 1990s - do we have all the answers?. Euro Surveill. 1997;2(8):pii=202. Available online:

The recent epidemic of diphtheria in the former Soviet Union has been a major threat to countries in western Europe, where levels of diphtheria anti-toxin in adults are less than optimal. The total number of cases in western Europe linked to countries further east have been smaller than might have been expected (see Editorial note page 63). The discussion paper by Galazka and Thomaszunas - Blaszczyk on the reasons why adults contract diphtheria (pages 60) reminds modern readers that much can be learned about current diphtheria problems through a detailed analysis of past epidemics.

The contrast in diphtheria incidence between western and eastern Europe raises many questions. Why has the resurgence in cases in the Newly Independent States been predominantly in adults if the profound decrease in immunisation levels mainly affected children? What special conditions contributed to the increased vulnerability of the adult population in Russia? Does prevention depend upon frequent boosting immunisations for adults? If the answer is yes, then why hasn't an epidemic occurred in western Europe? Are the results of contemporary serological surveys comparable internationally? Opportunities for diphtheria transmission must have increased in the east due to declining social conditions and population migration, but why this should have exploited waning adult immunity so rapidly is unclear. Has a change in antibiotic usage as a secondary effect of economic transition allowed diphtheria to flourish?

This issue of Eurosurveillance does not provide the answers but it does illustrate the marked geographic and historical differences in diphtheria incidence which exist within Europe. Further comparative studies may reveal more satisfactory answers which could ultimately lead to more effective prevention.

Back to Table of Contents
en es fr pt

The publisher’s policy on data collection and use of cookies.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal. The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement. Except where otherwise stated, all manuscripts published after 1 January 2016 will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. You are free to share and adapt the material, but you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2016. All rights reserved

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.