Eurosurveillance banner




Announcements
Read our articles on the ongoing Ebola outbreak in West Africa

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2012: Volume 17/ Issue 33 Article 1 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf) Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 17, Issue 33, 16 August 2012
Surveillance and outbreak reports
Carbapenem non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae from Micronet network hospitals, Italy, 2009 to 2012
  1. CINECA – Consortium of universities, Bologna, Italy
  2. Istituto Superiore Sanità (Italian National Public Health Institute), Rome, Italy
  3. Azienda Complessa Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy
  4. University of Sienna, Department of Biotechnologies, Section of Microbiology, and Microbiology and Virology Unit, Sienna University Hospital, Sienna, Italy
  5. Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
  6. Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista ‘Le Molinette’, Turin, Italy
  7. The participants are listed at the end of the article

Citation style for this article: Sisto A, D'Ancona F, Meledandri M, Pantosti A, Rossolini GM, Raglio A, Serra R, Dematte L, Aiello E, Goglio A, Micronet network participants. Carbapenem non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae from Micronet network hospitals, Italy, 2009 to 2012. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(33):pii=20247. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20247
Date of submission: 17 January 2012

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae has recently been reported as a new, multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen in several hospitals from various Italian regions. Through Micronet, a new Italian sentinel laboratory-based surveillance network, we studied the trend of non-susceptibility of K. pneumoniae to selected carbapenems (imipenem and/or meropenem) in 14 of the 15 hospitals participating in the network. Analysis of data from 1 January 2009 to 30 April 2012 revealed a statistically significant increasing trend (p<0.01) in the proportion of carbapenem non-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolates from clinical specimens (from 2.2 % in 2009 to 19.4% in 2012). The increase in the proportion of non-susceptibility was very large for isolates from the respiratory tract (from 5.3% in 2009 to 38.5% in 2012) and blood (from 5.4% in 2009 to 29.2% in 2012). The results demonstrate the urgent need in Italy for infection control, guidelines, antibiotic stewardship programmes and utilisation of surveillance systems, such as Micronet, which are capable of receiving data from hospitals in real time for many pathogens and types of clinical specimens.


Background

 

In recent years, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae have emerged rapidly in hospitals worldwide [1]. Two main mechanisms can lead to reduced susceptibility or resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae, namely reduced outer-membrane permeability associated with the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC-type beta-lactamases [2,3] and production of acquired beta-lactamases that degrade carbapenems (carbapenemases) [4,5]. The most frequent carbapenemases spreading among Enterobacteriaceae currently are the following: the KPC-type serine carbapenemases (belonging to Ambler’s molecular class A); the VIM- and NDM-type metallo-beta-lactamases (belonging to Ambler’s molecular class B); and the OXA-48-like serine carbapenemases (belonging to Ambler’s molecular class D) [6-9]. The species most commonly affected is Klebsiella pneumoniae [10-13]. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) usually carry additional resistance determinants to other antimicrobial agents, making these strains resistant to many antibiotics [5] and thus leaving few therapeutic options for infected patients.

In Italy, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae has recently been reported as a new, multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen in hospitals from different Italian regions [14-21]. The circulation of such strains in healthcare facilities, however, needs to be clearly measured, since an increased circulation of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has important implications for both the control of both patient-to-patient transmission and hospital-to-hospital transfer of patients [22].

The purpose of this study is to assess the trend in the proportion of K. pneumoniae isolates non-susceptible to selected carbapenems from 2009 to 2012, in a sample of Italian hospitals belonging to Micronet. Micronet is a sentinel laboratory epidemiological surveillance network for infections, which has been established in Italy since 2008. It was created and is managed by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, the Italian National Public Health Institute, and CINECA (a supercomputing centre and consortium of Italian universities). It is based on computerised daily collection of data on microbial isolates and of related antibiotic susceptibilities from the laboratory information systems of 27 laboratories nationwide.

Methods

Inclusion criteria
We collected data on K. pneumoniae isolates non-susceptible to selected carbapenems (imipenem and/or meropenem) from relevant clinical specimens (bronchoalveolar lavages, tracheal aspirates, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, pus, urine) from 1 January 2009 to 30 April 2012 for 14 of the 15 hospitals in which the Micronet interface is fully active and functioning automatically (one hospital was excluded since it had no data for 2009). These are medium or large referral hospitals, located in four Italian regions. Since 2011, they have become part of ARISS, the Italian antimicrobial resistance surveillance system that sends data to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net), coordinated by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

Micronet database
Data on K. pneumoniae isolates for which antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were available were extracted from the Micronet database, in which the results were described qualitatively (susceptible, intermediate, resistant). For the purposes of this study, isolates with intermediate and resistant profiles were defined as non-susceptible. We focused on the following subset of isolates (the data were obtained from the main dataset): isolates of K. pneumoniae from all major clinical specimens (blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, tracheal aspirate, cerebrospinal fluid, pus, urine) for which there were antimicrobial susceptibility test data available for the selected carbapenems (imipenem and/or meropenem). Information on susceptibility to ertapenem was not available for many of the participating laboratories for the entire period and was therefore not considered in our analysis.

For patients from whom several isolates had been obtained in the same month, only the first isolate was considered, regardless of the type of clinical specimen from which it was isolated and regardless the result. Multiple isolates from the same patient collected after an interval of 30 days were included. In such instances, we counted only the first isolate of K. pneumoniae for which susceptibility to the selected carbapenems was tested, regardless of the result.

An export procedure for the results of microbiological tests (both positive and negative) was developed in each participating laboratory, with the contribution of laboratory information systems managers and clinical microbiologists. Only results validated in the laboratory and used for clinical purposes are sent to a central server located and managed at CINECA, where the data are consolidated. We also used the Micronet database for an analysis stratified by type of clinical specimen.

Additional data
The participating laboratories were also asked to provide full information on the methods used to identify the organisms (i.e. which automated system for identification was used) as well as which guidelines were used to interpret the results of the antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Furthermore, the laboratories were asked to provide the number of beds and the number of patient days of their respective referral hospitals for January–December 2011, the most recent data available in all the hospitals.

Data analysis
The proportion of carbapenem non-susceptibility was calculated as the number of carbapenem non-susceptible first isolates of K. pneumoniae divided by the total number of first isolates of K. pneumoniae, expressed as percentage. As not all participating laboratories had information on the age of the patients, age was not included in our analysis.

Epi-Info 3.53 [23] was used to calculate the proportion of isolates that were non-susceptible. OpenEpi 2.3.1 [24] was used to calculate confidence intervals for the proportion (using Fisher’s exact test) and also for the extended Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test for linear trend.

Results

The mean number of beds of the 14 Micronet hospitals in the study was 631 (median: 516.5; range: 322–1,220). The mean number of patient days was 183,388 (median: 155,084 (range: 84,360–372,646).

Analysis of data from 1 January 2009 to 30 April 2012 from the 14 laboratories revealed a statistically significant increasing trend (p<0.01) in the proportion of K. pneumoniae isolates from clinical specimens that were non-susceptible to the selected carbapenems (Table 1). The percentage of non-susceptibility was higher for isolates from the respiratory tract, pus and blood.

Table 1. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates tested for susceptibility to imipenem and/or meropenem, by type of clinical specimen, 14 Micronet hospitals, Italy, 1 January 2009–30 April 2012 (n=11,353)

 

The percentage of K. pneumoniae isolates non-susceptible to imipenem and/or meropenem was higher overall in isolates taken from patients in intensive care units and in medicine departments (Table2).

Table 2. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates tested for susceptibility to imipenem and/or meropenem, by type of hospital department from which specimens were obtained, 14 Micronet hospitals, Italy, 1 January 2009–30 April 2012 (n=11,301)a


 

Table 3 shows remarkable differences in the percentage of isolates non-susceptible to imipenem and/or meropenem among the 14 laboratories during the study period.

Table 3. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates tested for susceptibility to imipenem and/or meropenem, by laboratory, 14 Micronet hospitals, Italy 1 January, 2009–30 April 2012 (n=11,353)




The automated systems used for susceptibility testing and the guidelines adopted by each laboratory are shown in Table 4. Until 2010, all laboratories had adopted the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive criteria [25]. Before 2012, 13 of them moved to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) system [26] (Table 4).

Table 4. Guidelines and automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing used by laboratories in the 14 Micronet hospitals, Italy, 1 January, 2009–30 April 2012


 

Discussion

In recent years, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae has become a very important worldwide public health threat as a multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen [22]. Borer et al. have shown that the crude and attributable mortality rates (71.9% and 50%, respectively) associated with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteraemia were striking. More than 65% of patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bacteraemia developed severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome and septic shock [27,28]. High rates of carbapenem non-susceptible K. pneumoniae have been seen in Greece since the early 2000s and in Cyprus since 2008, and a rapid increase has also been observed in Italy and Hungary since 2010 [29,30].

Experiences in single hospitals or entire countries have shown how the spread of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae can be controlled by aggressive interventions of infection control, based on early identification of clinical infections and of colonised patients, to enforce in a timely manner stringent practices for the containment of the spread (isolation, hand hygiene, environmental cleaning and decontamination, etc.) [28]. Many institutions, including the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United Kingdom Health Protection Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, have developed guidance to counter the spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, emphasising the importance of a prompt and effective response before the spread has reached such an extent that it cannot be controlled [6,22,29,31]. In Italy, there are no national guidelines for infection control, although at the local level, many hospitals have adopted guidelines and antibiotic stewardship programmes [32].

Data presented in this article from the Micronet network in Italy confirmed the notable increasing trend of non-susceptibility of K. pneumoniae to carbapenems since 2010, and revealed that the proportion that is non-susceptible has continued to increase in 2012. The proportions reported here are somewhat higher than those reported by EARS-NET for 2010 [30]: this could be explained by the large variability in the proportion of non-susceptible isolates among the laboratories and differences between the laboratories participating in the two networks. In fact, the percentage of K. pneumoniae non-susceptibility to carbapenems observed in 2010 by the Micronet network (Table 1) was highly affected by Laboratory D (Table 3); by eliminating data from that laboratory, the proportion of carbapenem non-susceptible K. pneumoniae isolates from blood observed in 2010 decreased from 22.6% to 10.5%. In 2011, however, data from Laboratory D had a lower impact due to the decreased proportion observed in that laboratory and to the increased proportions observed in the others: including data from Laboratory D, the proportions of non-susceptible isolates from all clinical specimens or blood were 16.7% or 32.6%, respectively, while, when data from this laboratory were not included, the proportions were 14.8% or 29.3%, respectively. These results underscore the possible impact of a large outbreak in a single hospital when aggregated or cumulative data are analysed.

The considerable heterogeneity observed in the proportion of carbapenem non-susceptible isolates in the different laboratories (Table 3) probably reflects the activities and organisation of the referral hospitals, their capacity for infection control and the geographical location of the hospital. For instance, Laboratory B, which reported 66.7% carbapenem non-susceptibility in 2012, is a multispecialised tertiary-level hospital with a transplant centre, which receives patients from other neighbouring hospitals or from other national hospitals. Differences in the use of various antibiotics/antibiotic classes in the hospitals could also be an important factor, as has been shown elsewhere in the scientific literature [33].

The higher proportion of non-susceptibility observed in isolates from respiratory samples, pus and blood versus those from urine might reflect, at least in part, the outpatient origin of the urinary isolates, with outpatients being less exposed to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae circulating in the hospital environment. The Micronet system is able to differentiate between hospital departments but is unable to discriminate between samples from outpatients and inpatients. A system update will enable samples from inpatients and outpatients to be distinguished. It also expected that patient characteristics, such as age, will be retrievable.

Changes in clinical breakpoints may also have influenced the proportion of isolates that were non-susceptible. The CLSI (formerly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) in the United States modified its clinical breakpoints for carbapenems after an expert consultation in January 2010 [25]. They reduced the value of clinical breakpoints defined by minimum inhibitory concentrations for imipenem and meropenem from ≤4 to ≤1 mg/L for the category susceptible and from ≥16 to ≥4 mg/L for the category resistant. These thresholds were amended to better identify the carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. The updated CLSI breakpoints came into use in June 2010. The clinical breakpoints adopted by EUCAST [26] in 2008 set their breakpoints for clinical purposes and not for optimal detection of carbapenemase production (they are one-dilution step higher than the modified CLSI value). Therefore some of the differences in the proportion of non-susceptible isolates could be a consequence of the changes in breakpoints [29].

The spread of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and in particular of KPC-producing strains, is worrying from a public health point of view, since such strains are likely to be the source of many hospital-acquired infections in severely ill patients [5]. In addition, it is well known for its ability to accumulate and transfer resistance determinants, as illustrated with ESBLs [34]. Multidrug-resistant and pandrug-resistant KPC-producing bacteria may be the source of therapeutic failures, since novel anti-Gram-negative molecules are not expected in the near future [13]. For such reasons, there is an urgent need for infection control, antibiotic stewardship programmes and specific guidelines on strategies for screening for carriers.

In light of this analysis, we consider the development and use of networks, such as Micronet, in public health to be particularly important. Micronet is capable of receiving data from hospitals, collecting them in real time and detecting the emergence of these pathogens, which are particularly difficult to treat clinically and important to public health [29]. To strengthen the capacity of Micronet, in 2012, the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing are being collected both quantitatively and qualitatively. Data are collected from the laboratory daily, from all types of clinical specimens. For such reasons, the network enables real-time monitoring of new microbiological alerts in multiple settings [35].

Micronet network participants, Italy
L. Bertinotti, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, Legnano; E. Bordi, INMI ‘Lazzaro Spallanzani’ IRCCS,  Rome; P. Casella, Ao Ospedale Civile di Vimercate; M.G. Chirillo, Aso S. Luigi, Orbassano; P. Cichero, Ospedale S. Raffaele,  Milan; P. Clerici, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, Legnano; S. Cuccurullo, Ospedale Monaldi, Naples; A. De Bernochi , Asl 4 Osp. San Giovanni Bosco, Turiny; G. De Intinis, OIRM S. Anna, Turin; P. A. Dusi, Asl 1 Ospedale di Sanremo, Sanremo; P. Lanzafame, Ospedale S. Chiara, Trento; L Lodolo, Asl 14 Ospedale di Verbania, Verbania; F. Milano, Asl 11 Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli; G. Monticone, Asl 19 Ospedali Riuniti di Asti, Asti; D. Morelli, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan; M. Mori, Ospedale Galliera, Genoa; R. Provenzani, Aso Villa Sofia di Palermo, Palermo; A. Restelli, Fondazione Policlinico Milano, Milan; A. Rocchetti , ASO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria; P. Sansone, Ospedale Galliera, Genoa; M. Tronci, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome.

Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Gianluca Maggio Cavallaro for his continuous support in the analysis of the database.


References
  1. Gupta N, Limbago BM, Patel JB, Kallen AJ. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(1):60-7.
  2. Ardanuy C, Liñares J, Domínguez MA, Hernández-Allés S, Benedí VJ, Martínez-Martínez L. Outer membrane profiles of clonally related Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from clinical samples and activities of cephalosporins and carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(7):1636-40.
  3. Martínez-Martínez L, Pascual A, Hernández-Allés S, Alvarez-Díaz D, Suárez AI, Tran J, et al. Roles of beta-lactamases and porins in activities of carbapenems and cephalosporins against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(7):1669-73.
  4. Nordmann P, Poirel L. Emerging carbapenemases in Gram-negative aerobes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8(6):321-31.
  5. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(3):440-58.
  6. Livermore D. Advice on carbapenemase producers: recognition, infection control and treatment. London: Health Protection Agency; 2011. [Accessed 25 May 2012]. Available from:
     http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1294740725984
  7. Walther-Rasmussen J, Høiby N. Class A carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(3):470-82.
  8. Bebrone C. Metallo-beta-lactamases (classification, activity, genetic organization, structure, zinc coordination) and their superfamily. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;74(12):1686-701.
  9. Kim Y, Tesar C, Mire J, Jedrzejczak R, Binkowski A, Babnigg G, et al. Structure of apo- and monometalated forms of NDM-1--a highly potent carbapenem-hydrolyzing metallo-β-lactamase. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24621.
  10. Bradford PA, Bratu S, Urban C, Visalli M, Mariano N, Landman D, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella species possessing the class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing KPC-2 and inhibitor-resistant TEM-30 beta-lactamases in New York City. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):55-60.
  11. Naas T, Cuzon G, Villegas MV, Lartigue MF, Quinn JP, Nordmann P. Genetic structures at the origin of acquisition of the beta-lactamase bla KPC gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(4):1257-63.
  12. Kitchel B, Sundin DR, Patel JB. Regional dissemination of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(10):4511-3.
  13. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(4):228-36.
  14. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268-81.
  15. Gaibani P, Ambretti S, Berlingeri A, Gelsomino F, Bielli A, Landini MP, et al. Rapid increase of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains in a large Italian hospital: surveillance period 1 March - 30 September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(8):pii=19800. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19800
  16. Giani T, D'Andrea MM, Pecile P, Borgianni L, Nicoletti P, Tonelli F, et al. Emergence in Italy of Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258 producing KPC-3 carbapenemase. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(11):3793-4.
  17. Fontana C, Favaro M, Sarmati L, Natoli S, Altieri A, Bossa MC, et al. Emergence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Italy. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:40.
  18. Agodi A, Voulgari E, Barchitta M, Politi L, Koumaki V, Spanakis N, et al. Containment of an outbreak of KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(11):3986-9.
  19. Di Carlo P, Pantuso G, Cusimano A, D'Arpa F, Giammanco A, Gulotta G, et al. Two cases of monomicrobial intraabdominal abscesses due to KPC--3 Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 clone. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:103.
  20. Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Caio C, Petrolito V, Sciortino D, Sciacca A, et al. Outbreak of KPC-3-producing, and colistin-resistant, Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in two Sicilian hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(9):1444-7.
  21. Gaibani P, Ambretti S, Berlingeri A, Cordovana M, Farruggia P, Panico M, et al. Outbreak of NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae in northern Italy, July to August 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(47):pii=20027. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20027
  22. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Risk assessment on the spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) through patient transfer between healthcare facilities, with special emphasis on cross-border transfer. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011. Available from:  http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/110913_Risk_assessment_resistant_CPE.pdf
  23. [23] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Epi Info 3.5.3. Atlanta: GA: CDC.  [Accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/html/downloads.htm
  24. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: open source epidemiologic statistics for public health, version 2.3.1. Updated 6 Jun 2011, [Accessed 9 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.OpenEpi.com
  25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement (M100-S20-U). June 2010 update. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2011.
  26.  European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 2.0, valid from 1 Jan 2012. EUCAST. [Accessed 12 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/Breakpoint_table_v_2.0_120221.pdf
  27. Borer A, Saidel-Odes L, Riesenberg K, Eskira S, Peled N, Nativ R, et al. Attributable mortality rate for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(10):972-6.
  28. Schwaber MJ, Lev B, Israeli A, Solter E, Smollan G, Rubinovitch B, et al. Containment of a country-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Israeli hospitals via a nationally implemented intervention. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(7):848-55.
  29. Grundmann H, Livermore DM, Giske CG, Canton R, Rossolini GM, Campos J, et al. Carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: conclusions from a meeting of national experts. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(46):pii=19711. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19711
  30. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2010. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Stockholm: ECDC; 2011. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1111_SUR_AMR_data.pdf.pdf
  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidance for control of infections with carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in acute care facilities. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(10):256-60.
  32. Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale - Regione Emilia Romagna. Indicazioni pratiche e protocolli operativi per la diagnosi,la sorveglianza e il controllo degli enterobatteri produttori di carbapenemasi nelle strutture sanitarie e socio-sanitarie. [Practical indication and operative protocols for diagnosis, surveillance, and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare facilities]. Bologna: Regione Emilia Romagna; July 2012. Italian. Available from: http://asr.regione.emilia-romagna.it/wcm/asr/aree_di_programma/rischioinfettivo/gr_ric/pr_antibres/pubblicazioni/carbapenemasi_generale/link/carbapenemasi-generale.pdf
  33. Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):417-33.
  34. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657-86.
  35. D'Ancona F, Sisto A, Raglio A, Meledandri M, Rocchetti A, Micronet Network Participants. Acinetobacter baumannii in Italian hospitals: results from a retrospective data analysis from the Micronet Network laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(S108-S668). [Accessed 12 Aug 2012]. Available from: http://registration.akm.ch/einsicht.php?XNABSTRACT_ID=128120&XNSPRACHE_ID=2&XNKONGRESS_ID=136&XNMASKEN_ID=900


Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf) Next

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2013. All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.