Eurosurveillance banner




Announcements
Read our articles on the ongoing Ebola outbreak in West Africa

Follow Eurosurveillance on Twitter: @Eurosurveillanc


In this issue


Home Eurosurveillance Edition  2013: Volume 18/ Issue 11 Article 1 Printer friendly version
Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf) Next

Eurosurveillance, Volume 18, Issue 11, 14 March 2013
Editorials
From national to international – challenges in cross-border multi-country, multi-vehicle foodborne outbreak investigations
  1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden

Citation style for this article: Coulombier D, Takkinen J. From national to international – challenges in cross-border multi-country, multi-vehicle foodborne outbreak investigations. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(11):pii=20423. Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20423
Date of submission: 12 March 2013

This issue of Eurosurveillance features two articles by Horvath et al. and Scavia et al. reporting the findings of the investigations of an unusual increase in Salmonella Goldcoast infections in Hungary and Italy respectively, in 2009 [1,2]. The increase in notified cases started around June and July in both countries. While the magnitude remained limited, it persisted over a period of several weeks and therefore, in early October, Hungary reported this increase to the European Epidemic Intelligence Information System for food- and waterborne diseases in the European Union (EU) [3], to check if other EU/European Economic Area (EEA) Member States had experienced a similar increase. In response to this, within four weeks, five countries: Denmark, Italy, Norway, Spain, and United Kingdom, reported recently diagnosed laboratory-confirmed S. Goldcoast cases possibly linked to the cases in Hungary [4].

S. Goldcoast is a rare serovar, with between 150 and 200 cases reported annually in the EU/EEA from 2007 to 2010, excluding 2009 (unpublished data). In 2009, 314 cases were reported, representing a significant increase compared to the background level in the years 2007 to 2010.

The investigations reported in this issue concluded that a contamination of meat had probably occurred along the pork production chain, had persisted over several months and resulted in multiple vehicles derived from the pork production chain causing an unusually high number of sporadic and clustered cases.

The two articles highlight challenges in the investigation of potential cross-border multi-country outbreaks where multiple contaminated vehicles originating from the similar type of food production chain may serve as a source of infection of sporadic cases and may cause point source outbreaks at local, regional or national level. Firstly, such outbreaks do not usually result in a large number of cases accumulated over a limited time period and associated with a single vehicle. Therefore, the delay in the recognition of a potential common origin impairs the ability to investigate timely and precisely the food items consumed during the incubation period of the cases. Secondly, as the contamination may involve several products, pork meat containing products in the outbreaks described in this issue of Eurosurveillance, epidemiological investigations may remain inconclusive. In such instances investigating household outbreaks can be of high value. Even though often small and limited, household outbreaks may reveal a common exposure to pork meat or a single vehicle in a family cluster and family clusters may indicate the presence of contaminated raw food of animal origin on the retail market. It is noteworthy that both outbreaks described reported the involvement of homemade products from pork meat. Households have been reported as the most important setting for Salmonella outbreaks; 55.6% of notified Salmonella foodborne outbreaks with strong evidence (n=341) occurred in single households in 2010 [5].

The high similarity of the molecular typing results from samples of animal, food and human origin in the Italian investigation further strengthened the evidence supporting the origin of the contamination in the pork production chain. The high genetic homology based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis between the Hungarian and Italian outbreak profiles allowed linking the increase in the number of cases in the two countries to a probable common source of contamination. In addition, the simultaneous occurrence of the increase as well as the strong suspicion of pork containing products as a source of infection in both countries, further strengthened this hypothesis. The timely epidemiological and microbiological investigation along the food chain was however not possible and was largely hampered by the difficulty in tracing back the meat used in salami production.

The two S. Goldcoast outbreaks stress the importance of collaboration between public health and veterinary authorities and the need to share samples and data from human, animal, food and feed across sectors when investigating such complex outbreaks. In addition, it is crucial to ensure the comparability of molecular typing methods used in both sectors so that a microbiological link between human and food/animal samples, which should be confirmed through an epidemiological link, can be ascertained in a timely manner. The limitations of the epidemiological investigation in a context of sporadic cases and small clusters prevent establishing firm evidence of an association with a particular vehicle. In such situations, the concordance of molecular and epidemiological evidence pointing towards a source of contamination is crucial.

Similarly, linking cases and clusters that occur at the same time in several countries allows the coordination of investigations through the use of standard questionnaires adapted to cultural differences and the sharing of results. This in turn may increase the statistical power of the investigation by enrolling more cases in the analytical studies. However, the sharing of information among countries only after an alert from a single country, does not allow for early recognition of a similar pattern occurring simultaneously in several Member States. This is why the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has started, together with EU/EEA countries, a pilot project for molecular-typing-based surveillance. The aim of this project is to enable immediate sharing of molecular typing information for Salmonella serovars, Shiga toxin/verocytotoxin –producing Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes to allow early recognition of such patterns through regular analysis of molecular typing profiles [6]. This will ensure that even small multi-country outbreaks will be recognised early on in the future, and permit timely investigation of potential sources and vehicles of infection and implementation of control measures. The establishment of similar type data collection in the food sector will further enhance the possibilities to timely control the spread of foodborne pathogens.



Conflict of interest
None declared.



References

  1. Horváth JK, Mengel M, Krisztalovics K, Nogrady N, Pászti J, Lenglet A, et al. Investigation into an unusual increase of human cases of Salmonella Goldcoast infection in Hungary in 2009 . Euro Surveill. 2013;18(11):pii=20422. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20422
    PMid:23399425  
  2. Scavia G, Ciaravino G, Luzzi I, Lenglet A, Ricci A, Barco L, et al. A multistate epidemic outbreak of Salmonella Goldcoast infection in humans, June 2009 to March 2010: the investigation in Italy. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(11):pii=20424. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20424
  3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Epidemic Intelligence Information System (EPIS) for food- and water borne diseases in the European Union. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed 12 Mar 2013]. Available from: http://external.ecdc.europa.eu/EPIS_FWD/
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Surveillance Report. Annual Threat Report 2009. Stockholm: ECDC. 2010. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/101004_SUR_Annual_Threat_Report_2009.pdf
  5. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2597. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2597. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2597.pdf
  6. van Walle I. ECDC starts pilot phase for collection of molecular typing data. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(3):pii=20357. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20357
    PMid:23351656 


Back to Table of Contents
Download (pdf) Next

Disclaimer:The opinions expressed by authors contributing to Eurosurveillance do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) or the editorial team or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Neither ECDC nor any person acting on behalf of ECDC is responsible for the use that might be made of the information in this journal.
The information provided on the Eurosurveillance site is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Our website does not host any form of commercial advertisement.

Eurosurveillance [ISSN] - ©2007-2013. All rights reserved
 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.