| Introduction
Over one thousand species of bats are known worldwide. In recent years,
evidence has suggested that they are like most animals reservoirs or
biological and accidental vectors for different kinds of micro-organisms
including lyssaviruses, West Nile virus, Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis
virus, Hendra virus, Menangle virus, And Histoplasma capsulatum [1,2].
Nipah, Menangle and Hendra viruses have all been isolated from bats.
Rabies is a notifiable disease in European countries both within and
outside the European Union.
Bat rabies has been laboratory confirmed in different parts of the
world, and is a public health concern [3]. Much literature has been
published on this subject, mostly in the Americas. In Europe, over
30 species of bats have been recognised [4]. All are protected under
the Agreement on the Conservation of Population of European bats [5].
It has been demonstrated that some but not all bat species carry the
viruses. EBLVs are host-specific to specific bat species. Although
the common serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus) is mainly affected
by EBLV1, different mouse-eared bats (Myotis spp.) are more
affected by EBLV2.
Most human cases worldwide result from a dog bite or other contact
with terrestrial mammals. Bat rabies in humans in Europe is very rare,
but in some other parts of the world e.g. USA and Brazil is more frequently
recognized. Bat bites may go unrecognised, while bites from terrestrial
carnivores are usually noticed. Large outbreaks of bat rabies have
been observed in South America in humans and in livestock, associated
with bites of the vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus), a species only seen
in Central and South America [6].
The Lyssavirus genus, within the Rhabdoviridae family,
is subdivided into seven genotypes based on RNA sequencing [7-9]:
• genotype 1 - classical rabies virus, worldwide
• genotype 2 - Lagos bat virus, Africa
• genotype 3 - Mokola virus, Africa
• genotype 4 - Duvenhage virus, Africa
• genotype 5 - European bat lyssavirus 1 (EBLV-1), Europe
• genotype 6 - European bat lyssavirus 2 (EBLV-2), Europe
• genotype 7 - Australian bat lyssavirus, Australia.
Rabies in bats in Europe are caused by two independent lyssavirus
infections, distinct from rabies infections in foxes, dogs, cats, cattle
and other terrestrial animals. Classic rabies virus strains associated
with terrestrial animals are from genotype 1.
This paper deals with bat rabies across Europe, and rabies pre-exposure
vaccination and post-exposure treatment in humans.
Lyssaviruses and rabies in European bat species
In Europe, bats are infected by two different lyssavirus genotypes, genotype
5 (EBLV-type 1) and genotype 6 (EBLV type-2). Both are related to the
classical rabies virus, although EBLV2 is closer to genotype 1 than
EBLV1 [3,10]. EBLV-1 and EBLV-2 have been subdivided into two phylogenetic
lineages, EBLV-1a and EBLV-1b and EBLV-2a and EBLV-2b.
A different bat lyssavirus, named Aravan was recently isolated from
a lesser mouse-eared bat, Myotis blythii [11] and a new lyssavirus,
West Caucasian bat virus, was isolated in Miniopterus schreibersii in
2002 [12]. Their position within Lyssavirus genus is still
being studied. Modern methods based on phylogenetic relationships were
used, comparing nucleotide sequences of the nucleoprotein gene and
the amino acid sequence to find the phylogenetic tree showing genetic
relationships between different lyssaviruses.
Infection with EBLV has occurred in Europe in several bat species
[13-16]. Rabies in bats has been reported from the Netherlands, Germany,
France, Spain, Switzerland, Hungary, Poland, Denmark, Lithuania, the
Russian Federation, Ukraine, Slovakia, Finland, and the United Kingdom.
In France, 14 cases of bats rabies caused by EBLV-1 have been diagnosed
from 1989 to 2002, all in serotine bats (Eptesicus serotinus)
[13]. EBLV-1a strains have been distributed in northeastern France
and EBLV-1b strains in the northwest. European bat lyssavirus type
1, EBLV-1 (genotype 5), is enzootic in the insectivorous bat populations
in Germany. In 2001, a single stone marten (Martes foina)
was infected with EBLV-1a [16]. No clinical signs were observed as
the animal was found dead. EBLV-1 has been identified in Spain17].
The results came from serology and RT-PCR. EBLV-2a has been isolated
in the United Kingdom [14]. The geographic distribution of infected
bat species across other European countries according to laboratory
determined genotypes of lyssaviruses has been described by different
authors [18-21]. EBLV-1 has been found in E. serotinus in
Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland, and Switzerland.
Host restriction of EBLV
Bats are the primary reservoir of EBLV viruses, but natural infections
have occurred in at least three other species. In very rare circumstances,
infections with the same lyssaviruses have been identified in a stone
marten (1 case), sheep (2 cases) and humans [22]. To date, only three
cases of rabies in humans have been reported and confirmed: one case
was infected with EBLV-1 and two with EBLV-2 [14] [TABLE 1].

Protection of humans
According to recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO)
and other institutions [3,21,23], post-exposure treatment after a bat
bite is advised. Anyone exposed to bats should be vaccinated preventively
against rabies. Post-exposure vaccination and treatment are recommended
after a bite or after exposure to bats [TABLES 2 and 3].


Humans bitten by a bat suspected to be infected with lyssavirus receive
post-exposure prophylaxis. In previously unvaccinated persons this
consists of an immediate injection of vaccine (days 0, 3, 7, 14, and
28) with additional anti-rabies immunoglobulin (20 IU/kg of body weight).
Unvaccinated persons should receive an immediate dose of rabies immunoglobulin
and the first dose of vaccine, and then complete the series by receiving
four additional doses of vaccine on days 3, 7, 14, and 28 after the
first dose. Commercially available rabies vaccines are prepared in
cell cultures from the inactivated classical rabies virus, i.e. genotype
1. In central Europe, post-exposure treatment is usually given on days
0,7 and 21; two doses are given on day 0 in the deltoids of both arms
and additional doses are given on days 7 and 21. This is one of the
WHO validated vaccination schedule [24]. In the United Kingdom, pre-exposure
vaccination of all bat handlers, as well as post-exposure vaccination
of anyone bitten or in other close contacts with bats, are recommended
[24].
Some European countries already have immunisation programmes against
bat rabies to protect bat handlers, as well as the general population.
Pre-exposure vaccination consists of four doses of modern rabies vaccines
given at 0, 7 and 21 days [24,25]. Post-exposure prophylaxis should
always be considered, no matter how trivial seeming the exposure.
Current tissue cell rabies vaccines and specific immunoglobulins are
used against all genotypes of lyssavirus genus. Rabies researchers
generally agree that current vaccines confer a protective immune response
against different genotypes of lyssaviruses, with the notable exception
of West Caucasian bat virus. Antibody response of >= 0.5 IU/ml in
sera, measuring neutralising antibodies of vaccinated subjects, is
admitted as a sufficient antibody level for protection [25].
Underreporting of cases?
European bat lyssaviruses are recognised in Europe in a limited number
of countries, and in under one third of native bat species. In many
countries, there is no research, monitoring or surveillance in this
field. Data is limited to accurately mapping the geographical distribution
of lyssaviruses in the different bat species across Europe. Over the
past fifty years, only about 800 cases of rabid bats have been notified
in Europe, and more than 90% of these were in the Netherlands, Denmark,
Germany, Poland, Spain and France. Serological examination of carriers
of lyssaviruses in living bat populations is interesting for bat researchers
and public heath officers. Bats may be seropositive for antibodies
against lyssaviruses and yet not be carriers of the virus. Further
research on EBLV viruses occurring in bat infections and different
animal species across Europe will be welcomed. At the same time laboratory
confirmation of viral encephalitis in humans in Europe should include
examination on lyssaviruses to find out the real risk for domestic
human rabies infections. Underreporting of viral encephalitis cases
and reporting without the association of an aetiological agent for
the disease is well known [26].
Infection with EBLV has been naturally identified in only two other
species apart from bats and humans; stone marten and sheep. Most recently
Vos et al. [27] reported successful laboratory induced infections of
ferrets and mice by EBLV-1 and EBLV-2.
According to the results of studies performed on different bat species
in Europe, laboratory testing on the European bat lyssavirus 1 (EBLV-1)
was positive in Tadarida teniotis, Myotis myotis (EBLV-1b), Myotis
nattereri (EBLV-1b), Pipistrellus nathusii, Vespertilio murinus (EBLV-1a), Nyctalus
noctula, Miniopterus schreibersii (EBLV-1b) and Rhinolophus
ferrumequinum (EBLV-1b). However, no virus strain was isolated
in this study, and only positive serology and PCR tests were obtained.
Infection is not usually lethal for bats [28].
Successful treatment
Rabies pre-exposure vaccination and post-exposure treatment with modern
rabies vaccines is safe and protective and should be extended. Although
vaccination schedules are well adapted for genotype 1 classical rabies
virus, this is not the case for the other genotypes. Despite a lack
of evidence, vaccination schedules are still strongly recommended for
the other lyssavirus genotypes. In persons occupationally exposed to
bats, pre-exposure vaccination is necessary, but for the general population,
only post-exposure treatments after bat bites is recommended. Different
schedules with different modern generations of rabies cell culture
vaccines are approved in Europe, most of all prepared on human diploid
cell (HDCV) and chick embryo cell cultures (PCEP).
There have been infrequently deaths reported following bat bites of
bat handlers in Europe where EBVL-infected bats reside. Nevertheless,
even one case that carries a risk deserves attention of public health.
Most bat bites are superficial and do not break through the skin to
reach the nerves. Bat researchers use protective plasters and gloves
to protect their fingers and hands, or perform disinfection of the
wound immediately after bat bites.
Conclusion
Rabies in bats is often considered not to be a serious risk to public
health when compared with other threats [29] that may cause higher
numbers of human infections per year or are more easily transmissible.
No one should handle diseased or dead bats without protection, such
as gloves or sticking plaster. Pre-exposure vaccination is also necessary
in this context. It is vital to obtain laboratory confirmation of rabies
in bat after human exposure through biting incidents. Rabies post-exposure
treatment is recommended after bat bites in patients, if previous pre-exposure
vaccination was (as usually) not performed.
Significant evidence of positive cases of rabies in European bats in
almost all the countries where laboratory confirmation of bat rabies
is implemented, and the fact that bats migrate long distances across
Europe [30] deserve attention. Health education and information on bat
rabies for health workers in various fields and for the public in Europe
should be promoted.
According to our experience with travellers, dogs represent a more
serious threat in many countries, yet the risk of bat bites also exist.
Education and recommendations should be given to travellers in order
to reduce their risk of infection [31]. Post-exposure rabies treatment
should be recommended to travellers reporting bat bites after returning
from countries where bat rabies is confirmed, or where epidemiological
data on bat rabies is missing. Experiences worldwide show that modern
rabies vaccines are extremely efficient for pre-exposure vaccination
and post-exposure treatment of rabies. Vaccines are highly immunogenic,
safe and protective [32].
Of 1727 bats examined in Europe in 2003, there were 33 cases of rabies:
0/1204 in England, 2/153 in France, 7/125 in Netherlands, 3/40 in Denmark,
13/73 in Germany, 0/6 in Check Republic, 0/1 in Austria, 0/24 in Switzerland,
0/3 in Hungary, 0/5 in Slovakia, 6/6 in Poland, 1/12 in Ukraine, 1/1
in Russian Federation and 0/74 in Albania [33]. Great caution is needed
in interpreting this data, because species should be properly identified,
the reason for data submission known, and the virus strains typed.
It is certainly not possible to deduce any prevalence figure from this
data.
Some countries do not report cases of rabies in bats to the WHO because
they do not carry out research in that field. The risk of rabies infection
after human contact with bats or bat bites in Europe is obviously present.
Pre-exposure rabies treatment is recommended for all those who are
occupationally exposed to bats anywhere in the world and in Europe.
Acknowledgement: I am grateful to veterinarians,
Peter Hostnik and Joe Grom from Veterinary Faculty University
of Ljubljana and to bat researcher Klemen Koselj from Cathedra for
Animal Physiology, Tübingen, Germany for suggestions during preparing
the manuscript.
This manuscript is partly based on a presentation by the author during
the European Workshop on Bat Rabies, Vilnius, Lithuania, 16. May 2004
http://www.eurobats.org/documents/Bat_Rabies_Workshop.htm
|