Introduction
Fox rabies arrived in northeast Germany in 1947 from the other side of
the Odra River in Poland, and the disease rapidly moved westwards into
West Germany. In 1951, the infection spread to foxes in southeastern
Bavaria bordering Austria and what was then Czechoslovakia. In subsequent
years there was dramatic progression of the disease in many parts of
Europe, and rabies spread all over Germany [1]. Consequently, from 1953,
the number of reported rabies cases steadily increased until 1968 [FIGURE
1]. As did other European countries, Germany attempted to solve the rabies
problem using conventional methods of fox rabies control aimed at the
disruption of the natural route of infection by reducing the fox density
below a certain threshold. These included attempts to hormonally sterilize
foxes, distribution of poison baits, trapping, digging and destroying
fox cubs in dens, den gassing and intensive culling. None of these methods
were successful in reducing and maintaining the fox population below
this endemic threshold [2]. In fact, rabies incidence drastically increased
nationwide in the late 1970s and early 1980s resulting in peaks of 10
634 and 10 484 reported rabies cases in wildlife and domestic animals
in 1977 and 1983, respectively [FIGURE 1].

Oral vaccination of foxes against rabies
Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) of foxes using modified live virus vaccines
offered a new method of rabies control in wildlife. In Germany,
the first field trial using chickenhead bait was conducted in the
federal
states of Hesse and Bavaria in 1983 [3]. Soon afterwards, ORV was
markedly enhanced by the development of a new machine-made bait
known as the Tübingen bait [4] that met the requirements for
a large-scale vaccination program, which was launched in West Germany
in 1985.
In East Germany, ORV started in 1989 [5]. With the enlargement
of vaccination areas reaching a maximum size of about 215 000 km2
in
1995, the policy of using ORV became increasingly successful and
rabies incidence decreased drastically in subsequent years [FIGURE
1]. However, achieving complete elimination of rabies using ORV
was more complicated than originally predicted.
In Germany, the federal states are responsible for all animal disease
control, including rabies control. Rabies incidence in certain areas
of Germany clearly reflected these differences in vaccination strategies
between the different federal states. Whereas in West Germany vaccination
areas were frequently adapted to the current rabies situation resulting
in a patchy pattern permanently changing with each vaccination campaign,
in East Germany large-scale vaccination was used. The federal states
in the east rapidly enlarged their vaccination areas and were able
to continuously vaccinate the entire territory for several consecutive
vaccination campaigns [6]. As a consequence, in the eastern parts
of Germany, a rapid decrease in the number of rabies cases was
observed
in the early 1990s after the implementation of ORV. These eastern
regions have been free of rabies for more than 10 years. In contrast,
some
areas in the west were declared ‘rabies-free’ too early:
the status frequently proved to be unsustainable, and severe set-backs
occurred [7]. Once large-scale vaccination was applied in the western
regions, rabies was quickly eliminated. During the past 10 years,
as in other European countries, the efficacy of oral fox vaccination
campaigns
has been increased by a permanent adaptation and optimisation of
the vaccination strategy based on analysis of the prevailing conditions
and recent scientific perceptions. These measures have included (i)
den baiting, (ii) double baiting (repeated aerial distribution of
baits
14 days after the first vaccination campaign in the same area using
perpendicular flight lines with a distance of 1000 metres), (iii)
summer vaccination, (iv) an increase of bait density and (v) a reduction
of
flight lines.
Recent and current rabies situation
As a result of ORV, the rabies incidence drastically decreased during
the past 20 years from 10 484 rabies cases in 1983 to 56 in 1999;
the lowest number of rabies cases ever reported in Germany. In 2000
a local increase in rabies incidence was observed with 182 rabies
cases were reported, exceeding the level reached in 1998 [FIGURE
1]. For example, the rabies situation in Saxony reflected a classical
cross-border problem at this time [FIGURE 2]. Here, an increasing
rabies incidence in the neighbouring regions of the Czech Republic
and Poland resulted in permanent re-infection along the common borders.
This situation forced the veterinary authorities to safeguard the
territory by maintaining a vaccination belt in those border areas
[8]. The breakthrough in rabies control in the Saxony region came
when continuous annual trilateral meetings with the countries involved
were initiated which led to a considerable improvement of the vaccination
strategies in the adjacent areas to Saxony. For more than three and
a half years no rabies case has been reported from this region.
However, in 2000, the main problem was two separated endemic rabies
foci comprising 3 western federal states [FIGURE 2]. Whereas the rabies
incidence in North Rhine Westphalia was unaltered, the increase in
rabies incidence was due mainly to a deterioration of the rabies situation
in the border area of Bavaria and Hesse. North Rhine Westphalia had
to face the problem of rabies in suburban and urban areas of the Ruhr,
one of the most densely populated areas in Europe, during the final
phase of rabies eradication. Due to improvement and adaptation of vaccination
strategies that took into consideration the peculiar topographical
features of a fragmented landscape and the high fox densities, the
number of rabies cases decreased in 2001. The last observed rabies
case due to sylvatic terrestrial rabies has been observed in Bavaria
and North Rhine Westphalia were reported in March and June 2001 respectively,
although rabies continued to be endemic in Hesse at a low level in
subsequent years [TABLE]. Here, rabies has been endemic in a very limited
area in the southernmost parts of the federal state, reflecting similar
topographical and geographical features of a fragmented landscape to
North Rhine Westphalia. Although large scale vaccination using aerial
distribution has been applied for several years, rabies cases in the
past five years have been frequently associated with suburban and urban
areas. While the rabies cases were initially limited to a 65 km2 region
affecting two adjacent communities close to the city of Offenbach,
due to inconsistent hand baiting the disease spread northwards into
the suburbs of Frankfurt/Main in 2002 and in the following year also
spread southwards into urban areas of adjacent districts. In 2004,
rabies cases were mainly concentrated in the southernmost part of Hesse,
the border triangle with Baden-Württemberg and Rhineland Palatinate
[FIGURE 2]. Though Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg have maintained
a preventive vaccination belt along the border with Hesse for over
three years, an adjacent area in Baden-Württemberg became re-infected
in December 2004. In order to reduce the infection pressure in the
core area, emergency vaccination was carried out in the respective
federal states in the same month. One month earlier, in November 2004,
the rabies situation in Hesse had forced veterinary authorities to
establish a 25 km deep preventive vaccination cordon in Rhineland Palatinate
along the Rhine River. Unfortunately, rabies crossed the river and
the first rabid foxes were found after 6 years of absence in January
2005, near the border with Hesse. In fact, the vaccination coverage
in the fox population after this first vaccination campaign continued
to be suboptimal, and up to April 2005 a total of 18 rabies cases were
confirmed in that area. Up to the end of September 2005, a total of
30 rabies cases have been reported from Rhineland Palatinate [FIGURE
3].



Conclusions and corrective actions
The local increase in the number of rabies cases and the resulting
spread of rabies in Germany in recent years are mainly due to (i)
increased fox densities (ii) the persistence of rabies in areas with
a extremely high density of settlements in which ORV is severely
hindered (a phenomenon that no other country in Europe has been confronted
with), (iii) inconsistent vaccination, e.g. missing complementary
distribution of baits per hand in non-flying zones and (iv) insufficient
prioritisation being given to rabies control in the final phase of
its elimination. Because animal disease control, e.g. rabies control
and ORV, is the responsibility of each federal state, insufficient
cooperation in the planning of vaccination campaigns between neighbouring
federal states has also been an important shortcoming.
As national and international concerns increased, several corrective
actions have been implemented in 2005, aimed at improving vaccination
protocols and a consistent vaccination strategy in the respective federal
states aiming to eliminate the residual focus this year.
In addition to strict application of EU recommendations [9], the measures
comprise:
- central planning and management of vaccination campaigns under the
auspices of the national reference laboratory for rabies,
- drastic enlargement of vaccination areas in particular in Rhineland
Palatinate, Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria to avoid further spreading
of the disease,
- increased frequency of vaccination campaigns in hot spots (6 week
intervals),
- strict complementary and intensified hand distribution in urban and
suburban areas,
- intensified rabies surveillance beyond the recommended sample size
of 8 foxes/100 km2/year, as well as consequent follow-up investigations.
Furthermore, to overcome possible cross-border problems and to improve
ORV programmes between neighbouring federal states, regular half–year
consultations including all stakeholders have been implemented, at
which the success of past vaccination campaigns is thoroughly evaluated,
problems discussed and common planning of subsequent vaccination campaigns
carried out. A completely new approach far beyond the EU recommendations
is the documentation of the precise location of bait drops during aerial
distribution using a satellite navigated and computer-supported fully
automatic system (SURVIS) for distributing oral rabies vaccine baits
[10]. This documentation allows real-time analysis of the quality of
aerial distribution by calculating the resulting bait density on the
ground after each vaccination campaign to identify areas with suboptimal
bait densities where complementary hand distribution needs to be applied
at a local level [11].
So far, the corrective actions taken in 2005 have resulted in halting
rabies spread in the respective areas. Recent epidemiological analysis
showed that rabies incidence has significantly decreased, and attainment
of rabies elimination can be expected in due course [unpublished data].
Nevertheless, the implemented vaccination strategy must be continued
for two more years after the last confirmed rabies case in order to
achieve the rabies-free status [9].
|