Introduction
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) was a notifiable disease under
the old veneral disease legislation (Bundesseuchengesetz) in Germany, which
was in use until the end of 2000. No case definition was used and the system
provided only aggregated case numbers, without information on patients’ risk
factors [1]. The number of reported LGV infections declined from a median
of 35 infections per year between 1990 and 1995) to seven infections per
year between 1996 and 2000. Under the new Infektionsschutzgesetz (Protection
Against Infection Act) introduced in 2001, the only sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) to remain notifiable were HIV and syphilis. At the end
of 2002, a nationwide sentinel surveillance system for STIs was introduced
by the Robert Koch-Institut to collect information on HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhoea,
trichomonas, anogenital warts and genital herpes. LGV was not included,
because it was considered a rare tropical disease. After the first alert
from the Netherlands in 2004 [2] and the report of the first LGV cases
in Germany [3, 4], we asked sentinel and all other physicians and laboratories
performing L1-L3 genotyping to voluntarily report LGV cases to the Robert
Koch-Institut in order to describe the outbreak and estimate its magnitude.
Methods
The German sentinel surveillance system for STIs collects data from 60
local health offices, 13 hospital-based STI clinics and 159 private
practitioners. Private practitioners such as specialists in dermatovenerology,
gynaecology, urology and HIV have been chosen at randomin all federal
states. Sentinel physicians are asked to report LGV cases to the Robert
Koch-Institut using sentinel reporting forms.
Updates on LGV were published in the German national epidemiological
bulletin [5, 6] which is read by local health authorities and private
practitioners. All physicians were asked to send their samples to laboratories
that perform chlamydia genotyping. Reports on cases were received from
sentinel physicians, other physicians, hospitals and laboratories. We
also provided information about LGV to magazines aimed at a gay readership.
A possible case was defined as a person with symptoms of proctitis and/or
inguinal lymph node swelling and a positive chlamydia serology. A probable
case also had a positive chlamydia rectal or urinary polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) test. A case was confirmed if the genotype L1-L3 was identified,
even if the patient’s symptoms were unknown.
Chlamydia trachomatis infections sent to the Arndt and
Partner diagnostic laboratory were diagnosed by DNA amplification
of lesional swabs or lymph node aspirates using PCR (Cobas TaqMan
CT, Roche, Mannheim) or strand displacement amplification (ProbeTec
ET, Becton-Dickinson, MD). C. trachomatis genotypes
were identified by sequence analysis of variable omp1 gene regions
(VS1, VS2, and VS4), amplified by PCR using primer pairs MF21/MB22
and MF44/MB4 [6].
Additional patient information was obtained by asking physicians. We
described confirmed, probable and possible LGV cases by demographic characteristics
and symptoms.
Results
Between May 2004 and November 2005, 61 confirmed and 17 probable or possible
cases were reported to the Robert Koch-Institut. All confirmed cases
were genotype L2. Reports were received from two local health offices,
seven hospital-based STI clinics and 17 private practitioners.
The epidemic curve is shown in figure 1. The median number of monthly
reported cases has increased from two in 2004 to four in 2005. All cases
were in men, and the mean age was 39 years. Main characteristics of LGV
patients are shown in the table. All 58 patients from whom an information
on sexual orientation was obtained were MSM. Twenty seven of all 78 cases
(35%) had proctitis and 31 had unspecified rectal symptoms. Ten patients
showed an inguinal lymph node swelling. Of those, one patient showed
confluent lymph nodes with signs of extensive inflammation. Whether this
patient was MSM is unknown.


Of the 52 patients with a known HIV status, 50 (96%) were known
to be HIV-positive. Two patients were HIV-negative while the
HIV status of 26 patients remains unknown. Patients originated
from eight different federal states. Forty five patients (58%)
were diagnosed in Hamburg, 17 (22%) in Berlin and 6 (8%) in
Munich. The geographical distribution is shown in figure 2.
Of 24 patients for whom information on sexual contacts in other
countries was available, three reported sexual contacts in the
Netherlands and in Belgium. The other 21 patients did not report
any contacts outside of Germany.
Discussion
In Germany, the first cases of LGV in MSM were observed
at approximately the same time as the first cases in the Netherlands,
France, Belgium and the United Kingdom [7-10]. It is possible
that the outbreak began among MSM in the Netherlands and subsequently
spread to Germany, but this remains unproven. Although information
on sexual contacts in other countries was only available for
a few German patients, the majority of these patients appear
to have become infected in Germany. LGV may therefore have become
endemic in the MSM community within two years of detection of
the first cases in Germany. Furthermore, the number of reported
patients with LGV has increased over the past few months and
there are no signs that the epidemic is over. Over 80% of the
reported cases have been diagnosed in large cities with a substantial
MSM community such as Berlin, Hamburg and Munich. LGV may be
more prevalent in these cities, but the difference could also
reflect a diagnostic bias. Since the main diagnostic laboratory
is situated in Hamburg, awareness among physicians may be higher
in Hamburg than elsewhere.
About two thirds of LGV patients knew they were HIV positive at the time
of their LGV diagnosis, a feature which has been observed in other countries
as well [7, 9]. Reported cases of HIV and syphilis among MSM have also
increased over the past three years in Germany [11, 12]. Since LGV facilitates
HIV transmission, the emergence of LGV in the MSM community in the context
of increasing numbers of newly acquired HIV infections should not be
ignored. Clinicians and MSM may not be sufficiently aware of the disease,
and existing efforts to promote awareness and prevention of sexually
transmitted infections and HIV need to be strengthened.
|