Increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae cause problems for treating gonorrhoea.

This observational study aimed to describe isolates from all patients found infected with N. gonorrhoeae, in Barcelona, Spain, between 2013 and 2017, and with available antimicrobial susceptibility data.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin (PEN), cefixime (CFM), ceftriaxone (CRO), azithromycin (AZM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), spectinomycin (SPT), fosfomycin (FOF) and gentamicin (GEN) were determined by E-test. Susceptibility was assessed using clinical breakpoints from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Time trends for PEN, CFM, AZM and CIP were investigated using logistic regression.

Of 1,979 patients with infection (2,036 isolates), 1,888 (95.4%) were men. Patient median age was 32 years. The proportions of isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins were low, with 0.3% (5/1,982) resistant to CRO and 4.9% (98/1,985) to CFM. AZM resistance prevalence was 2.7% (52/1,981), including 16 isolates detected in 2016 and 2017, with high-level resistance. For CIP, 51.3% (1,018/1,986) of isolates were resistant, and for PEN, 20.1% (399/1,985). All isolates were susceptible to SPT. MIC50 and MIC90 values of GEN were 4 and 6 mg/L and of FOF 12 and 24 mg/L, respectively. Between 2013 and 2017, PEN and CFM resistance rates each decreased from 28.1% (92/327) to 12.2% (70/572) and from 8.3% (27/327) to 4.4% (25/572) (p ≤ 0.0073). In contrast, AZM resistance prevalence appeared to increase from 1.5% in 2014 (5/340) to 3.0% (17/572) in 2017. No trend was identified for CIP.

Antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance is important to timely detect new phenotypes and trends.

The progression and geographical distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere is unknown because typically only symptomatic individuals are diagnosed. We performed a serological study of blood donors in Scotland in the spring of 2020 to detect neutralising antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 as a marker of past infection and epidemic progression.

Our objective was to determine if sera from blood bank donors can be used to track the emergence and progression of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic.

A pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 virus microneutralisation assay was used to detect neutralising antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. The study comprised samples from 3,500 blood donors collected in Scotland between 17 March and 18 May 2020. Controls were collected from 100 donors in Scotland during 2019.

All samples collected on 17 March 2020 (n = 500) were negative in the pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 virus microneutralisation assay. Neutralising antibodies were detected in six of 500 donors from 23 to 26 March. The number of samples containing neutralising antibodies did not significantly rise after 5–6 April until the end of the study on 18 May. We found that infections were concentrated in certain postcodes, indicating that outbreaks of infection were extremely localised. In contrast, other areas remained comparatively untouched by the epidemic.

Although blood donors are not representative of the overall population, we demonstrated that serosurveys of blood banks can serve as a useful tool for tracking the emergence and progression of an epidemic such as the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.