1887
Research Open Access
Like 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the global distribution of the intestinal protozoan its clinical picture remains unclear. This results from underdiagnosis: microscopic screening methods either lack sensitivity (wet preparation) or fail to reveal (formalin-fixed sample).

Aim

In a retrospective study setting, we characterised the clinical picture of dientamoebiasis and compared it with giardiasis. In addition, we evaluated an improved approach to formalin-fixed samples for suitability in diagnostics.

Methods

This study comprised four parts: (i) a descriptive part scrutinising rates of findings; (ii) a methodological part analysing an approach to detect -like structures in formalin samples; (iii) a clinical part comparing demographics and symptoms between patients with dientamoebiasis (n = 352) and giardiasis (n = 272), and (iv) a therapeutic part (n = 89 patients) investigating correlation between faecal eradication and clinical improvement.

Results

The rate of findings increased 20-fold after introducing criteria for -like structures in formalin-fixed samples (88.9% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity). A further increase was seen after implementing faecal PCR. Compared with patients with giardiasis, the symptoms in the group lasted longer and more often included abdominal pain, cramping, faecal urgency and loose rather than watery stools. Resolved symptoms correlated with successful faecal eradication (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Previously underdiagnosed, has become the most frequently recorded pathogenic enteroparasite in Finland. This presumably results from improved diagnostics with either PCR or detection of -like structures in formalin-fixed samples, an approach applicable also in resource-poor settings. Symptoms of dientamoebiasis differ slightly from those of giardiasis; patients with distressing symptoms require treatment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.29.1800546
2019-07-18
2019-08-23
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.29.1800546
Loading
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/24/29/eurosurv-24-29-6.html?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.29.1800546&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Clark CG, Röser D, Stensvold CR. Transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis: pinworm or cysts? Trends Parasitol. 2014;30(3):136-40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.01.005  PMID: 24492020 
  2. Stark D, Barratt J, Chan D, Ellis JT. Dientamoeba fragilis, the neglected trichomonad of the human bowel. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(3):553-80.  https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00076-15  PMID: 27170141 
  3. Munasinghe VS, Vella NG, Ellis JT, Windsor PA, Stark D. Cyst formation and faecal-oral transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis--the missing link in the life cycle of an emerging pathogen. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(11):879-83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.003  PMID: 23872523 
  4. Stark D, Garcia LS, Barratt JL, Phillips O, Roberts T, Marriott D, et al. Description of Dientamoeba fragilis cyst and precystic forms from human samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(7):2680-3.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00813-14  PMID: 24808242 
  5. van Gool T, Weijts R, Lommerse E, Mank TG. Triple Faeces Test: an effective tool for detection of intestinal parasites in routine clinical practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;22(5):284-90. PMID: 12736794 
  6. Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fresh stool specimens using PCR. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(1):57-62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.09.003  PMID: 15619516 
  7. Verweij JJ, Mulder B, Poell B, van Middelkoop D, Brienen EA, van Lieshout L. Real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fecal samples. Mol Cell Probes. 2007;21(5-6):400-4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2007.05.006  PMID: 17587544 
  8. Stensvold CR, Nielsen HV. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular screening platforms. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(2):540-1.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.06012-11  PMID: 22090410 
  9. Ken Dror S, Pavlotzky E, Barak M. Evaluation of the NanoCHIP Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) test for simultaneous detection of parasitic and bacterial enteric pathogens in fecal specimens. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159440.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159440  PMID: 27447173 
  10. Chan D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Phillips O, Šlapeta J, Ryan U, et al. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in animal faeces using species specific real time PCR assay. Vet Parasitol. 2016;227:42-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.025  PMID: 27523936 
  11. Stark D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J. A review of the clinical presentation of dientamoebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82(4):614-9.  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0478  PMID: 20348509 
  12. Holtman GA, Kranenberg JJ, Blanker MH, Ott A, Lisman-van Leeuwen Y, Berger MY. Dientamoeba fragilis colonization is not associated with gastrointestinal symptoms in children at primary care level. Fam Pract. 2017;34(1):25-9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw111  PMID: 27784723 
  13. Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. A review of Dientamoeba fragilis carriage in humans: several reasons why this organism should be considered in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illness. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(1):3-12.  https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.2.1.14755  PMID: 21637013 
  14. Banik GR, Barratt JL, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis JT, Stark D. A case-controlled study of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in children. Parasitology. 2011;138(7):819-23.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182011000448  PMID: 21524324 
  15. Stark D, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis J, Harkness J. Prospective study of the prevalence, genotyping, and clinical relevance of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in an Australian population. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2718-23.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.6.2718-2723.2005  PMID: 15956388 
  16. Vandenberg O, Peek R, Souayah H, Dediste A, Buset M, Scheen R, et al. Clinical and microbiological features of dientamoebiasis in patients suspected of suffering from a parasitic gastrointestinal illness: a comparison of Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia lamblia infections. Int J Infect Dis. 2006;10(3):255-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.011  PMID: 16469517 
  17. Kurt O, Girginkardeşler N, Balcioğlu IC, Ozbilgin A, Ok UZ. A comparison of metronidazole and single-dose ornidazole for the treatment of dientamoebiasis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(6):601-4.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02002.x  PMID: 18397330 
  18. Vandenberg O, Souayah H, Mouchet F, Dediste A, van Gool T. Treatment of Dientamoeba fragilis infection with paromomycin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(1):88-90.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000247139.89191.91  PMID: 17195717 
  19. Girginkardeşler N, Coşkun S, Cüneyt Balcioğlu I, Ertan P, Ok UZ. Dientamoeba fragilis, a neglected cause of diarrhea, successfully treated with secnidazole. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(2):110-3.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00504.x  PMID: 12588330 
  20. Röser D, Simonsen J, Stensvold CR, Olsen KE, Bytzer P, Nielsen HV, et al. Metronidazole therapy for treating dientamoebiasis in children is not associated with better clinical outcomes: a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(12):1692-9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu188  PMID: 24647023 
  21. de Jong MJ, Korterink JJ, Benninga MA, Hilbink M, Widdershoven J, Deckers-Kocken JM. Dientamoeba fragilis and chronic abdominal pain in children: a case-control study. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(12):1109-13.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-305942  PMID: 25053737 
  22. Ögren J, Dienus O, Löfgren S, Einemo IM, Iveroth P, Matussek A. Dientamoeba fragilis prevalence coincides with gastrointestinal symptoms in children less than 11 years old in Sweden. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(10):1995-8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2442-6  PMID: 26173693 
  23. Cacciò SM. Molecular epidemiology of Dientamoeba fragilis. Acta Trop. 2018;184:73-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.029  PMID: 28697994 
  24. Pelkonen T, Dos Santos MD, Roine I, Dos Anjos E, Freitas C, Peltola H, et al. Potential diarrheal pathogens common also in healthy children in Angola. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(5):424-8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001781  PMID: 28885460 
  25. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY. Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in human fecal specimens preserved in EcoFix: comparison of Wheatley’s trichrome stain and EcoStain. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(7):1974-6. PMID: 9650947 
  26. Garcia LS, Bruckner DA. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology; 2007.
  27. DuPont HL. Persistent diarrhea: a clinical review. JAMA. 2016;315(24):2712-23.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7833  PMID: 27357241 
  28. DuPont HL. Clinical practice. Bacterial diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1560-9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0904162  PMID: 19828533 
  29. Escobedo AA, Hanevik K, Almirall P, Cimerman S, Alfonso M. Management of chronic Giardia infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014;12(9):1143-57.  https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.942283  PMID: 25059638 
  30. Röser D, Simonsen J, Nielsen HV, Stensvold CR, Mølbak K. Dientamoeba fragilis in Denmark: epidemiological experience derived from four years of routine real-time PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(10):1303-10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1880-2  PMID: 23609513 
  31. Ögren J, Dienus O, Löfgren S, Iveroth P, Matussek A. Dientamoeba fragilis DNA detection in Enterobius vermicularis eggs. Pathog Dis. 2013;69(2):157-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12071  PMID: 23893951 
  32. Röser D, Nejsum P, Carlsgart AJ, Nielsen HV, Stensvold CR. DNA of Dientamoeba fragilis detected within surface-sterilized eggs of Enterobius vermicularis. Exp Parasitol. 2013;133(1):57-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2012.10.009  PMID: 23116599 
  33. Jokelainen P, Hebbelstrup Jensen B, Andreassen BU, Petersen AM, Röser D, Krogfelt KA, et al. Dientamoeba fragilis, a commensal in children in Danish day care centers. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(6):1707-13.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00037-17  PMID: 28330885 
  34. Heusinkveld M, Mughini-Gras L, Pijnacker R, Vennema H, Scholts R, van Huisstede-Vlaanderen KW, et al. Potential causative agents of acute gastroenteritis in households with preschool children: prevalence, risk factors, clinical relevance and household transmission. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(10):1691-700.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2714-9  PMID: 27372926 
  35. Menéndez Fernández-Miranda C, Fernández-Suarez J, Rodríguez-Pérez M, Menéndez Fernández-Miranda P, Vázquez F, Boga Ribeiro JA, et al. Prevalence of D. fragilis infection in the household contacts of a group of infected patients. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2018;36(7):423-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2017.08.004  PMID: 29078992 
  36. van Gestel RS, Kusters JG, Monkelbaan JF. A clinical guideline on Dientamoeba fragilis infections. Parasitology. 2018;1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018001385  PMID: 30165915 
  37. Gough R, Ellis J, Stark D. Comparison and Recommendations for the use of Dientamoeba fragilis Real-Time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(5):e01466-18.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01466-18  PMID: 30814263 
  38. Lääveri T, Antikainen J, Pakkanen SH, Kirveskari J, Kantele A. Prospective study of pathogens in asymptomatic travellers and those with diarrhoea: aetiological agents revisited. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(6):535-41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.02.011  PMID: 26970046 
  39. Brands MR, Van de Vijver E, Haisma SM, Heida A, van Rheenen PF. No association between abdominal pain and Dientamoeba in Dutch and Belgian children. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(7):686-9.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316383  PMID: 30798256 
  40. Laine J, Huovinen E, Virtanen MJ, Snellman M, Lumio J, Ruutu P, et al. An extensive gastroenteritis outbreak after drinking-water contamination by sewage effluent, Finland. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(7):1105-13.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268810002141  PMID: 20843387 
/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.29.1800546
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary data

Comment has been disabled for this content
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error