Authors’ response: Is a reduced duration of post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance really in our best interests?

Letters Open Access

Like 0

Authors’ response: Is a reduced duration of post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance really in our best interests?
M B Koek¹ , Collective on behalf of the authors of the original article²
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations

Affiliations: ¹ Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands ² http://eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=21042

Correspondence:
M Koek
mayke.koek rivm.nl
View Citation Hide Citation

Citation style for this article: Koek M B, on behalf of the authors of the original article Collective. Authors’ response: Is a reduced duration of post-discharge surgical site infection surveillance really in our best interests?. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(13):pii=21082. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.13.21082 Received: 24 Mar 2015

There is no abstract available.

Article metrics loading...

/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.13.21082

2015-04-02

2024-09-19

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.13.21082

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eurosurveillance/20/13/art21082-en.htm?itemId=/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.13.21082&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Submit comment

Comment moderation successfully completed